Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated
1,156 words, 6 minutes read time.
Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg. This week: ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action, Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute, Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul, and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy.
ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action
Rail passengers across the United Kingdom are facing significant disruptions due to strike action as a consequence of the failure of rail companies and government to resolve a two-year-long dispute over pay and working conditions. Train drivers affiliated with the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) are striking. The strikes have already begun and will continue on Wednesday and Thursday. Drivers are also banning overtime until Saturday, exacerbating the situation.
Southeastern, Southern, Thameslink, and Gatwick Express routes are the services affected.
The dispute centers around pay. ASLEF members have not received a pay rise in five years, leading to frustration and industrial action. formal talks between the operators and the union have not occurred for a year, making this the longest-ever rail industry dispute.
As action continues, commuters are left grappling with disrupted travel plans, and the pressure mounts on the government and rail companies involved to seek a resolution with ASLEF. Stay tuned for further updates as the situation unfolds.
Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute
In a bold move, more than 1,000 security guards employed by G4S at Jobcentres across the country are set to walk out in a 24-hour strike starting tonight. The dispute centres around pay, with guards demanding fair compensation for their crucial role.
The GMB union, representing these guards, revealed that a recent survey found alarming rates of abuse suffered by its members. Shockingly, four out of five guards reported incidents of physical violence, including dog attacks and assaults by members of the public.
But it’s not just physical harm they face. Guards also endure daily verbal abuse, ranging from threats against their families to racist slurs and even death threats.
The strike action is scheduled for multiple dates, including May 13, 20, 28, and 29. GMB national officer Eamon O’Hearn emphasized the immense pressure these guards operate under, stating, “G4S and the Department for Work and Pensions are content to let guards scrape by on minimum wage. These survey results underscore the urgent need for change.”
This marks the first time that guards have united to demand better conditions. A spokesperson for G4S expressed disappointment at the decision and stated that the company is still attempting to reach an amicable agreement.
Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul
In a move that has sparked heated debate, the UK government has unveiled proposals to overhaul the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. While the government aims to address rising costs and streamline support, unions and disabled rights campaigners have raised serious objections.
Here’s what critics are saying about the proposed changes:
Charities and advocacy groups have labelled the government’s plans as “dangerous” and “reckless.” They argue that restricting access to PIP and replacing regular cash payments with other forms of provision could have devastating consequences for disabled individuals.
Concerns centre around the potential impact on vulnerable claimants who rely on consistent financial support. One-off grants may not adequately meet ongoing needs, leading to increased hardship.
The government’s emphasis on mental health conditions in the proposed reforms has drawn criticism. While it acknowledges the rise in PIP claims related to mental health, campaigners worry that the changes may inadvertently harm those with invisible disabilities3.
Critics argue that lump-sum grants may not address the ongoing challenges faced by individuals with fluctuating conditions. Regular cash payments provide stability, whereas one-off grants may fall short.
Disabled rights campaigners emphasize the need for a fair and compassionate welfare system. While the government aims to target support more accurately, critics fear that vulnerable claimants could slip through the cracks.
Removing the PIP assessment altogether for certain health conditions or disabilities may simplify bureaucracy, but it must not compromise essential assistance for those most in need.
As consultations begin, the government faces mounting pressure to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and safeguarding the well-being of disabled individuals. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of disability benefits in the UK.
and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy
In a dramatic turn of events, several unions have issued stern warnings to the Labour Party, urging them not to dilute their proposed New Deal for Working People. Recent reports in the Financial Times suggest that the party may be reconsidering some of its earlier commitments, leading to concerns among labour advocates.
Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, minced no words: “Choosing May Day to signal a retreat from overhauling one of Europe’s worst employment rights frameworks is beyond ironic. If Labour fails to explicitly reaffirm their promise that the New Deal for Workers will be fully implemented within the first 100 days of office, they will cross a red line.”
The GMB union echoes the sentiment: “Working people are desperate for change, and we expect Labour to honour its pledges. The New Deal for Working People was agreed upon at the party’s national policy forum last summer, and Keir Starmer’s commitment to it remains crucial.”
The heart of the controversy lies in Labour’s stance on zero-hours contracts, affecting approximately 1.1 million workers in the UK. The original New Deal vowed to ban such contracts entirely, ensuring a minimum number of guaranteed hours for all. However, recent media commentary suggests a shift: Labour may not outright ban zero-hours contracts but will emphasize employers’ duty to provide contracts based on the preceding 12 weeks’ work.
A Labour spokesperson maintains that the New Deal remains a core part of their platform: “We will campaign vigorously on this ahead of the general election. Our commitment to delivering legislation within 100 days and consulting widely on implementation remains unchanged.”
The party’s revised plans align with decisions made at the national policy forum. These include creating a “single status” for all workers (except genuinely self-employed individuals) and reviewing parental leave within the first year of a Labour administration.
Trade union leaders are unyielding in their stance: “Any dilution of the New Deal for workers is wholly unacceptable. Labour must stand firm against corporate greed and prioritize the interests of working people. Attempts to water down this popular policy will face a robust response from the entire trade union movement.” – Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary
“Working people deserve protection from business excesses, not concessions to the super-rich. We won’t accept any weakening of workers’ rights.” – Fran Heathcote, PCS General Secretary
As the debate intensifies, the fate of the New Deal hangs in the balance, with both political and practical implications for millions of workers across the country.
