Big Business Wants to Block Your Rights at Work – We Can’t Let Them

In an open letter, organisations such as the Confederation of British Industry and British Chambers of Commerce voiced their concerns. Others joined them in warning that the legislation would hurt growth. They also cautioned it would encourage conflict. Their concerns? That providing workers with proper rights, like fair notice, is problematic. Offering guaranteed hours can be challenging. Protecting workers from unfair dismissal might somehow damage the economy.

Let’s not be fooled.

The Employment Rights Bill includes modest but much-needed reforms. It would clamp down on exploitative zero-hours contracts. It would extend sick pay to all. It would scrap the draconian Minimum Service Levels Act, which restricts workers’ ability to take lawful strike action. And it would make sure employees can’t be dismissed unfairly from the moment they start a job.

These aren’t radical demands. They’re basic standards in any society that values dignity and decency in the workplace.

Yet big business leaders claim these measures are too costly or burdensome. That offering stable hours to people who work regular shifts is ‘unnecessary admin’. That allowing staff to challenge unfair treatment will put employers off hiring. The same tired arguments were wheeled out decades ago when the minimum wage was introduced. They were wrong then, and they’re no more convincing now.

The truth is, good employers already treat their staff fairly. They value loyalty, stability, and wellbeing. It’s not fairness that threatens economic performance – it’s insecurity, low morale, and poor conditions. Reforms like these don’t stifle growth; they make it more sustainable.

Let’s also remember: these proposed changes are popular. Surveys show that managers and workers alike support stronger protections. They recognise that rights at work aren’t just about fairness – they’re essential for productivity, health, and trust.

The Bill itself is already a scaled-back version of what was promised in Labour’s original New Deal for Working People. Unfortunately, it falls short. That plan included meaningful sector-wide bargaining, proper enforcement, and an end to fire-and-rehire tactics. It aligned the UK with international labour standards. That’s the real vision we should be aiming for.

Further dilution of the current proposals would serve only one purpose. It would keep the door open for rogue employers to exploit vulnerable workers. To keep wages low, rights weak, and unions sidelined.

We need to stop pretending that the voices of corporate lobbyists are neutral or balanced. They represent those with the most to lose from fairer treatment of the people who keep this country running. These include the cleaners, carers, drivers, hospitality staff, engineers, and countless others.

Solidarity stands firmly behind the Employment Rights Bill. We call on the government to strengthen it, not strip it back. And we urge Parliament to stand with working people – not those clinging to a broken status quo.

Working people have waited long enough. Now is the time to deliver.

Upholding Workers’ Rights: Unions Vigilant as CBI Attempts to Influence Labour’s ‘New Deal’

411 words, 2 minutes read time.

In a critical moment for workers’ rights, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), led by its new president Rupert Soames, is exerting pressure on the Labour Party to reconsider its groundbreaking “New Deal for Working People.” Soames, expressing concerns about an allegedly restrictive “European model” and the potential unintended consequences of robust employment reforms, has called for a watering down of the Labour Party’s ambitious proposals.

The Labour Party’s comprehensive policy, unveiled in the “New Deal for Working People,” outlines substantial measures aimed at fortifying individual and collective rights. Among these are immediate eligibility for essential rights for all workers, a ban on exploitative zero-hours contracts, an end to misleading self-employment practices, and an overdue modernization of trade union legislation to empower workers collectively. The policy also tackles issues such as fair pay agreements, safety and autonomy at work, and the establishment of a robust social security safety net.

Yet, in the midst of these progressive proposals, the CBI insists on maintaining a flexible labor market while addressing workers’ rights. This stance raises alarms among those who fear a potential dilution of the Labour Party’s commitment to robust worker protections.

Adding historical context, critics highlight Labour’s past challenges in upholding workers’ rights. The influence of corporate interests on Tony Blair’s policies, including compromises on union legislation, transposition of European laws, and safeguards for agency and temporary workers, serves as a cautionary tale.

Amidst these concerns, unions are taking a proactive stance to ensure that the Labour Party remains true to its commitments. A historical lack of vigilance has shown the potential for outside influences to compromise workers’ rights within the Labour Party. Unions are rallying to keep a close watch on Labour, emphasizing the need for unwavering dedication to the “New Deal for Working People” and resisting any attempts to weaken vital protections for the workforce.

As the dialogue between the CBI and the Labour Party unfolds, unions are on high alert, stressing the importance of an approach that safeguards the interests of workers. The call to action is clear: unions must remain vigilant to secure the promises made in the “New Deal for Working People” and protect the hard-fought rights of workers. In this critical juncture, the commitment to a fair and just workplace depends on the collective vigilance of union, ensuring that the Labour Party stays true to its pro-worker commitments.

By Pat Harrington

This article was first published in British Worker, the weekly member’s bulletin of Solidarity union.