Solidarity with British Industry: Why Buying British Is More Vital Than Ever by Pat Harrington

All political groups and unions must unite in a ‘Buy British campaign says Pat Harrington

1,235 words, 7 minutes read time.

The call to “Buy British” has never been a matter of nostalgia or jingoism. For trade unions like Solidarity and the wider Labour movement, it’s a practical, progressive tool to protect jobs, revive our manufacturing base, and build a more self-reliant, future-ready economy. Amid the upheavals of global supply chains, mounting geopolitical tensions, and the rise of protectionist policies from international powers like the United States, the case for using our collective spending power to support British industry has never been stronger.

Solidarity union has proudly led the charge, running several public campaigns urging consumers to choose British-made goods wherever possible. These campaigns are rooted in a simple yet powerful belief: when we buy British, we invest in British jobs, communities, and skills. It’s not just about waving the flag—it’s about economic justice, sustainability, and national resilience.

Historically, the Labour Party and trade unions have often championed “Buy British” initiatives during times of industrial crisis. In the 1970s and 1980s, as traditional industries faced collapse, union campaigns highlighted the importance of keeping jobs in Britain. The Transport & General Workers’ Union, for example, actively promoted British-made vehicles and products to protect domestic manufacturing. Labour governments of the past also embraced this approach. Harold Wilson praised grassroots initiatives such as the “I’m Backing Britain” campaign in the late 1960s, and the Labour manifesto of 1983 proposed import controls and prioritising British-made goods in public procurement. While these efforts were sometimes controversial, they were rooted in a shared commitment to national industrial renewal.

In more recent years, trade union federations like the TUC have published position papers advocating for a coherent industrial strategy. These documents emphasise the need for investment in high-value manufacturing, green energy, and infrastructure—areas where government procurement can and should favour domestic suppliers. Solidarity fully supports these calls and continues to argue that only with a long-term industrial plan can Britain secure its economic independence.

That said, not all political leaders have shown the same resolve. Some voices within the Labour Party have expressed hesitation. For instance, Chancellor Rachel Reeves recently stated that she would not back a consumer-focused “Buy British” campaign, arguing that such efforts risk encouraging economic nationalism. While Solidarity recognises the dangers of xenophobia or trade isolationism, we firmly disagree with this conclusion. We believe the British public should be encouraged and empowered to support local production—not out of hostility to others, but out of loyalty to the communities in which they live and work.

It is important to state clearly: Solidarity does not base its policy on a shallow anti-Americanism or target U.S. imports specifically. Our position is motivated by a sincere desire to see an independent and prosperous United Kingdom—capable of making and trading high-quality goods, resilient in the face of global shocks, and free to pursue its own economic strategy. Buying British, in our view, is not about closing ourselves off from the world; it’s about building a strong, confident nation that can compete globally from a position of strength.

This aspiration is only possible because of the freedoms we now possess outside the European Union. Many of the measures we advocate—strategic procurement, public investment in domestic industry, and local content rules—would have been difficult, if not impossible, under EU single market and state aid rules. Whatever one’s position on Brexit, it is clear that the UK is now uniquely positioned to chart its own industrial future. That opportunity must not be wasted.

We’ve seen firsthand how offshoring and deindustrialisation have hollowed out communities. Entire generations have been robbed of the skilled, secure work that once defined working-class life in Britain. Yet, instead of despair, we see opportunity: the chance to rebuild. Rebuilding the UK’s manufacturing base is not a backward-looking project. On the contrary, it’s the only credible path to long-term prosperity, especially in a world where supply lines can snap overnight and foreign governments act unilaterally to prioritise their own industries.

Take the example of the U.S. tariffs under the Trump administration—first on steel and aluminium, then on aircraft, and now the new blanket 10% tariffs and targeted car tariffs. These are not just abstract trade disputes; they’re direct threats to British workers. When tariffs shut out our exports, our factories suffer, our jobs disappear, and our communities pay the price. The only responsible response is to fight back—not with hollow slogans, but with investment, procurement, and a serious industrial strategy.

That’s why Solidarity supports the Labour Party’s calls for strategic procurement to favour UK suppliers. Labour’s proposals to rebuild manufacturing capacity, invest in green industry, and embed “Buy British” principles in public contracts are not just welcome—they are essential. The promise to make, buy, and sell more in Britain isn’t protectionism—it’s common sense. It’s about using the enormous power of public spending—over £270 billion a year—to secure good jobs, shorten supply chains, and reduce reliance on volatile global markets.

Technology sovereignty is also at stake. The UK cannot afford to be dependent on others for semiconductors, energy components, or the tools of the future economy. If we want to lead in clean energy, digital infrastructure, or medical innovation, we need to make sure we can build the necessary parts here at home. Buying British isn’t just about steel and cars—it’s about making sure the next generation of industry is made in Britain, by British workers, under decent conditions.

Solidarity’s message is clear: every purchase is a political act. When we buy a car made in Sunderland, a steel beam forged in Port Talbot, or a jacket sewn in Leicester, we’re casting a vote for good jobs, fair pay, and national self-respect. That’s why we continue to campaign not only for better trade policy, but for better choices at the till.

We urge the government—and all political parties—to take up this cause without hesitation. We must match rhetoric with resources, and slogans with strategy. Britain needs a serious industrial policy, clear local content rules in procurement, and investment in the industries of the future. The Labour Party and trade unions are right to demand these things. Solidarity is proud to stand alongside them.

Buying British is not a luxury—it is a necessity. Let’s make it a national priority.


Footnotes

  1. Trump administration imposed 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminium in 2018, affecting UK exports.
  2. UK exports of cars to the US exceed £8 billion annually; Trump threatened a 25% tariff on autos in 2019 and 2025.
  3. Labour’s 2024 industrial strategy includes proposals for strategic procurement and rebuilding domestic supply chains.
  4. Solidarity union campaigns have included local business spotlights, workplace posters, and social media campaigns to encourage consumers to buy British.
  5. The TUC has long advocated for the revival of UK manufacturing and coordinated responses to trade shocks.
  6. Labour and unions called for “Save Our Steel” procurement policies during the 2015-2016 crisis and after Trump-era tariffs.
  7. The UK’s public procurement budget is approximately £270 billion per year, presenting a major opportunity to boost domestic industry.
  8. Technology sovereignty has been cited by think tanks and unions as a key pillar of future industrial resilience.
  9. The 1983 Labour manifesto proposed import controls and prioritisation of British-made goods.
  10. Rachel Reeves, April 2025: “If every country decided to only buy things produced at home, that’s not a good way forward.”

Reform and Tories vote against workers’ rights

328 words, 2 minutes read time.

In a significant move for workers’ rights, the Employment Rights Bill has successfully passed its second reading in the Commons, despite facing opposition from Tory and Reform MPs. This landmark bill, which enjoys widespread support from the electorate, including those who traditionally vote for right-wing parties, promises to usher in a new era of protections for workers.

The TUC has expressed its disappointment in the Tory and Reform parties stance, stating that their vote against the bill reveals a disregard for the welfare of working people. The bill’s provisions, which include immediate protection against unfair dismissal, entitlement to sick pay, and restrictions on zero-hours contracts and the controversial ‘fire and rehire’ practices, are seen as essential steps in safeguarding workers’ rights.

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak commented on the passage of the bill, highlighting the contrast between the bill’s intentions and the actions of the Conservatives and Reform. “At a time when so many are suffering in precarious and low-paid jobs, it’s disheartening to see these parties oppose measures that would improve the lives of millions,” he said.

Pat Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union commented, “Tories voting against the Bill was to be expected. The Reform MPs voting against shows that despite their spin that they are the champions of ordinary people they are not. They use Populist slogans but when you see how they vote it’s clear that they are no friends of the people.”

Labour MP Ian Lavery praised the bill as a pivotal move towards rectifying the injustices faced by the working class, a sentiment echoed by many of his colleagues. However, the debate also brought to light concerns over the bill’s silence on insourcing, with left MP John McDonnell cautioning that this omission could lead to industrial action within government departments.

The passage of the Employment Rights Bill marks a hopeful turning point for employment rights in the UK, signalling a commitment to creating a fairer and more secure working environment for all.

By Maria Camara

Labours’ Employment King’s Speech: Transformative Proposals for Workers’ Rights and Fairness

957 words, 5 minutes read time.

In the King’s Speech Labour has laid out a legislative agenda that promises to reshape the landscape of workers’ rights and public ownership in Britain. The speech, while brief in its mention of specific policies, has set the stage for significant reforms aimed at banning exploitative practices and enhancing employment rights. This ambitious agenda has sparked enthusiasm among pro-worker and pro-union advocates, who see it as a long-overdue move towards a fairer and more equitable society.

Transformative Proposals in the Employment Rights Bill

The cornerstone of Labour’s new agenda is the Employment Rights Bill, which promises sweeping changes to improve the lives of workers across the country. The bill includes several key provisions:

  1. Parental Leave, Sick Pay, and Protection from Unfair Dismissal: Making these benefits available from day one is a crucial step in ensuring that all workers, regardless of their employment duration, have access to basic rights. This move is particularly significant for those in precarious jobs, offering them much-needed security.
  2. Banning Zero-Hour Contracts: Zero-hour contracts have long been criticized for their exploitative nature, providing workers with little job security and unpredictable income. By banning these contracts, Labour is addressing a major issue that has left many workers in a state of constant uncertainty.
  3. Ending ‘Fire and Rehire’ Practices: The practice of firing employees only to rehire them on less favourable terms has been a contentious issue. Reforming the law to end this exploitative practice will protect workers from being manipulated and ensure fair treatment.
  4. Removing the Lower Earnings Limit for Statutory Sick Pay: This change ensures that all workers, regardless of their income level, have access to sick pay. It is a vital reform, especially for low-income workers who are often most vulnerable to financial hardship when ill.
  5. Making Flexible Working the Default: By making flexible working the default from day one, Labour is recognizing the importance of work-life balance and the diverse needs of the modern workforce. This policy is expected to particularly benefit working parents and those with caring responsibilities.
  6. Protection for Women Post-Maternity Leave: Making it unlawful to dismiss a woman within six months of returning from maternity leave is a progressive step towards gender equality in the workplace. It ensures that women are not penalized for starting families.
  7. Creation of the Fair Work Agency: This new agency will play a crucial role in enforcing workplace rights, ensuring that the new laws are implemented effectively and that workers can seek redress when their rights are violated.
  8. Fair Pay Agreement in Adult Social Care: The introduction of a Fair Pay Agreement in the adult social care sector addresses the chronic underpayment and undervaluation of care workers, a predominantly female and minority workforce.
  9. Simplifying Union Recognition: Making it easier for trade unions to gain statutory recognition empowers workers to collectively bargain for better terms and conditions, a fundamental right in any democratic society.
  10. Repealing Minimum Service Levels for Industrial Action: This repeal restores the right to strike, which is essential for workers to negotiate fair wages and conditions without the fear of legal repercussions.

Paul Nowak, General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), hailed the Employment Rights Bill as a vital step towards “repairing and rebuilding Britain after 14 years of chaos and decline.” He emphasized that boosting workers’ rights and ensuring security and respect at work are pivotal for a fair economy. This sentiment is echoed by Christina McAnea, General Secretary of Unison, who described the workplace rights package as a “game changer,” particularly praising the focus on social care.

Public Ownership and Infrastructure Reforms

In addition to the Employment Rights Bill, Labour’s agenda includes significant measures aimed at reversing the privatization of essential services. Key among these is the renationalization of railways and the establishment of Great British Energy, a publicly owned clean energy production company.

Mick Whelan, General Secretary of Aslef, the train drivers’ union, praised the decision to renationalize the railways as “the right decision, at the right time,” emphasizing its potential to stimulate economic growth and rebuild Britain’s infrastructure. Similarly, the creation of Great British Energy is seen as a pivotal move towards a sustainable future, capable of driving the green transition while creating jobs and boosting the economy.

The Better Buses Bill, which grants communities the power to take back control of bus services, also received strong support. Public ownership of bus services, as demonstrated by successful municipally owned companies like Reading Buses, can significantly improve local transport and contribute to economic vitality.

Missed Opportunities and Future Campaigns

Despite the many positive proposals, there are areas where Labour’s agenda falls short. The absence of plans to bring water companies into public ownership, reinstate the NHS as a fully public service, and buy back British Gas are notable omissions that have disappointed some advocates. These missed opportunities highlight the need for continued campaigning to push Labour towards a more comprehensive public ownership model.

Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, warned against the constraints of a “financial straitjacket,” arguing that substantial investment is necessary to tackle the current crises in public services and infrastructure. She stressed that reliance on growth alone might not be sufficient to deliver the urgent changes needed.

Our GenSec’s View

Patrick Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union commented: “Labour’s legislative agenda, as outlined in the King’s Speech, marks a significant shift towards enhancing workers’ rights and reversing decades of privatization. While the proposals have been broadly welcomed by unions and pro-worker advocates, the journey towards a truly fair and equitable society requires ongoing vigilance and activism. As the details of the draft legislation emerge, I t will be crucial for unions and workers to continue to advocate for comprehensive reforms that ensure dignity, fairness, and security for all workers.”

Image by Mariusz Matuszewski from Pixabay