The Chancellor’s Autumn Statement was billed as a turning point—a moment to reward work, ease the burden on households, and chart a course toward growth. But for millions of workers across the UK, the reality is more sobering. Behind the headlines of tax cuts and wage rises lies a fiscal strategy that continues to squeeze the very people who keep the country running.
The Tax Trap: A Freeze That Burns
The most significant move—cutting the main rate of National Insurance from 12% to 10%—was trumpeted as a tax cut for working people. But this gesture is dwarfed by the ongoing freeze on income tax thresholds, which the government has extended until 2028. This stealth tax, known as “fiscal drag,” means that as wages rise with inflation, more workers are pulled into higher tax bands.
The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that the threshold freeze will raise £44.6 billion over six years.
A worker earning £35,000 will pay around £600 more in tax by 2028 than they would have if thresholds had risen with inflation.
Over 4 million more people are expected to be dragged into paying income tax or higher-rate tax by the end of the freeze.
Solidarity’s position is clear: this is not a tax cut—it is a redistribution of burden from capital to labour, from wealth to wages. Our members are being asked to fund the state while corporations enjoy record profits and shareholder payouts.
A Welcome Rise in the Minimum Wage—But Not a Living Wage
There is, however, one area where the government deserves cautious praise. From April, the National Living Wage will rise to £12.00 an hour, up from £10.42—a 15% increase. For 21- and 22-year-olds, who were previously excluded from the full rate, this marks a long-overdue correction. The government estimates that 2.7 million workers will benefit.
In practical terms:
A full-time worker on the new minimum wage will earn £1,800 more per year.
For a 35-hour week, this equates to a gross annual income of £21,840.
This is a meaningful uplift, especially in sectors like care, hospitality, and retail, where low pay has long been entrenched. But it still falls short of the Real Living Wage, which the Living Wage Foundation calculates at £12.00 across the UK and £13.15 in London—figures based on the actual cost of living.
Solidarity welcomes the increase but urges vigilance. Without robust enforcement, rogue employers will continue to underpay staff. And without parallel investment in housing, transport, and childcare, even £12 an hour will not deliver genuine security.
The Wider Labour Movement Responds
Across the trade union movement, the response to the Budget has been scathing. Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, dismissed the Chancellor’s statement as “a cynical attempt to buy votes with one hand while picking workers’ pockets with the other.” She pointed to the lack of investment in public services and the continued erosion of real wages across the public sector.
Paul Nowak, General Secretary of the TUC, was equally forthright: “This Budget does nothing to fix the cost-of-living crisis. The Chancellor is giving with one hand and taking far more with the other. Working people will still be worse off at the next election than they were at the last.”
Gary Smith of the GMB highlighted the regional disparities: “This Budget does nothing for the care workers in Glasgow, the refuse collectors in Newcastle, or the NHS porters in Cardiff. It’s a Budget for the boardroom, not the break room.”
These critiques reflect a shared frustration: that the government continues to prioritise headline-grabbing tax tweaks over the structural investment needed to rebuild public services, tackle inequality, and deliver a fairer economy.
Scotland’s Workers: Caught in the Crossfire
For workers in Scotland, the Budget’s contradictions are especially stark. While the minimum wage rise will offer some relief, the tax freeze will hit hard. Scotland’s devolved income tax system already imposes higher rates on middle earners, and the UK-wide threshold freeze compounds this burden.
A Scottish worker earning £30,000 will pay around £1,500 more in income tax and National Insurance than someone on the same salary in England.
Public sector workers in Scotland, already facing pay restraint, will see little benefit from the Chancellor’s headline measures.
Solidarity calls for a coordinated response from Holyrood and Westminster to ensure that wage gains are not clawed back through stealth taxation. We also urge the Scottish Government to match the minimum wage uplift across all public sector contracts and to accelerate the rollout of collective bargaining in social care.
A Budget for Whom?
The Autumn Statement reveals a government more concerned with optics than outcomes. The Chancellor’s tax cut may dominate the headlines, but the underlying reality is one of continued austerity by stealth. Public services remain underfunded, local authorities face bankruptcy, and the social safety net is threadbare.
Meanwhile, the wealthiest continue to benefit from capital gains tax breaks, non-dom status, and corporate loopholes. The burden of funding the state has shifted decisively onto the shoulders of working people.
Solidarity stands with our fellow unions in demanding a new economic settlement—one that prioritises public investment, fair taxation, and decent work. We will continue to fight for a future where wages rise with dignity, not just inflation, and where the fruits of growth are shared by all, not hoarded by the few.
The Solidarity union has thrown its full weight behind the campaign to raise Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) in the UK. At just £109.40 per week, SSP currently amounts to less than £3 per hour for a full-time worker. This figure falls shockingly short of the minimum wage, leaving sick workers struggling to cover basic living costs. The inadequacy of SSP has been a long-standing issue, but the cost-of-living crisis has brought its dire consequences into sharper focus.
A Global Perspective
When compared to other developed nations, the UK’s SSP is embarrassingly low. In Germany, sick workers can receive up to 70% of their salary for a duration of up to 78 weeks. France offers 50% of the worker’s salary for up to six months, with additional employer contributions often making up the difference. Meanwhile, the UK’s flat-rate SSP not only fails to account for actual earnings but is also among the lowest in the OECD. It’s a policy that punishes the sick and entrenches inequality.
Labour’s Silence is Deafening
While unions like Solidarity are leading the call for reform, the Labour Party has been disappointingly quiet. This is particularly troubling given Labour’s historic commitment to workers’ rights. The party’s leadership has yet to outline a clear policy on SSP, leaving many to wonder whether it is truly prepared to champion the needs of working people. Solidarity is urging Labour to step up and back a meaningful increase in SSP that reflects the cost of living and restores dignity to workers.
Unions United
Solidarity is not alone in this fight. The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has repeatedly called for SSP to be raised to match the real living wage. Unite the Union and GMB have also highlighted the human cost of low SSP, citing examples of workers who have been forced to choose between health and financial survival. This coalition of voices underscores the growing recognition that the UK’s sick pay system is broken and in urgent need of reform.
A Call for Action
Pat Harrington, General Secretary of the Solidarity union, has been unequivocal in his demand for change: “The current rate of SSP is not just inadequate; it’s an insult to working people. No one should have to face financial ruin because they’re too unwell to work. Solidarity is committed to campaigning for an increase that brings SSP in line with the real living wage. We call on the government and the Labour Party to address this injustice without delay.”
What’s Next?
The campaign to raise SSP is gaining momentum, but it will take sustained pressure to achieve meaningful change. Solidarity is calling on all workers to join the fight, whether by supporting union campaigns, contacting their MPs, or sharing their stories of how low SSP has affected them. Together, we can push for a system that values health and protects the vulnerable.
It’s time for the UK to catch up with the rest of the developed world and ensure that no worker is left behind when they need support the most.
Welcome to Union News your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reports are by Pat Harrington and original music is from Tim Bragg. In this edition: First Bus Accused of Undermining Strikers’ Call for Real Living Wage, Victory for Low-Paid School Workers in John Swinney’s Constituency, Bolt Drivers Win Landmark Case Over Gig Economy Exploitation, G4S Security Workers Demand Equal Pay and Respect, and UN: Israel’s Gaza Attacks Kill Nearly 70% Civilians, Mostly Women and Children.
First Bus Accused of Undermining Strikers’ Call for Real Living Wage
Workers at First South Yorkshire are calling out their employer for hypocrisy after the company claimed to support their fight for the Real Living Wage while secretly undermining their ongoing strike. The workers, employed by contractor Bidvest Noonan at Sheffield’s Olive Grove depot, have been on strike for two months, demanding a pay increase from the current minimum wage of £11.44 per hour to £13.85 – the Real Living Wage. Unite the Union claims that instead of supporting their workers, First Bus has been using its own staff to cover duties during the strike, including moving buses in the depot, directly weakening the impact of the industrial action.
Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham accused First Bus of making false public statements about supporting the wage increase, while doing everything in its power to break the strike. “The hypocrisy of First West Yorkshire is astounding,” Graham said. “The reality is that First is actively trying to break the strike and keep workers on poverty wages.” The workers’ fight is a crucial one, not only for fair pay but for respect and dignity in the workplace, with the union vowing to continue the action until the Real Living Wage is implemented.
The dispute at First South Yorkshire highlights a wider issue within the transport and service industries, where many workers are struggling to make ends meet despite working full-time. With rising costs of living and increasing pressure on low-paid workers, the call for the Real Living Wage is louder than ever. Unite has pledged to escalate its support for these workers, warning that the strike will continue until First and Bidvest Noonan are forced to come to the negotiating table.
Victory for Low-Paid School Workers in John Swinney’s Constituency
Striking non-teaching staff in Perthshire North have secured a significant victory after pressure from Unison led to a credible new pay offer from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla). The workers, including cleaners and support staff in local schools, had been on strike for two weeks in a battle for a pay rise, rejecting an initial offer of just 3.6%. Despite resistance from the Scottish government and Cosla’s insistence that there were no more funds available, the workers won a revised offer that includes a £15 per hour minimum wage and a 5.6% raise for the lowest-paid staff.
Unison’s Collette Hunter hailed the agreement as a major success for the workers, saying that their industrial action had forced the Scottish government to come to the table and engage seriously with the issue. “We’ve secured these commitments thanks to the determination of our members and the solidarity they showed on the picket lines,” Hunter said. The new offer is a direct result of sustained pressure on Cosla and the Scottish government, who now face the task of addressing the broader funding crisis in local councils.
However, the battle isn’t over. Cosla is still grappling with a massive budget shortfall, and workers’ unions are calling for more significant action to ensure that the funding crisis doesn’t undermine the gains made by these workers. With a new round of negotiations expected in December, trade unions are urging the Scottish government to allocate more funds to local councils to prevent further cuts to essential services. The struggle for fair wages and proper funding continues.
Bolt Drivers Win Landmark Case Over Gig Economy Exploitation
In a major victory for gig economy workers, Bolt drivers have won a groundbreaking legal case that could see each of the 15,000 affected drivers receive an estimated £15,000 in backdated compensation for underpayment. The ruling, which goes further than the previous Supreme Court case against Uber, determines that Bolt drivers are not self-employed contractors but workers, entitled to minimum wage and holiday pay. Leigh Day, the firm representing the drivers, confirmed that the compensation package could reach up to £200 million across the UK.
This ruling is a significant blow to gig economy giants like Bolt, which have long relied on classifying drivers as independent contractors to avoid providing basic worker rights such as paid sick leave, holiday pay, and minimum wage. GMB’s Eamon O’Hearn celebrated the decision, calling it a major victory for workers in the gig economy, but warned that the battle is far from over. “This ruling confirms what we’ve been saying all along: gig workers deserve the same rights and protections as any other worker,” O’Hearn said.
While Bolt has expressed disappointment and indicated plans to appeal the decision, unions are calling for broader legislative changes to protect gig workers across the UK. App Drivers & Couriers Union General Secretary Zamir Dreni emphasized that the government must act to fix the gaps in current employment laws, which have allowed companies like Bolt and Uber to exploit workers for too long. The fight for fair pay and conditions in the gig economy is gaining momentum, with workers and unions pushing for systemic change to ensure that all workers are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.
G4S Security Workers Demand Equal Pay and Respect
Security workers employed by multinational G4S to serve at government departments in central London are demanding an end to poverty wages and the same pay and conditions as their directly employed civil service counterparts. The workers, who are striking outside Whitehall for the second week, have been offered a paltry 5p pay rise by the company, a proposal which has been roundly rejected by PCS union members. The workers, who are vital to maintaining security at government buildings, argue that G4S is making massive profits while cutting essential benefits for its staff—an injustice they are determined to fight.
“We’re being asked to do the same job as civil servants, but with far less pay and fewer rights. G4S is pocketing huge profits, while we struggle to make ends meet,” one striker explained. “They outsourced our jobs to cut costs, but that’s meant fewer benefits for us. We have no guaranteed sick pay, no maternity or paternity leave, and the little we do get is far less than what our colleagues in the civil service enjoy. Meanwhile, the government continues to fund these private companies through taxpayers’ money, yet refuses to ensure that we’re paid fairly for the crucial work we do.” For these workers, the fight is not just about pay—it’s about ensuring that essential workers are not treated as disposable commodities in a privatised system that profits at their expense.
The mood on the picket line is upbeat and defiant, as strikers bring energy and unity to the streets of Whitehall. “This isn’t just about us getting a better pay deal,” said Mohammed, a striker who is participating in his first strike action. “This is about showing that we deserve the same respect as those who work directly for the government. The company has been treating us like second-class citizens for too long, and we won’t let that continue.” The strikers, a diverse group representing different cultures and backgrounds, have been using music, whistles, and chants to bring attention to their cause, demonstrating their resolve and solidarity. “The more we strike, the more we gain confidence,” Mohammed added. “At first, we didn’t know how to go about it, but now we’ve got our voices heard. Our spirits are unbreakable, and we’re here until we win what we deserve.” The growing strength of their collective action is sending a powerful message: these workers will no longer be ignored.
and finally, UN: Israel’s Gaza Attacks Kill Nearly 70% Civilians, Mostly Women and Children
A new UN report reveals that almost 70 percent of those killed in Israeli airstrikes on Gaza over the past six months were civilians, with women and children bearing the brunt of the violence. The report, released today by the UN Human Rights Office, details the disproportionate impact on Gaza’s most vulnerable populations, calling Israel’s actions a violation of international law and warning that war crimes may have been committed.
From November 2023 to April 2024, 8,119 Palestinians were killed, with 44 percent of victims being children and 26 percent women. The report highlights that many of the deaths occurred in residential buildings, where around 80 percent of the casualties were trapped in their homes when Israeli bombs struck. The UN has condemned Israel’s use of heavy weaponry in such densely populated areas, pointing to a blatant disregard for civilian life.
“The killing and injury of civilians on this scale is a direct consequence of Israel’s failure to comply with international humanitarian law,” said Volker Turk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. “There must be accountability for these violations.”
Israel maintains that its military operations are aimed at Hamas, but has yet to provide evidence of its claims that Palestinian fighters are using civilians as human shields. Despite these assertions, the ongoing siege and airstrikes continue to devastate Gaza, with 39 Palestinians reported killed and over 120 injured in Israeli attacks today.
As the crisis deepens, international calls for justice grow louder, urging accountability for the mass civilian deaths and the continued siege of Gaza.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg. This week: ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action, Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute, Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul, and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy.
ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action
Rail passengers across the United Kingdom are facing significant disruptions due to strike action as a consequence of the failure of rail companies and government to resolve a two-year-long dispute over pay and working conditions. Train drivers affiliated with the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) are striking. The strikes have already begun and will continue on Wednesday and Thursday. Drivers are also banning overtime until Saturday, exacerbating the situation.
Southeastern, Southern, Thameslink, and Gatwick Express routes are the services affected.
The dispute centers around pay. ASLEF members have not received a pay rise in five years, leading to frustration and industrial action. formal talks between the operators and the union have not occurred for a year, making this the longest-ever rail industry dispute.
As action continues, commuters are left grappling with disrupted travel plans, and the pressure mounts on the government and rail companies involved to seek a resolution with ASLEF. Stay tuned for further updates as the situation unfolds.
Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute
In a bold move, more than 1,000 security guards employed by G4S at Jobcentres across the country are set to walk out in a 24-hour strike starting tonight. The dispute centres around pay, with guards demanding fair compensation for their crucial role.
The GMB union, representing these guards, revealed that a recent survey found alarming rates of abuse suffered by its members. Shockingly, four out of five guards reported incidents of physical violence, including dog attacks and assaults by members of the public.
But it’s not just physical harm they face. Guards also endure daily verbal abuse, ranging from threats against their families to racist slurs and even death threats.
The strike action is scheduled for multiple dates, including May 13, 20, 28, and 29. GMB national officer Eamon O’Hearn emphasized the immense pressure these guards operate under, stating, “G4S and the Department for Work and Pensions are content to let guards scrape by on minimum wage. These survey results underscore the urgent need for change.”
This marks the first time that guards have united to demand better conditions. A spokesperson for G4S expressed disappointment at the decision and stated that the company is still attempting to reach an amicable agreement.
Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul
In a move that has sparked heated debate, the UK government has unveiled proposals to overhaul the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. While the government aims to address rising costs and streamline support, unions and disabled rights campaigners have raised serious objections.
Here’s what critics are saying about the proposed changes:
Charities and advocacy groups have labelled the government’s plans as “dangerous” and “reckless.” They argue that restricting access to PIP and replacing regular cash payments with other forms of provision could have devastating consequences for disabled individuals. Concerns centre around the potential impact on vulnerable claimants who rely on consistent financial support. One-off grants may not adequately meet ongoing needs, leading to increased hardship.
The government’s emphasis on mental health conditions in the proposed reforms has drawn criticism. While it acknowledges the rise in PIP claims related to mental health, campaigners worry that the changes may inadvertently harm those with invisible disabilities3. Critics argue that lump-sum grants may not address the ongoing challenges faced by individuals with fluctuating conditions. Regular cash payments provide stability, whereas one-off grants may fall short.
Disabled rights campaigners emphasize the need for a fair and compassionate welfare system. While the government aims to target support more accurately, critics fear that vulnerable claimants could slip through the cracks.
Removing the PIP assessment altogether for certain health conditions or disabilities may simplify bureaucracy, but it must not compromise essential assistance for those most in need.
As consultations begin, the government faces mounting pressure to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and safeguarding the well-being of disabled individuals. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of disability benefits in the UK.
and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy
In a dramatic turn of events, several unions have issued stern warnings to the Labour Party, urging them not to dilute their proposed New Deal for Working People. Recent reports in the Financial Times suggest that the party may be reconsidering some of its earlier commitments, leading to concerns among labour advocates.
Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, minced no words: “Choosing May Day to signal a retreat from overhauling one of Europe’s worst employment rights frameworks is beyond ironic. If Labour fails to explicitly reaffirm their promise that the New Deal for Workers will be fully implemented within the first 100 days of office, they will cross a red line.”
The GMB union echoes the sentiment: “Working people are desperate for change, and we expect Labour to honour its pledges. The New Deal for Working People was agreed upon at the party’s national policy forum last summer, and Keir Starmer’s commitment to it remains crucial.”
The heart of the controversy lies in Labour’s stance on zero-hours contracts, affecting approximately 1.1 million workers in the UK. The original New Deal vowed to ban such contracts entirely, ensuring a minimum number of guaranteed hours for all. However, recent media commentary suggests a shift: Labour may not outright ban zero-hours contracts but will emphasize employers’ duty to provide contracts based on the preceding 12 weeks’ work.
A Labour spokesperson maintains that the New Deal remains a core part of their platform: “We will campaign vigorously on this ahead of the general election. Our commitment to delivering legislation within 100 days and consulting widely on implementation remains unchanged.”
The party’s revised plans align with decisions made at the national policy forum. These include creating a “single status” for all workers (except genuinely self-employed individuals) and reviewing parental leave within the first year of a Labour administration.
Trade union leaders are unyielding in their stance: “Any dilution of the New Deal for workers is wholly unacceptable. Labour must stand firm against corporate greed and prioritize the interests of working people. Attempts to water down this popular policy will face a robust response from the entire trade union movement.” – Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary
“Working people deserve protection from business excesses, not concessions to the super-rich. We won’t accept any weakening of workers’ rights.” – Fran Heathcote, PCS General Secretary
As the debate intensifies, the fate of the New Deal hangs in the balance, with both political and practical implications for millions of workers across the country.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reports are by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits, SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers, Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns, Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers, and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote.
Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ignited a firestorm with his unveiling of sweeping changes to disability benefits, sparking accusations of a “full-on assault” on disabled individuals. Sunak’s proposals include stringent reforms to the Personal Independent Payment (PIP) system, aiming to tighten eligibility criteria and introduce greater medical scrutiny for claimants.
In response to what he termed a “sick-note culture,” Sunak also announced plans to shift responsibility for sick notes away from GPs, igniting concerns among mental health advocates already grappling with overstretched services. Critics argue that the proposed changes risk plunging disabled people into destitution, with some accusing the government of targeting the most vulnerable amidst economic challenges.
Furthermore, Sunak’s pledge to sanction benefits for non-compliance with work coach conditions, along with the threat of benefit removal after 12 months of unemployment, has drawn sharp rebuke from welfare organizations, who argue that punitive measures exacerbate financial insecurity and undermine public trust.
As debate intensifies, concerns over the broader impact on NHS waiting lists and workforce shortages loom large, with calls for a more compassionate approach to welfare reform that prioritizes holistic support and addresses systemic complexities.
SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers
In a surprising turn of events, the SNP-Green coalition in Scotland, backed by Tory MSPs, has quashed Scottish Labour MSP Mark Griffin’s bid to bolster assistance for workers injured on the job. Griffin’s Employment Injuries Advisory Council (SEIAC) Bill aimed not only to establish a new employment injury benefit but also to institute a council of experts, including trade unions, to guide its implementation and monitor progress.
Despite SNP First Minister Humza Yousaf’s recent pledges to prioritize support for workers and their families, his government’s alliance with Tory MSPs led to the rejection of the legislation. SNP social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville defended the decision, stating, “We do not need this Bill,” while acknowledging Griffin’s efforts and their potential contribution to future initiatives.
Reacting to the outcome, Griffin expressed disappointment, accusing the government of abandoning frontline workers grappling with long-term effects of Covid-19, firefighters battling cancer, and former footballers afflicted by dementia. He criticized Yousaf’s administration for failing to accelerate progress toward a more equitable industrial injuries system in Scotland and vowed to continue advocating for workers’ rights.
The contentious rejection underscores tensions within Scottish politics over strategies to address worker welfare and underscores the challenges facing efforts to enact meaningful legislative reforms.
Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns
A recent survey conducted by the Sutton Trust has shed light on the concerning trend of staff cuts in schools across the UK, prompting teaching unions to criticize the government’s handling of education funding. According to the survey, more than two-thirds of senior leaders in schools reported having to reduce the number of teaching assistants this year.
Additionally, one in three senior leaders stated that they had to cut teaching staff, while nearly half had to reduce support staff. The impact was particularly pronounced in primary schools, where teaching assistant cuts were highest, while secondary schools experienced greater losses in both teaching and support staff.
Reacting to these findings, Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, expressed shock at the extent of the cuts, noting that three-quarters of primary schools had to reduce the number of teaching assistants to make ends meet. He criticized the government’s lack of seriousness regarding education funding and urged it to wake up to the reality faced by schools nationwide.
Dr. Patrick Roach, the general secretary of NASUWT, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing that children from less affluent backgrounds are disproportionately affected by these cuts, resulting in a compromised quality of education. He criticized the government’s failure to invest adequately in education and called for a new government to address the ongoing crisis in schools.
In response, the Department for Education defended its stance, stating that school funding has been increased to £60.7 billion this year, the highest level ever in real terms per pupil. However, critics argue that despite the increase in funding, the allocation is insufficient to meet the growing needs of schools, leading to staff cuts and resource reallocation.
As the debate over education funding intensifies, the future of staffing levels and the quality of education in UK schools remains uncertain, with calls for comprehensive solutions to address the funding gap and ensure equitable access to education for all students.
Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers
A landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court this week has bolstered the position of workers facing penalties or discrimination for engaging in strike action. The ruling, which criticizes British trade union laws for inadequately protecting workers’ rights, marks a significant victory for labour rights advocates.
In a scathing critique, the court highlighted the failure of current legislation to shield workers from sanctions short of dismissal during strikes, deeming it incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Lady Ingrid Simler, delivering the judgment, emphasized that the ability of employers to impose punitive measures undermines the fundamental right to lawful strike action.
The case, brought forward by the Unison union on behalf of care worker Fiona Mercer, sheds light on the plight of workers facing repercussions for participating in industrial action. Mercer’s battle against her employer, Alternative Futures Group (AFG), over cuts to payments for sleep-in shifts, exemplifies the challenges workers encounter when asserting their rights.
Despite initial victories in lower courts, the intervention of high-ranking figures sought to overturn favourable rulings, prompting Unison to escalate the case to the Supreme Court. Following the verdict, Mercer expressed satisfaction, stating that while it wouldn’t change her experience, it would serve as a deterrent to unscrupulous employers.
Unison’s general secretary, Christina McAnea, hailed the ruling as the most significant industrial action case in decades, while Paul Nowak of the TUC described it as a monumental victory for the union movement. However, some caution against excessive optimism, noting that the legal landscape still poses challenges to effective labour activism.
Nevertheless, the judgment is seen as a positive step forward, prompting calls for broader campaigns to defend workers’ rights. The implications extend beyond the immediate case, with university lecturers and other workers hopeful for redress for past punitive actions taken against them.
and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote
In a significant development, Amazon has been dealt a decisive setback as the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) ruled in favour of GMB’s union recognition application at its Coventry warehouse. The ruling marks a milestone in GMB’s efforts and brings Europe one step closer to witnessing the first recognized union at Amazon.
After over a year of industrial action and 30 strike days, the CAC’s decision signals a turning point in the ongoing struggle for union representation at the tech giant’s facilities. The committee has mandated that an independent organization be appointed to oversee a legally binding vote of workers, indicating a crucial phase in the process.
Amanda Gearing, senior organizer at GMB, hailed the ruling as a historic moment in the battle for workers’ rights at Amazon. She likened the journey to a modern-day David and Goliath struggle, emphasizing the resilience of workers against the company’s formidable anti-union tactics.
Gearing highlighted the demands of Amazon workers for fair wages and safe working conditions, stressing the importance of dignity at work and the need for a union to advocate for their interests.
In response to the ruling, an Amazon spokesperson reiterated the company’s stance on employee rights, stating, “Our employees have the choice of whether or not to join a union. They always have.”
As the process moves forward, anticipation mounts for the upcoming ballot, with workers poised to make a crucial decision that could reshape the landscape of labour relations within Amazon’s operations. The outcome of the vote holds implications not only for the Coventry warehouse but also for the broader discourse on workers’ rights and unionization in the tech industry.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement in the UK. Writing is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: reports from the Scottish TUC conference, Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court, New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’ and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster.
Scottish trade unions oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors
During the initial session of the annual Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), delegates voiced strong support for defending Scotland’s NHS and criticized the SNP-Green Scottish government’s longstanding plans for a national care service (NCS).
Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.
Unison has consistently raised concerns about the NCS proposals, arguing that while they suggest a publicly owned and accountable organization akin to the NHS, they would actually result in much of the care sector being controlled by the voluntary sector and private companies.
Key points of contention include the lack of national sectoral bargaining, reduced local democratic oversight, and the potential side-lining of council social work departments as primary care providers.
Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.
Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatization” of Scotland’s NHS.
The motion called for the STUC to build on previous successes in advocating for progressive tax measures to generate additional funds for public services. It also proposed conducting research to expose instances of backdoor privatization within the NHS in Scotland.
Drew Gilchrist of the North Lanarkshire TUC, himself an NHS worker, stressed the importance of such research in mobilizing a campaign to stop and reverse privatization while advocating for increased investment in services and the workforce.
Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.
Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court
Parcelforce delivery drivers, who are members of the IWGB union, are taking legal action against Royal Mail, alleging that they have been unfairly denied fundamental rights. These drivers argue that they have been misclassified in their employment status and deprived of basic entitlements. The lawsuit, which could involve thousands of Parcelforce drivers across the UK, seeks to compel Royal Mail to compensate them for potential shortfalls in their pay, which could amount to millions.
Previously categorized as self-employed ‘owner drivers,’ many Parcelforce drivers were denied rights such as the National Living Wage and holiday pay. Leigh Day, the legal firm representing the drivers, contends that they should be classified as ‘workers,’ affording them greater rights and potential compensation for past discrepancies in pay.
Concerns were initially raised by three drivers who sought assistance from their union, the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB). With support from the IWGB and legal representation from Leigh Day, these drivers brought claims to the Employment Tribunal. Recognizing the broader implications of these issues, Leigh Day expanded the case into a group claim.
This legal challenge against Royal Mail follows a significant precedent set in a previous case involving Uber drivers, wherein the Supreme Court ruled in favour of classifying them as workers rather than self-employed contractors. This landmark decision laid the groundwork for similar disputes across the gig economy, offering hope to Parcelforce drivers seeking justice.
Marc Francis, a former Parcelforce delivery driver, recounts his experience of working without rights or protections, emphasizing the need for justice for himself and his fellow drivers. The IWGB echoes these sentiments, condemning Royal Mail’s alleged exploitation of its workers and urging affected drivers to join the claim for rightful compensation.
Liana Wood, a solicitor at Leigh Day, emphasizes the importance of recognizing Parcelforce drivers as entitled to workers’ rights, including holiday pay and the national minimum wage. With deteriorating working conditions and decreasing take-home pay, thousands of owner drivers are believed to be eligible to participate in the claim for fair treatment.
STUC Congress Grapples with Cuts: Calls for No-Cuts Budgets
At the STUC Congress in Dundee this month, discussions were dominated by the impact of cuts across Scottish councils, leading to significant job losses over the past 15 years. While calls to support no-cuts budgets were made, they did not gain widespread backing. Clydebank TUC proposed backing such budgets as a strategy to challenge austerity policies, but the general council raised concerns about legality and called for a more practical approach.
Despite this, trades union councils from North Lanarkshire, Fife, and Dundee supported Clydebank’s motion with fervent speeches defending council workers and services. Fife’s Tam Kirby criticized the general council’s cautious approach, arguing for a more aggressive stance against cuts, even if it meant challenging the law.
Referring to STUC president Mike Arnott’s earlier address, Dundee’s Stuart Fairweather emphasized the need for councillors to champion their areas and oppose cuts rather than passively implementing them.
Closing the debate, Clydebank’s Janet Cassidy acknowledged the likely defeat of the motion but stressed the ongoing demand for political challenge against cuts.
Despite support from most trades councils, the motion was ultimately defeated in a card vote. Reflecting on the outcome, delegate Tam Morrison highlighted the urgent need to end cuts, emphasizing that past approaches have failed to prevent significant job losses. While the vote didn’t go their way, the case against cuts remains compelling, signalling a call to grassroots action to bring about change.
Support for key postal service at STUC conference
The Scottish Trade Union Congress has unanimously supported efforts to safeguard essential postal services and protect postal workers.
There are growing concerns among both workers and customers about the potential threat to the universal service obligation (USO) provided by Royal Mail. This obligation ensures a consistent, one-price delivery service across the UK six days a week. Despite earlier assurances from former business secretary, Vince Cable, regarding the preservation of the USO following Royal Mail’s privatization, there are now indications that the company may seek to abandon this guarantee.
Craig Anderson, regional secretary of the Communication Workers Union, expressed appreciation for the congress’s endorsement of the union’s campaign to not only defend the USO but also to enhance the role of postal workers within communities. Anderson emphasized the broader significance of Royal Mail’s services beyond delivering letters and parcels, emphasizing their role in connecting and supporting communities.
He stressed the importance of prioritizing communities and preserving the USO as a crucial element in maintaining social cohesion. Anderson called for Royal Mail and regulators to support the service, support the workers, and invest in the future of public postal services rather than succumbing to cost-cutting measures.
Scottish trade unions come together to oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors
During the initial session of the annual Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), delegates voiced strong support for defending Scotland’s NHS and criticized the SNP-Green Scottish government’s longstanding plans for a national care service (NCS).
Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.
Unison has consistently raised concerns about the NCS proposals, arguing that while they suggest a publicly owned and accountable organization akin to the NHS, they would actually result in much of the care sector being controlled by the voluntary sector and private companies.
Key points of contention include the lack of national sectoral bargaining, reduced local democratic oversight, and the potential side-lining of council social work departments as primary care providers.
Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.
Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatisation” of Scotland’s NHS.
The motion called for the STUC to build on previous successes in advocating for progressive tax measures to generate additional funds for public services. It also proposed conducting research to expose instances of backdoor privatization within the NHS in Scotland.
Drew Gilchrist of the North Lanarkshire TUC, himself an NHS worker, stressed the importance of such research in mobilizing a campaign to stop and reverse privatization while advocating for increased investment in services and the workforce.
Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.
New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’
Over half of NHS workers suffer from poor mental health, and one in four has even considered suicide due to the challenges they face.
NHS Charities Together say that 52 percent of staff suffer anxiety and 51 percent suffer from low mood.
Frontline 19 has a campaign highlighting that, in many cases, NHS staff are sicker than the patients they are treating.
Group founder Claire Goodwin-Fee said: “The most common reason for sickness absence was poor mental health, responsible for over half a million days lost in one month.”
You can watch the campaign video titled “Sicker Than The Patients” on their website. Frontline19 is a free and confidential service specifically designed for frontline workers, including those in the National Health Service and other frontline services in the UK.
and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster
Water companies have handed nearly 80 billion to investors since the industry was privatised more than 30 years ago.
Since the privatization of England’s water companies in 1989, they have consistently paid out substantial dividends to shareholders.
English water companies are estimated to pay around £14.7 billion in dividends by the end of this decade.
These dividends benefit shareholders but come at a cost to customers, who are also footing the bill for sewage cleanup and other investments.
When water companies were privatized, they were debt-free. Thatcher wrote off the industry’s £5 billion debt at public expense. However, over the years, they have accumulated significant debt again.
As of now, the big nine water companies in England have a combined debt of £54 billion. This debt burden has raised concerns, especially considering the critical role water companies play in maintaining infrastructure and environmental standards.
Gary Smith of trade union GMB said: “Splashing out fortunes in dividends while racking up enormous debts is a farce.”
The average water and sewage bill in England and Wales rose from £408 in 2021 to £448 from the start of this month. And huge bill increases are expected between 2025 and 2030 to help fund long-overdue investment.
Water companies have also faced criticism for paying large sums to executives while dealing with issues like leaky infrastructure and sewage dumping.
A Solidarity union spokeswoman commented: “Water privatisation has been a disaster. Years of under investment while debt mounted and dividends were paid out. Now customers will be asked to make that money up through higher prices. The obvious answer to this mismanagement is nationalisation but the level of debt built up is one it would be challenging for the State to take on – 54 billion, a far cry from the 5 billion debt written off in 1979 to pave the way for privatisation. Many still believe nationalisation is the way forward but it will be a difficult path now.”
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and Labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: Salaried Workers Face Minimum Wage Cheating: Unions Sound the Alarm, Teachers Rally for Fair Pay and Improved Conditions at NASUWT Conference, and GMB Secures Day One Sick Pay for 19,000 Care Workers.
Salaried Workers Face Minimum Wage Cheating: Unions Sound the Alarm
Unions are cautioning that office workers and other salaried staff may be vulnerable to being short-changed on the minimum wage.
Prior to the implementation of the new minimum wage rate on Monday, the TUC highlighted that salaried employees receive a fixed annual payment irrespective of fluctuations in their working hours.
According to the TUC, online job postings still advertise salaried positions below the upcoming minimum wage, potentially resulting in illegal underpayment for salaried workers if their salaries remain stagnant.
The TUC further warned that desk-based office workers often face expectations of unpaid overtime as part of their job responsibilities.
Paul Nowak, TUC’s general secretary, emphasized, “Employers have a legal obligation to pay their workers at least the minimum wage. However, many workers are being deprived of their rightful pay by unscrupulous employers who opt to pay unlawfully low wages. This issue affects workers across various professions, including desk-based office roles, where the expectation of unpaid overtime is common.”
Highlighting the disparity between the official adult minimum wage rate of £11.44 per hour and the voluntary “real” living wage of £12, and £13.15 in London, Katherine Chapman, director of the Living Wage Foundation, stated, “While the increase in the statutory national living wage is positive news for millions of low-paid workers, it still falls short of adequately addressing the true cost of living. Over 14,000 employers have pledged to pay the real living wage, recognizing its benefits not only for workers and their families but also for businesses in terms of improved staff retention and productivity.”
Responding to these concerns, a government spokesperson reiterated that paying the minimum wage is a legal requirement for all workers, including those in office roles. The spokesperson urged any employees who suspect they are not receiving their correct wages to either address the matter with their employer or seek assistance from Acas confidentially. Furthermore, the spokesperson highlighted the significant increase in the national living wage for workers aged 21 and above, emphasizing the positive impact this will have on their annual earnings.
Teachers Rally for Fair Pay and Improved Conditions at NASUWT Conference
At NASUWT’s annual conference, teachers unite behind a push for pay restoration and better working conditions. According to the union, classroom teachers have seen their starting salaries plummet by 21% in real terms between 2010 and 2023, adjusting for RPI inflation.
Addressing the assembly, senior vice-president Wayne Broom emphasized the urgency of tackling the crisis in teaching recruitment, retention, and morale. He pledged the union’s commitment to lobby all political parties ahead of the general election to secure a new deal for teachers, including real terms pay restoration nationwide.
The proposed deal also seeks to enhance measures protecting teachers from violence, assault, or harassment, establish a national framework for statutory contractual conditions of service, enforce a maximum 35-hour working time limit, and ensure equal rights for supply and substitute teachers.
and finally, GMB Secures Day One Sick Pay for 19,000 Care Workers
In a landmark victory for the care sector, the GMB union has secured day one sick pay for 19,000 care workers. This significant win comes as HC-One, the UK’s largest care provider, agrees to a pay deal granting carers the contractual right to receive at least Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) from the first day of any absence.
Previously, carers faced a three-day waiting period before receiving sick pay, creating a concerning incentive for workers to continue working while unwell and potentially spreading illnesses among the vulnerable individuals they care for.
The breakthrough agreement follows a GMB survey revealing that one in four HC-One care workers were contemplating leaving their jobs due to inadequate pay.
Natalie Grayson, GMB National Officer, expressed outrage at the previous lack of sick pay provisions, stating, “For any worker to suffer financial hardship due to illness is unacceptable. However, in the care sector, this issue is particularly alarming and poses a significant risk to the well-being of those under their care.”
She continued, “Day one sick pay is a fundamental right that care sector workers deserve. This victory signifies a pivotal moment in the culture of the entire care industry. But our fight doesn’t end here. GMB will continue to advocate until these dedicated professionals receive a fair wage of at least £15 per hour.”
The agreement marks a crucial step forward in ensuring the welfare of care workers and underscores the ongoing efforts to address longstanding issues within the sector.
Welcome to Union News, your weekly podcast of reports from the Trade Union and labour movement in the UK. In this week’s edition: Junior Doctors Set to Launch Major Strikes, Challenging Tories and Hospital Bosses in Pay Battle, Successful Edinburgh Meeting Calls for an End to the War in Ukraine, 20,000 Rail Workers to Strike in July Amid Pay Dispute with Train Operators, Xplore Dundee bus workers resume strike action over rejected pay offer, Amazon workers in Coventry set to strike for three days during Prime week, warns GMB, North-West University Support Staff Escalate Strikes Demanding Fair Pay, and finally, Sun Editorial shows need for a pro-union Counter Media. Music is by Tim Bragg.
Junior Doctors escalate strikes
Junior doctors are preparing for a major block of strikes, aiming to challenge the government and hospital administrators. The upcoming five-day strike, scheduled for July 13, will be the longest single walkout in NHS history. The British Medical Association (BMA) has called for fair pay, demanding a 35 percent rise to bring salaries back to 2008 levels. The announcement coincided with the closing of a strike ballot by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN). If the RCN members vote in favor of striking, there may be joint action with the BMA. The BMA highlights the government’s lack of commitment to resolving the dispute, with no effort made to reopen negotiations. The ongoing NHS pay battle seeks to address the workforce crisis, with millions on waiting lists for treatment and thousands of unfilled doctor positions. The escalation of the pay campaign is crucial, and the support of all trade unionists on hospital picket lines is essential. The BMA is currently balloting hospital consultants, and their strike is planned for July 20 and 21. While simultaneous strikes by junior doctors and consultants could pose a significant challenge to the government, the BMA has ruled out such action at this time. However, united NHS strikes have the potential to force the government to address the pay issue.
Successful Edinburgh Meeting Calls for an End to the War in Ukraine
On Saturday 24th of June a rally was held next to the Holyrood Parliament in Edinburgh with the object stated as addressing: “The recklessness of British policy on Ukraine is a threat to us all and to world peace. Send out a strong message and reaffirm our democratic right to assembly and free speech: End this war!”
In glorious summer sunshine the crowd heard speeches from, amongst others, Brian Gerrish of the UK Column, Lauren Wilson of the Workers Party of Britain and Peter Ford, former ambassador to Bahrain and Syria.
20,000 Rail Workers to Strike in July Amid Pay Dispute with Train Operators
Approximately 20,000 rail workers are set to go on strike in July as part of a nationwide rail dispute. The strike action comes after train operators rejected a new pay offer, backed by the Tories who support the privatised rail firms. Members of the RMT union working across 14 train operating companies will walk out on July 20, 22, and 29. RMT general secretary Mick Lynch emphasized that the strike mandate was renewed by an overwhelming majority, and the union will continue its campaign until a satisfactory agreement is reached on pay, working conditions, and job security.
The latest pay offer from the Rail Delivery Group, representing the bosses, is a mere 5 percent pay increase for the 2022-23 period, significantly below the inflation rate. Additionally, the union would have to accept company-by-company negotiations for a major restructuring of job roles and conditions before a pay rise for 2023-24 is considered. The fragmented talks and proposed changes by the rail companies, such as a single flexible station grade and closed ticket offices, have sparked concerns among union leaders. Despite some leaders possibly viewing the 5 percent offer as acceptable without the conditions attached, it is regarded as inadequate and should be rejected.
While the new strikes are welcomed, it is evident that achieving victory will require a higher level of action. The upcoming anti-union laws that the Tories plan to pass in parliament pose a threat, allowing for minimum service levels during strikes and potential repercussions for non-compliance. Rail workers will likely be among the early targets. In the negotiations, unions should demand a firm commitment from employers to refrain from utilizing these laws under any circumstances. The Scottish government has already agreed to this condition, raising the question of why rail bosses have not followed suit. Any employer resorting to these laws must be met with mass defiance and non-compliance.
In a separate development, RMT members working as ticket inspectors on Arriva Rail London (London Overground) have commenced voting on whether to strike. The vote stems from a collective grievance that has not been adequately addressed, with the employer failing to adhere to the proper procedures outlined in the collective bargaining agreement. The ballot will run until July 11.
Xplore Dundee bus workers resume strike action over rejected pay offer
Bus workers employed by Xplore Dundee went back on strike this weekend after rejecting the latest pay proposal. Members of Unite, the union representing the workers, had previously walked out in a heated dispute concerning pay, terms, and conditions at the city’s privately-owned bus operator, which is part of the McGills group. The workers were dissatisfied with a below-inflation pay increase of 7 percent, ongoing restrictions on sick pay, and the accumulation of hundreds of days in outstanding annual leave owed by the company.
The employer, known for its anti-trade union stance, further provoked workers by displaying pictures of the city’s shuttered Timex factory on noticeboards during the strike ballot. This was seen as a veiled threat, which became explicit during negotiations when the company hinted at folding the business and terminating employees to be rehired. The workers had temporarily suspended their 12-week strike to consider a new offer, but according to Unite representative Dougie Maguire, the proposed terms failed to meet their needs, particularly amidst the current cost-of-living crisis.
Maguire emphasized that for a resolution to the dispute, Xplore Dundee must present an offer that aligns with the expectations and demands of the workers.
Amazon workers in Coventry set to strike for three days during Prime week, warns GMB
The GMB union issued a warning today that the upcoming three-day pay strikes at Amazon’s Coventry warehouse will have a significant impact on one of the online retail giant’s busiest weeks of the year. The walkouts, scheduled for July 11, 12, and 13, coincide with the company’s annual Prime week event, known for offering substantial discounts on popular products to drive sales.
Nearly 900 workers in the West Midlands are expected to participate in the ongoing dispute, marking the first time that British-based Amazon staff have taken strike action. The conflict, initiated in January following a meagre 50p hourly wage increase, has already resulted in 19 days of strikes.
Rachel Fagan, senior organiser at GMB, emphasized the staggering sales figures generated during Prime week, which can reach up to £2 billion. In light of this, she criticized the company for denying low-paid workers a wage that enables them to meet their financial needs. The message from GMB members to Amazon is clear: human beings cannot be undervalued and underpaid.
North-West University Support Staff Escalate Strikes Demanding Fair Pay
Support staff at universities in north-west England are intensifying their strike action in protest of their pay. Employees such as cleaners, IT technicians, administrators, and library staff at Manchester Metropolitan University will walk out today and tomorrow, adding to the six days of strikes that began last week. They will also strike on July 5, 6, and 7. Additionally, support staff at the University of Liverpool and Liverpool Hope University took action on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday.
These workers, who are members of the public-sector union Unison, are demanding fairer compensation for their vital roles in ensuring a positive university experience for students. Unison’s North West regional organiser, Kate Doyle, criticized the generous executive pay and bonuses enjoyed by senior leaders in higher education while support staff have faced years of pay cuts in real terms. Doyle called on the universities to reconsider their inadequate pay offer and improve wages. The workers have already rejected a 5 to 8 percent pay rise.
and finally, Sun Editorial shows need for a pro-union Counter Media
The need for a pro-worker counter media arises from several reasons that stem from the shortcomings and biases present in mainstream media. This is especially evident in the editorial you mentioned from The Sun newspaper, which highlights the importance of alternative sources of information that prioritize the interests and well-being of workers. Here are some key reasons why a pro-worker counter media is necessary:
Challenging biased narratives: Mainstream media outlets often have corporate interests or political affiliations that can lead to biased reporting. As a result, they may prioritize the perspectives and agendas of the elite or powerful, neglecting the concerns and struggles of the working class. A pro-worker counter media aims to challenge these biased narratives and provide a platform for alternative viewpoints.
Amplifying worker voices: Workers’ perspectives and experiences are crucial in understanding socio-economic issues, labor rights, and workplace conditions. However, these voices are often marginalized or overshadowed in mainstream media. Pro-worker media outlets prioritize amplifying the voices of workers, allowing them to share their stories, concerns, and demands, thereby fostering a more inclusive and democratic media landscape.
Raising awareness of labor rights: Many workers face challenges such as exploitation, unfair wages, unsafe working conditions, and inadequate labour protections. Mainstream media may not adequately cover these issues or provide in-depth analysis of labour rights violations. A pro-worker counter media strives to educate the public about labour rights, workplace abuses, and the need for social and economic justice.
Holding power to account: Media plays a crucial role in holding power accountable, including government institutions, corporations, and other influential entities. However, when media outlets have vested interests tied to these powerful entities, their ability to provide objective scrutiny may be compromised. Pro-worker media outlets are less likely to be influenced by these interests, allowing them to provide a more independent and critical perspective on power dynamics and abuses.
Fostering solidarity and organizing efforts: Pro-worker counter media can serve as a platform for fostering solidarity among workers, unions, and labour movements. By highlighting success stories, organizing efforts, and collective actions, these media outlets can inspire and mobilize workers, contributing to a stronger labour movement and improved working conditions.
Examples like the Morning Star, Workers magazine, and the Union News podcast that you mentioned are important alternatives that prioritize the interests of workers and provide a counter-narrative to the dominant mainstream media. Supporting such outlets can help create a more balanced media landscape, ensure the representation of workers’ concerns, and contribute to a fairer society.
If you’ve enjoyed this edition of Union News please consider sharing, liking and subscribing.
A recent investigation by the GMB union has unveiled shocking revelations about the extent of violence faced by workers in various sectors across the UK.
From underpaid ambulance crews to retail workers, fire brigade crews, pharmacists, and prison officers, a distressing number of individuals have fallen victim to violent attacks while carrying out their duties. It is high time we address the underlying issues contributing to this violence and take immediate action to protect the well-being of our workers.
Uncovering the Statistics
According to the GMB union’s investigation, a staggering number of violent attacks have been reported against workers in recent years. The findings revealed that between 2017-18 and 2021-22, at least 9,565 incidents of violence occurred across Britain and Northern Ireland. It is important to note that these figures may be significantly higher, as only eight out of the 13 ambulance trusts provided data. The Midlands region has been particularly affected, with 4,318 assaults recorded. Additionally, during the same period, 1,248 cases of sexual assault were documented.
The Toll on Workers
These acts of violence take a significant toll on the affected workers. Patrick Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union, expressed his concerns: “Violence against workers, irrespective of their sector, is utterly deplorable. Whether it’s retail workers, fire brigade crews, pharmacists, or prison officers, no one should have to endure such acts of violence while trying to carry out their job duties.”
The impact of these assaults is not limited to physical harm but also includes psychological and emotional trauma that can affect individuals and their families for years to come.
The Importance of Legislation
Recognizing the urgent need to address this issue, the Assaults Against Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 was introduced, making common assault against emergency staff a specific offense. The legislation also mandates that courts consider such attacks as an aggravating factor during sentencing. However, it is important to note that sexual assaults were initially not covered by the law. Thanks to the persistent efforts of the GMB and its members, the government amended the legislation after a significant increase in reported incidents from 2012 to 2017.
The Way Forward
While progress has been made, it is crucial to acknowledge that more needs to be done to protect workers across all sectors. Violence should never be tolerated. Patrick Harrington further emphasizes, “We must condemn violence against workers in all sectors, whether it’s the retail industry, fire brigade crews, pharmacists, or prison officers. Every worker deserves a safe and secure working environment. The government, employers, and society as a whole must join forces to ensure the safety, well-being, and dignity of all workers.”
Conclusion
Violence against workers is an alarming and reprehensible issue that must be addressed urgently. The GMB investigation serves as a wake-up call to tackle the root causes of this violence and protect workers in all sectors. Our retail workers, fire brigade crews, pharmacists, prison officers, and countless others who serve the public deserve our unwavering support. Let us stand united against violence and create a culture that respects the rights and safety of all workers. It is only through collective effort and decisive action that we can put an end to violence against those who contribute so much to our society.
Our graphic highlights a number of upcoming strikes by fellow British workers who are fighting for fair pay and working conditions. It is becoming increasingly clear that people cannot manage on below inflation “pay rises” that are, in reality, pay cuts. Unfortunately, this year, many workers are facing not just one but multiple years of real-terms wage cuts.
People are understandably fed up and are taking action to fight back against these unfair policies. At Solidarity, we firmly believe that it is important to support and stand with our brothers and sisters in other unions when they take action. This is why we are explaining the reasons behind these strikes and urging you to join the picket lines if possible.
It is true that times are tough, but we encourage you to consider making a small donation to the strike funds if you can. Every little bit helps and can make a big difference in supporting those who are fighting for fair pay and better working conditions.
The strikes are not just about money, they are also about dignity and respect for workers. Many of the workers who will be striking are in essential services such as healthcare, transportation, and education. They are on the front lines every day, providing vital services to our communities, and deserve to be treated with fairness and respect.
We urge you to show your support for these workers and stand in solidarity with them as they fight for their rights. By doing so, we can send a message to employers and the government that we will not stand idly by while workers are treated unfairly. Together, we can make a difference and create a better future for all workers.
Why are the junior doctors in the British Medical Association striking?
The strikes are mainly over pay. The BMA said the wage for junior doctors has fallen 26% in the last 15 years, with newly qualified medics making less than a barista in a coffee shop.
It has demanded a 35% pay rise for junior doctors to bring salaries back to 2008-2009 levels, calling this “pay restoration”.
“The lack of investment in wages by the government has made it harder to recruit and retain junior doctors,” the BMA said.
“If junior doctors are forced out of the NHS because of poor pay and conditions, the services we all rely on to look after our loved ones will suffer.”
Why are teachers in the National Education Union striking?
Experienced teachers’ pay has fallen by one fifth in real terms since 2010, and that the current cost-of-living crisis in Britain is exacerbating the problem. It is also troubling to hear that the government is suggesting only a five per cent increase in pay for experienced teachers, which is effectively a seven per cent cut when inflation is factored in.
It is not surprising that long hours and poor pay are causing many teachers to leave the profession, leading to a recruitment and retention crisis in education. This situation ultimately harms children’s education, as there are not enough teachers to provide high-quality instruction. Furthermore, when supply teachers or unqualified teachers are used, it can negatively impact students’ learning outcomes.
It is important for the government to take action to address this issue and prioritize the recruitment and retention of qualified teachers. This includes providing fair and competitive pay, reducing workload, and ensuring that teachers are supported and valued for the important work they do. It is crucial for the future of education in Britain that we invest in our teachers and provide them with the resources and support they need to succeed.
What can I do to help the workers?
You can join striking staff on the picket lines.
Why are civil and public servants in the PCS striking?
Their industrial action is in support of our claim for a 10% pay rise, pensions justice, job security and no cuts to redundancy terms. The PCS been carrying out targeted industrial action with specific groups of members, designed to cause the most disruption to the employer.
Why are Amazon workers in the GMB at the Coventry Warehouse striking?
Workers at Amazon’s Coventry warehouse have announced six fresh strike dates, as the GMB union prepares to test support for stoppages among staff at another five of the delivery company’s sites.
Strikes at the vast Coventry centre, known as BHX4, began in January – the first industrial action ever taken against Amazon in the UK. Staff are demanding pay of £15 an hour.
The GMB claims to have signed up hundreds of new members among the workforce at Coventry and in Amazon sites further afield since the dispute began.
Amazon announced a fresh pay rise for all its UK staff earlier this month but the union said this amounted to an average of only 1.8%-2.5%, describing it as “an insult”.
More than 560 workers are now expected to join in two three-day stoppages, one from 16-18 April and another from 21-23 April. Previously fewer than 300 staff were involved. The union believes it is edging closer to the 50% membership that would allow it to apply for statutory recognition.
