The Solidarity union has thrown its full weight behind the campaign to raise Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) in the UK. At just £109.40 per week, SSP currently amounts to less than £3 per hour for a full-time worker. This figure falls shockingly short of the minimum wage, leaving sick workers struggling to cover basic living costs. The inadequacy of SSP has been a long-standing issue, but the cost-of-living crisis has brought its dire consequences into sharper focus.
A Global Perspective
When compared to other developed nations, the UK’s SSP is embarrassingly low. In Germany, sick workers can receive up to 70% of their salary for a duration of up to 78 weeks. France offers 50% of the worker’s salary for up to six months, with additional employer contributions often making up the difference. Meanwhile, the UK’s flat-rate SSP not only fails to account for actual earnings but is also among the lowest in the OECD. It’s a policy that punishes the sick and entrenches inequality.
Labour’s Silence is Deafening
While unions like Solidarity are leading the call for reform, the Labour Party has been disappointingly quiet. This is particularly troubling given Labour’s historic commitment to workers’ rights. The party’s leadership has yet to outline a clear policy on SSP, leaving many to wonder whether it is truly prepared to champion the needs of working people. Solidarity is urging Labour to step up and back a meaningful increase in SSP that reflects the cost of living and restores dignity to workers.
Unions United
Solidarity is not alone in this fight. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has repeatedly called for SSP to be raised to match the real living wage. Unite the Union and GMB have also highlighted the human cost of low SSP, citing examples of workers who have been forced to choose between health and financial survival. This coalition of voices underscores the growing recognition that the UK’s sick pay system is broken and in urgent need of reform.
A Call for Action
Pat Harrington, General Secretary of the Solidarity union, has been unequivocal in his demand for change: “The current rate of SSP is not just inadequate; it’s an insult to working people. No one should have to face financial ruin because they’re too unwell to work. Solidarity is committed to campaigning for an increase that brings SSP in line with the real living wage. We call on the government and the Labour Party to address this injustice without delay.”
What’s Next?
The campaign to raise SSP is gaining momentum, but it will take sustained pressure to achieve meaningful change. Solidarity is calling on all workers to join the fight, whether by supporting union campaigns, contacting their MPs, or sharing their stories of how low SSP has affected them. Together, we can push for a system that values health and protects the vulnerable.
It’s time for the UK to catch up with the rest of the developed world and ensure that no worker is left behind when they need support the most.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the union and labour movement in the UK. Reports are by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: Fire Service Cuts Spark Safety Alarm: FBU Calls for Urgent Action. Facing the Future: Prime Minister Starmer’s Tough Choices for Britain. Labour’s Pledge Paralysis: The Gig-Economy Conundrum. Energy Bill Surge: A Call for Fairness Amidst Rising Profits. And finally, Steel Sector Struggles: Job Losses Loom as Industry Faces Transformation.
Fire Service Cuts Spark Safety Alarm: FBU Calls for Urgent Action
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has sounded an alarm over the compromised safety of the British public. They attribute the peril to significant cuts in the fire and rescue services. A worrying 21% reduction in front-line firefighter roles has been reported over the last decade. This translates to a loss of around 12,000 jobs. The situation is worsened by the fact that 4,000 firefighters are counted twice in the workforce figures. This happens due to them holding dual contracts. This paints a misleading picture of the actual manpower available for emergency response.
The FBU has highlighted a troubling increase in response times to life-threatening fires. The response times now stand at an average of over nine minutes, up from 6.11 minutes in 1995. This delay is partly due to the reduction of one-third of fire control staff. These staff members are crucial for receiving emergency calls and deploying crews. The cuts have been felt deeply across various regions. Buckinghamshire, West Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire, Greater Manchester, and London face the most severe workforce reductions. London alone is losing 1,349 firefighters, marking a 22% decrease.
Facing the Future: Prime Minister Starmer’s Tough Choices for Britain
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a pivotal speech, has outlined a stark vision for Britain. He has acknowledged the severe economic challenges ahead. He emphasized the necessity for “unpopular decisions” to mend the societal and economic fissures. Starmer’s rhetoric prepares the nation for a time of hardship. It underscores the gravity of the situation inherited from the previous administration. His message to the working people of Britain is clear. Brace for impact. The road to recovery will be arduous.
Criticism has been swift, with accusations of Starmer insulting the British workforce by suggesting further economic strain. Opposition voices within the Labour movement, like Momentum, argue that the narrative of necessary austerity undermines the electorate’s trust. It also undermines the party’s foundational principles. They assert that the government possesses ample means to foster societal transformation without compromising living standards.
Amidst the controversy, the Labour government faces the colossal task of revitalizing industry. They must rejuvenate public services. They also need to restore eroded living standards. TUC’s Paul Nowak echoes the sentiment. He believes that while there are no quick fixes, the commitment to a long-term strategy is paramount. The nation watches as Starmer navigates these turbulent times, balancing honesty with hope, and austerity with ambition.
Labour’s Pledge Paralysis: The Gig-Economy Conundrum
The Labour Party’s New Deal For Working People is facing criticism for its lack of clarity on gig-economy worker rights. The Autonomy Institute has pointed out the party’s retreat from a key commitment: establishing a single “worker” status. This move would have ensured gig-economy workers were entitled to employee benefits, including National Insurance and paid leave. It would have aligned them with broader reforms like fair wages and sick pay.
Labour previously condemned the exploitation of gig-economy workers as a significant economic blight. These workers are some of the most vulnerable and underpaid in the UK. The think tank insists that Labour must maintain its initial proposal to merge various employment categories into one. This is necessary to enact substantial and lasting reform. Without this, any advancements risk being undone by subsequent administrations.
The party’s determination to abolish zero-hour contracts is also in question, as earlier firm pledges appear softened. This wavering stance casts doubt on Labour’s commitment to securing better conditions for gig-economy workers, leaving the future of these reforms and the workers’ security in a precarious balance.
Amidst the rising challenges of climate change, which include frequent flooding, wildfires, and storms, the FBU’s General Secretary Matt Wrack has underscored the critical impact of fourteen years of austerity on the fire and rescue services. The union is urgently calling on the Labour party to prioritize investment in the fire and rescue services to safeguard public safety and ensure that the emergency services can respond effectively to the increasing demands of a changing climate.
Energy Bill Surge: A Call for Fairness Amidst Rising Profits
As autumn approaches, UK households brace for a 10% increase in energy bills, as confirmed by the industry regulator. The price cap is set to rise from £1,568 to £1,717 starting October 1, pushing an additional 400,000 homes into fuel poverty—a total of six million, according to National Energy Action. Ofgem’s chief, Jonathan Brearley, defends the hike, stating it allows energy firms to cover costs and make modest profits. However, this comes against the backdrop of energy giants amassing £470 billion in profits since 2020, with British Gas’s profits soaring to £750m last year.
The profit surge has sparked outrage among the public and calls for energy to be taken from private hands. Unite’s Sharon Graham criticizes the stark contrast between the struggling masses and the flourishing energy sector. The government faces pressure to reverse its decision to cut winter fuel payments, previously available to all pensioners, now limited to those on pension credits or means-tested benefits. This move, deemed “reckless” by Age UK’s Caroline Abrahams, risks leaving many vulnerable without support.
The situation highlights a growing divide and prompts a debate on energy ownership and support for those in need. With profits soaring and winter approaching, the question remains: will the government and energy firms find a balance between business and social responsibility?
and finally, Steel Sector Struggles: Job Losses Loom as Industry Faces Transformation
The UK steel industry is at a critical juncture as Labour’s promises to safeguard steel jobs are proving untenable. The stark reality is that union leaders’ decision to avoid strikes earlier in the year, placing faith in Labour leader Keir Starmer, may have been misguided. Now, with the threat of significant job losses at British Steel’s Scunthorpe site, the call for industrial action is resurfacing. Jingye Group, the owner, is contemplating the cessation of blast furnace operations, potentially affecting 2,500 workers. This move comes amidst discussions with the government to reduce coal imports, signalling a shift in the industry’s future.
The potential closure of blast furnaces not only threatens jobs but also indicates a shift towards importing steel, primarily from China, which could replace the three million tonnes produced domestically. Jingye is seeking a substantial £600 million government grant to modernize its facilities, including the transition to electric arc furnace technology, aligning with decarbonization goals. However, this transition is overshadowed by the immediate risk to jobs, especially as the Port Talbot steelworks also faces cuts under Tata’s ownership.
Labour’s response to the crisis has been cautious, with Starmer acknowledging the difficulty of the situation without offering false hope. Similarly, Labour’s Welsh secretary Jo Stevens has expressed a desire to protect jobs but recognizes that redundancies are likely. This acknowledgment does little to quell the uncertainty faced by steelworkers and their communities as the industry stands on the precipice of change, with the government’s role in this transformation becoming increasingly scrutinized.
In the King’s Speech Labour has laid out a legislative agenda that promises to reshape the landscape of workers’ rights and public ownership in Britain. The speech, while brief in its mention of specific policies, has set the stage for significant reforms aimed at banning exploitative practices and enhancing employment rights. This ambitious agenda has sparked enthusiasm among pro-worker and pro-union advocates, who see it as a long-overdue move towards a fairer and more equitable society.
Transformative Proposals in the Employment Rights Bill
The cornerstone of Labour’s new agenda is the Employment Rights Bill, which promises sweeping changes to improve the lives of workers across the country. The bill includes several key provisions:
Parental Leave, Sick Pay, and Protection from Unfair Dismissal: Making these benefits available from day one is a crucial step in ensuring that all workers, regardless of their employment duration, have access to basic rights. This move is particularly significant for those in precarious jobs, offering them much-needed security.
Banning Zero-Hour Contracts: Zero-hour contracts have long been criticized for their exploitative nature, providing workers with little job security and unpredictable income. By banning these contracts, Labour is addressing a major issue that has left many workers in a state of constant uncertainty.
Ending ‘Fire and Rehire’ Practices: The practice of firing employees only to rehire them on less favourable terms has been a contentious issue. Reforming the law to end this exploitative practice will protect workers from being manipulated and ensure fair treatment.
Removing the Lower Earnings Limit for Statutory Sick Pay: This change ensures that all workers, regardless of their income level, have access to sick pay. It is a vital reform, especially for low-income workers who are often most vulnerable to financial hardship when ill.
Making Flexible Working the Default: By making flexible working the default from day one, Labour is recognizing the importance of work-life balance and the diverse needs of the modern workforce. This policy is expected to particularly benefit working parents and those with caring responsibilities.
Protection for Women Post-Maternity Leave: Making it unlawful to dismiss a woman within six months of returning from maternity leave is a progressive step towards gender equality in the workplace. It ensures that women are not penalized for starting families.
Creation of the Fair Work Agency: This new agency will play a crucial role in enforcing workplace rights, ensuring that the new laws are implemented effectively and that workers can seek redress when their rights are violated.
Fair Pay Agreement in Adult Social Care: The introduction of a Fair Pay Agreement in the adult social care sector addresses the chronic underpayment and undervaluation of care workers, a predominantly female and minority workforce.
Simplifying Union Recognition: Making it easier for trade unions to gain statutory recognition empowers workers to collectively bargain for better terms and conditions, a fundamental right in any democratic society.
Repealing Minimum Service Levels for Industrial Action: This repeal restores the right to strike, which is essential for workers to negotiate fair wages and conditions without the fear of legal repercussions.
Paul Nowak, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), hailed the Employment Rights Bill as a vital step towards “repairing and rebuilding Britain after 14 years of chaos and decline.” He emphasized that boosting workers’ rights and ensuring security and respect at work are pivotal for a fair economy. This sentiment is echoed by Christina McAnea, General Secretary of Unison, who described the workplace rights package as a “game changer,” particularly praising the focus on social care.
Public Ownership and Infrastructure Reforms
In addition to the Employment Rights Bill, Labour’s agenda includes significant measures aimed at reversing the privatization of essential services. Key among these is the renationalization of railways and the establishment of Great British Energy, a publicly owned clean energy production company.
Mick Whelan, General Secretary of Aslef, the train drivers’ union, praised the decision to renationalize the railways as “the right decision, at the right time,” emphasizing its potential to stimulate economic growth and rebuild Britain’s infrastructure. Similarly, the creation of Great British Energy is seen as a pivotal move towards a sustainable future, capable of driving the green transition while creating jobs and boosting the economy.
The Better Buses Bill, which grants communities the power to take back control of bus services, also received strong support. Public ownership of bus services, as demonstrated by successful municipally owned companies like Reading Buses, can significantly improve local transport and contribute to economic vitality.
Missed Opportunities and Future Campaigns
Despite the many positive proposals, there are areas where Labour’s agenda falls short. The absence of plans to bring water companies into public ownership, reinstate the NHS as a fully public service, and buy back British Gas are notable omissions that have disappointed some advocates. These missed opportunities highlight the need for continued campaigning to push Labour towards a more comprehensive public ownership model.
Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, warned against the constraints of a “financial straitjacket,” arguing that substantial investment is necessary to tackle the current crises in public services and infrastructure. She stressed that reliance on growth alone might not be sufficient to deliver the urgent changes needed.
Our GenSec’s View
Patrick Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union commented: “Labour’s legislative agenda, as outlined in the King’s Speech, marks a significant shift towards enhancing workers’ rights and reversing decades of privatization. While the proposals have been broadly welcomed by unions and pro-worker advocates, the journey towards a truly fair and equitable society requires ongoing vigilance and activism. As the details of the draft legislation emerge, I t will be crucial for unions and workers to continue to advocate for comprehensive reforms that ensure dignity, fairness, and security for all workers.”
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s episode: Byron Court Primary School Faces Privatisation Battle Amid Harris Federation Controversy, Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers, Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes, Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal, Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer, and finally Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election.
Byron Court Primary School in North London is at the centre of a heated battle over privatisation plans. The community school, located in Brent, north London, is set to join the notorious Harris Federation academy chain, a move that has sparked outrage among teachers, parents, and local residents.
The controversy began after Ofsted inspectors downgraded Byron Court from an “outstanding” rating to “inadequate” last November. The inspection report highlighted issues of bullying, racist language, and sexual harassment within the school. Parents lost confidence in the institution, and head teacher Martyn Boxall resigned in response to the damning findings.
Acting head Richard Sternberg, who was leading the school during the inspection, assured parents that efforts were underway to address the school’s challenges. However, the Department for Education (DfE) issued an academy order, mandating that Byron Court become part of the Harris Federation—a multi-academy trust known for its involvement in improving educational standards across London and Essex.
The Harris Federation operates 54 primary and secondary schools, directly funded by the DfE and independent of local authority control. Despite the controversy, the federation aims to transform Byron Court through its expertise and resources.
Teachers at Byron Court have taken a stand against the privatisation move. Members of the National Education Union (NEU) went on strike, with further strikes planned for June 4 to 6. NEU national executive member Jenny Cooper emphasized that the union would not accept the politicized privatisation of schools.
A veteran teacher in Brent expressed concerns about the Ofsted inspection process. According to her, the inspectors were rude, altered the inspection timetable, and denied staff necessary support. The inspection outcome, she argued, unfairly smeared the school staff and served as a tool for academisation.
The attempted academisation, however, has faced resistance. The strikes by Byron Court staff have disrupted the Harris Federation’s plans. The teacher hopes that the collective effort will deter the federation from proceeding.
A joint statement from Brent NEU and the Save Byron Court Parent Campaign revealed that nearly two-thirds of parents want the school to remain a community institution. Staff members share this sentiment, yet they find themselves excluded from discussions about the school’s future. The question remains: How can decisions affecting the staff, families, and local community be made without their input
Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers
Retail sales in the UK took a nosedive last month, leaving shop owners and economists concerned. The culprit? A combination of relentless rain and mounting cost-of-living pressures.
Across all sectors, sales plummeted by 2.3 per cent. But certain categories felt the brunt of the storm: clothing, sports equipment, furniture, and games and toys. These segments were particularly affected by the inclement weather during April.
Clothing and household stores bore the brunt of the decline, experiencing a sharp 4.1 per cent drop—the most significant fall since January 2021. Meanwhile, fashion and footwear retailers alone saw sales dip by 5.1 per cent month on month.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak emphasized the importance of local spending to stimulate growth and support businesses. He stated, “A sustainable recovery hinges on people’s ability to spend in their local economies.”
However, the retail slump underscores ongoing challenges for families grappling with the cost-of-living crisis. Millions are tightening their belts, and household budgets remain under immense strain.
Despite claims of success from the Conservative government, real wages still lag behind pre-2008 levels. The British public remains skeptical, well aware that bills continue to rise.
An Office for National Statistics survey revealed that 55 per cent of adults reported increased living costs over the past month. Food prices topped the list (cited by 94 per cent), followed by fuel (61 per cent), and energy bills (53 per cent).
Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes
Council workers in Scotland are gearing up for a potential summer strike after unanimously rejecting what they deem a “derisory” pay offer. Unite, the union representing these workers, dismissed the proposal put forth by local government body Cosla.
The contentious 18-month deal would have provided council staff with a 2.2% increase from April this year, followed by an additional 2% hike in October. However, Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, emphasized that their members deserve better and should not settle for less.
Graham McNab, Unite’s industrial officer, echoed this sentiment, stating that the pay offer falls far short of meeting the aspirations of local government workers. Unite also opposes the shift of the pay anniversary date to October, viewing it as a mere delay tactic.
Cosla, on the other hand, maintains that their offer is “strong, fair, and credible.” They argue that severe financial constraints faced by councils necessitate a cautious approach to affordability in the context of a flat-cash local government settlement.
As tensions rise, Unison—the largest local government union in Scotland—has also recommended that staff vote against the pay deal. Meanwhile, GMB Scotland’s local government committee rejected the offer, and their members have already backed strike action in a consultative ballot. A formal ballot for care workers is currently underway
Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal
The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) is turning up the heat on Labour, demanding the scrapping of the Tories’ controversial minimum service levels legislation. FBU President Ian Murray made this commitment during his opening address at the union’s annual conference in Blackpool.
Murray, a veteran of such gatherings for over two decades, expressed frustration with the state of fire and rescue services. He cited resolutions and policy statements that consistently highlighted the sector’s decline, fragmentation, and inadequate infrastructure investment.
“We’re fighting year after year for the meagre remains on the Treasury table,” Murray declared. “It’s not even enough to maintain the status quo. We need change, and hopefully, a general election will deliver it.”
The FBU’s focus centres on Labour’s promise to repeal the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act within 100 days if the party secures victory in the upcoming general election. This legislation currently mandates fire and rescue services to operate at 73% capacity during strikes, while control rooms continue normal operations despite industrial action.
Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer
The National Education Union (NEU), NASUWT, NAHT, and ASCL school leaders’ union have joined forces to call for urgent action from Education Secretary Gillian Keegan. In a joint letter, they demand the immediate release of the School Teachers’ Review Body’s (STRB) recommendations and the government’s response.
Their key demand? A “fully-funded, above-inflation pay increase for all teachers and school leaders in September 2024.” Anything less, they argue, would be a dereliction of the government’s duty to safeguard the education service. The unions warn that any continued failure to invest adequately will exact a heavy political toll at the upcoming general election.
The STRB, an independent advisory body, provides recommendations on teachers’ and school leaders’ pay and conditions in England. Last week, the latest STRB Report landed on Keegan’s desk. The unions insist that its findings must be made public without delay.
In a pointed reference to Keegan’s previous commitment to align the STRB process with the school budget cycle, the unions emphasize the urgency of publishing the report. They highlight the critical recruitment and retention challenges faced by the education sector. Delaying the report’s release could exacerbate these problems, leading to more teachers and school leaders considering leaving the profession.
Research from the NFER and the House of Commons Education Committee underscores the severity of the recruitment and retention crisis. Teaching’s competitive position has suffered due to pay cuts worse than those in other professions. Skyrocketing workloads compound the challenges. Evidence supports the case for higher teacher pay increases relative to the wider economy to address teacher supply issues.
Moreover, schools have grappled with resource constraints since 2010, with 70% experiencing real-terms funding reductions due to government cuts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that an additional £3.2 billion is needed to restore school spending power to pre-2010 levels.
The unions urge the government to prioritize education investment. Their first demand: a fully funded, above-inflation pay rise for educators in September 2024. Failure to meet this crucial step would jeopardize the education service’s future.
Parents, teachers, and school leaders await Keegan’s response. The stakes are high—the government’s actions will resonate at the General Election.
and finally, Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election
As the 2024 general election approaches, voters across the United Kingdom are faced with critical decisions. Amidst the familiar political landscape dominated by the old gang parties, a new force is emerging: the Workers Party of Britain. Led by the charismatic George Galloway, this party aims to challenge the status quo and provide a fresh alternative for disillusioned voters.
Why Consider the Workers Party?
The Workers Party’s rallying cry is stalwart support for the Palestinian people and opposition to British complicity in the Gaza genocide1. While this issue remains central, the party also addresses a wide range of concerns, from healthcare (NHS) to the economy, crime, and immigration. The economic policies of the Party are pro-union and pro-worker.
The Workers Party plans to contest almost every English seat in the upcoming election, making it the largest left-of-Labour electoral challenge in history. Their goal is to have the same impact on Labour as Nigel Farage’s Reform Party had on the Tories. With over 500 candidates already in place, they’re poised to shake up the political landscape.
Independent Left Candidates: The Workers Party supports a select group of independent left-leaning candidates. Among them are Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, who will stand as an independent in Islington North, and Andrew Feinstein, chosen by the Organise Corbyn-Inspired Socialist Alliance (OCISA) to unseat Keir Starmer in Holborn and St Pancras. These candidates offer an alternative to the mainstream parties.
As the election draws near, voters must seriously consider their options. The Workers Party, with its principled stance, and independent candidates, offer a compelling alternative. Whether you’re disillusioned with the major parties or seeking a new vision for Britain, the Workers Party and Independent left candidates deserve your attention. Remember, the ballot box is one way to achieve change, and this election presents an opportunity to shape the future of our nation.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg. This week: ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action, Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute, Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul, and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy.
ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action
Rail passengers across the United Kingdom are facing significant disruptions due to strike action as a consequence of the failure of rail companies and government to resolve a two-year-long dispute over pay and working conditions. Train drivers affiliated with the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) are striking. The strikes have already begun and will continue on Wednesday and Thursday. Drivers are also banning overtime until Saturday, exacerbating the situation.
Southeastern, Southern, Thameslink, and Gatwick Express routes are the services affected.
The dispute centers around pay. ASLEF members have not received a pay rise in five years, leading to frustration and industrial action. formal talks between the operators and the union have not occurred for a year, making this the longest-ever rail industry dispute.
As action continues, commuters are left grappling with disrupted travel plans, and the pressure mounts on the government and rail companies involved to seek a resolution with ASLEF. Stay tuned for further updates as the situation unfolds.
Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute
In a bold move, more than 1,000 security guards employed by G4S at Jobcentres across the country are set to walk out in a 24-hour strike starting tonight. The dispute centres around pay, with guards demanding fair compensation for their crucial role.
The GMB union, representing these guards, revealed that a recent survey found alarming rates of abuse suffered by its members. Shockingly, four out of five guards reported incidents of physical violence, including dog attacks and assaults by members of the public.
But it’s not just physical harm they face. Guards also endure daily verbal abuse, ranging from threats against their families to racist slurs and even death threats.
The strike action is scheduled for multiple dates, including May 13, 20, 28, and 29. GMB national officer Eamon O’Hearn emphasized the immense pressure these guards operate under, stating, “G4S and the Department for Work and Pensions are content to let guards scrape by on minimum wage. These survey results underscore the urgent need for change.”
This marks the first time that guards have united to demand better conditions. A spokesperson for G4S expressed disappointment at the decision and stated that the company is still attempting to reach an amicable agreement.
Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul
In a move that has sparked heated debate, the UK government has unveiled proposals to overhaul the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. While the government aims to address rising costs and streamline support, unions and disabled rights campaigners have raised serious objections.
Here’s what critics are saying about the proposed changes:
Charities and advocacy groups have labelled the government’s plans as “dangerous” and “reckless.” They argue that restricting access to PIP and replacing regular cash payments with other forms of provision could have devastating consequences for disabled individuals. Concerns centre around the potential impact on vulnerable claimants who rely on consistent financial support. One-off grants may not adequately meet ongoing needs, leading to increased hardship.
The government’s emphasis on mental health conditions in the proposed reforms has drawn criticism. While it acknowledges the rise in PIP claims related to mental health, campaigners worry that the changes may inadvertently harm those with invisible disabilities3. Critics argue that lump-sum grants may not address the ongoing challenges faced by individuals with fluctuating conditions. Regular cash payments provide stability, whereas one-off grants may fall short.
Disabled rights campaigners emphasize the need for a fair and compassionate welfare system. While the government aims to target support more accurately, critics fear that vulnerable claimants could slip through the cracks.
Removing the PIP assessment altogether for certain health conditions or disabilities may simplify bureaucracy, but it must not compromise essential assistance for those most in need.
As consultations begin, the government faces mounting pressure to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and safeguarding the well-being of disabled individuals. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of disability benefits in the UK.
and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy
In a dramatic turn of events, several unions have issued stern warnings to the Labour Party, urging them not to dilute their proposed New Deal for Working People. Recent reports in the Financial Times suggest that the party may be reconsidering some of its earlier commitments, leading to concerns among labour advocates.
Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, minced no words: “Choosing May Day to signal a retreat from overhauling one of Europe’s worst employment rights frameworks is beyond ironic. If Labour fails to explicitly reaffirm their promise that the New Deal for Workers will be fully implemented within the first 100 days of office, they will cross a red line.”
The GMB union echoes the sentiment: “Working people are desperate for change, and we expect Labour to honour its pledges. The New Deal for Working People was agreed upon at the party’s national policy forum last summer, and Keir Starmer’s commitment to it remains crucial.”
The heart of the controversy lies in Labour’s stance on zero-hours contracts, affecting approximately 1.1 million workers in the UK. The original New Deal vowed to ban such contracts entirely, ensuring a minimum number of guaranteed hours for all. However, recent media commentary suggests a shift: Labour may not outright ban zero-hours contracts but will emphasize employers’ duty to provide contracts based on the preceding 12 weeks’ work.
A Labour spokesperson maintains that the New Deal remains a core part of their platform: “We will campaign vigorously on this ahead of the general election. Our commitment to delivering legislation within 100 days and consulting widely on implementation remains unchanged.”
The party’s revised plans align with decisions made at the national policy forum. These include creating a “single status” for all workers (except genuinely self-employed individuals) and reviewing parental leave within the first year of a Labour administration.
Trade union leaders are unyielding in their stance: “Any dilution of the New Deal for workers is wholly unacceptable. Labour must stand firm against corporate greed and prioritize the interests of working people. Attempts to water down this popular policy will face a robust response from the entire trade union movement.” – Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary
“Working people deserve protection from business excesses, not concessions to the super-rich. We won’t accept any weakening of workers’ rights.” – Fran Heathcote, PCS General Secretary
As the debate intensifies, the fate of the New Deal hangs in the balance, with both political and practical implications for millions of workers across the country.
In a critical moment for workers’ rights, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), led by its new president Rupert Soames, is exerting pressure on the Labour Party to reconsider its groundbreaking “New Deal for Working People.” Soames, expressing concerns about an allegedly restrictive “European model” and the potential unintended consequences of robust employment reforms, has called for a watering down of the Labour Party’s ambitious proposals.
The Labour Party’s comprehensive policy, unveiled in the “New Deal for Working People,” outlines substantial measures aimed at fortifying individual and collective rights. Among these are immediate eligibility for essential rights for all workers, a ban on exploitative zero-hours contracts, an end to misleading self-employment practices, and an overdue modernization of trade union legislation to empower workers collectively. The policy also tackles issues such as fair pay agreements, safety and autonomy at work, and the establishment of a robust social security safety net.
Yet, in the midst of these progressive proposals, the CBI insists on maintaining a flexible labor market while addressing workers’ rights. This stance raises alarms among those who fear a potential dilution of the Labour Party’s commitment to robust worker protections.
Adding historical context, critics highlight Labour’s past challenges in upholding workers’ rights. The influence of corporate interests on Tony Blair’s policies, including compromises on union legislation, transposition of European laws, and safeguards for agency and temporary workers, serves as a cautionary tale.
Amidst these concerns, unions are taking a proactive stance to ensure that the Labour Party remains true to its commitments. A historical lack of vigilance has shown the potential for outside influences to compromise workers’ rights within the Labour Party. Unions are rallying to keep a close watch on Labour, emphasizing the need for unwavering dedication to the “New Deal for Working People” and resisting any attempts to weaken vital protections for the workforce.
As the dialogue between the CBI and the Labour Party unfolds, unions are on high alert, stressing the importance of an approach that safeguards the interests of workers. The call to action is clear: unions must remain vigilant to secure the promises made in the “New Deal for Working People” and protect the hard-fought rights of workers. In this critical juncture, the commitment to a fair and just workplace depends on the collective vigilance of union, ensuring that the Labour Party stays true to its pro-worker commitments.
By Pat Harrington
This article was first published in British Worker, the weekly member’s bulletin of Solidarity union.
In a remarkable turn of events, a united front of trade unions, disabled people’s organizations, passenger groups, and countless other campaigners has succeeded in compelling the UK government to perform a humiliating U-turn on their plans to shutter hundreds of rail ticket offices in England. The Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, announced on Tuesday that the government had urged train operators to withdraw their controversial proposals, citing their failure to meet the high passenger standards expected.
Stevenage Ticket Office – just one of those saved. Picture Kollectiv Futur
This significant reversal of the Conservative Party’s position is a testament to the power of mass campaigning and the fear of electoral annihilation that has gripped the Tories. This victory showcases the importance of collective action and sends a clear message that the public will not accept the deterioration of essential services.
The objections raised against the proposals were widespread and impactful. Passenger watchdogs Transport Focus and London Travelwatch reported that they received a staggering 750,000 responses from individuals and organizations during a public consultation. These responses were characterized by “powerful and passionate concerns,” as stated by Transport Focus.
Mick Lynch, the general secretary of the RMT union, hailed this victory as a resounding one for passengers, community groups, and rail workers alike. He has called for an urgent summit involving the government, train operating companies, disabled and community organizations, and passenger groups to devise an alternative path for the rail network. Their goal is to ensure the preservation of ticket offices and station staff jobs while delivering a safe, secure, and accessible service that prioritizes passengers over profit.
The government is trying to distance itself from the proposed closures, arguing that they were not directly responsible for the plans. However, the fingerprints of the Conservative Party are all over this scheme, as they had originally approved it. Essentially, the Tories have rejected proposals that they themselves had endorsed.
The BBC reported that rail executives were “furious” over the government’s decision to backtrack, given that the original plans had been approved by the Department for Transport (DFT). A source from one of the rail companies expressed their frustration, revealing that they had been compelled to promote and defend the plans despite widespread criticism.
The victory to save ticket offices is a significant step forward, but it should not overshadow the ongoing struggle for fair wages, job security, and passenger safety within the rail industry. This achievement underscores the importance of continued action, including strikes, to push for these essential reforms.
In September, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had asserted that closing ticket offices was in the public interest, citing that only one in ten tickets was currently sold through ticket offices. The initial plans aimed to close ticket offices at 974 stations in England, but none in Scotland or Wales. However, with the overwhelming public response to the consultation, watchdogs such as Transport Focus and London Travelwatch unanimously opposed every planned closure, citing issues related to accessibility and operational concerns.
Mick Whelan, the general secretary of Aslef, highlighted that the consultation process demonstrated that almost no one, except for train companies and the Conservative Party, believed station ticket offices should be closed. The resounding support for the Save Our Ticket Offices campaign has been a victory not only for unions and campaigners but for all rail travelers.
The consensus from passengers, staff, and rail providers for the future of rail travel, as called for by National Pensioners’ Convention general secretary Jan Shortt, is now more attainable. Disabled People Against Cuts founder Linda Burnip emphasized the positive impact of this victory on disabled people, who would have been disproportionately affected by the proposed closures.
Katie Pennick, campaigns manager at accessibility charity Transport for All, aptly described this outcome as bittersweet. The proposals were indeed disastrous and discriminatory, and they should never have been put forward in the first place.
The U-turn on the ticket office closures reflects the triumph of people power, where collective action and a united front of campaigners and unions have successfully pushed back against regressive policies. It underscores the importance of vigilance and continued activism in protecting essential services and workers’ rights. Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh MP’s call for a publicly owned and unified rail network resonates strongly, offering an alternative vision that prioritizes passengers and quality service.
