Category: Union News

Union News 26th of May 2024

Advertisements
Subscribe to Union News on YouTube

1,838 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s episode: Byron Court Primary School Faces Privatisation Battle Amid Harris Federation Controversy, Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers, Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes, Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal, Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer, and finally Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election.

Byron Court Primary School Faces Privatisation Battle Amid Harris Federation Controversy

Byron Court Primary School in North London is at the centre of a heated battle over privatisation plans. The community school, located in Brent, north London, is set to join the notorious Harris Federation academy chain, a move that has sparked outrage among teachers, parents, and local residents.

The controversy began after Ofsted inspectors downgraded Byron Court from an “outstanding” rating to “inadequate” last November. The inspection report highlighted issues of bullying, racist language, and sexual harassment within the school. Parents lost confidence in the institution, and head teacher Martyn Boxall resigned in response to the damning findings.

Acting head Richard Sternberg, who was leading the school during the inspection, assured parents that efforts were underway to address the school’s challenges. However, the Department for Education (DfE) issued an academy order, mandating that Byron Court become part of the Harris Federation—a multi-academy trust known for its involvement in improving educational standards across London and Essex.

The Harris Federation operates 54 primary and secondary schools, directly funded by the DfE and independent of local authority control. Despite the controversy, the federation aims to transform Byron Court through its expertise and resources.

Teachers at Byron Court have taken a stand against the privatisation move. Members of the National Education Union (NEU) went on strike, with further strikes planned for June 4 to 6. NEU national executive member Jenny Cooper emphasized that the union would not accept the politicized privatisation of schools.

A veteran teacher in Brent expressed concerns about the Ofsted inspection process. According to her, the inspectors were rude, altered the inspection timetable, and denied staff necessary support. The inspection outcome, she argued, unfairly smeared the school staff and served as a tool for academisation.

The attempted academisation, however, has faced resistance. The strikes by Byron Court staff have disrupted the Harris Federation’s plans. The teacher hopes that the collective effort will deter the federation from proceeding.

A joint statement from Brent NEU and the Save Byron Court Parent Campaign revealed that nearly two-thirds of parents want the school to remain a community institution. Staff members share this sentiment, yet they find themselves excluded from discussions about the school’s future. The question remains: How can decisions affecting the staff, families, and local community be made without their input

Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers

Retail sales in the UK took a nosedive last month, leaving shop owners and economists concerned. The culprit? A combination of relentless rain and mounting cost-of-living pressures.

Across all sectors, sales plummeted by 2.3 per cent. But certain categories felt the brunt of the storm: clothing, sports equipment, furniture, and games and toys. These segments were particularly affected by the inclement weather during April.

Clothing and household stores bore the brunt of the decline, experiencing a sharp 4.1 per cent drop—the most significant fall since January 2021. Meanwhile, fashion and footwear retailers alone saw sales dip by 5.1 per cent month on month.

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak emphasized the importance of local spending to stimulate growth and support businesses. He stated, “A sustainable recovery hinges on people’s ability to spend in their local economies.”

However, the retail slump underscores ongoing challenges for families grappling with the cost-of-living crisis. Millions are tightening their belts, and household budgets remain under immense strain.

Despite claims of success from the Conservative government, real wages still lag behind pre-2008 levels. The British public remains skeptical, well aware that bills continue to rise.

An Office for National Statistics survey revealed that 55 per cent of adults reported increased living costs over the past month. Food prices topped the list (cited by 94 per cent), followed by fuel (61 per cent), and energy bills (53 per cent).

Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes

Council workers in Scotland are gearing up for a potential summer strike after unanimously rejecting what they deem a “derisory” pay offer. Unite, the union representing these workers, dismissed the proposal put forth by local government body Cosla.

The contentious 18-month deal would have provided council staff with a 2.2% increase from April this year, followed by an additional 2% hike in October. However, Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, emphasized that their members deserve better and should not settle for less.

Graham McNab, Unite’s industrial officer, echoed this sentiment, stating that the pay offer falls far short of meeting the aspirations of local government workers. Unite also opposes the shift of the pay anniversary date to October, viewing it as a mere delay tactic.

Cosla, on the other hand, maintains that their offer is “strong, fair, and credible.” They argue that severe financial constraints faced by councils necessitate a cautious approach to affordability in the context of a flat-cash local government settlement.

As tensions rise, Unison—the largest local government union in Scotland—has also recommended that staff vote against the pay deal. Meanwhile, GMB Scotland’s local government committee rejected the offer, and their members have already backed strike action in a consultative ballot. A formal ballot for care workers is currently underway

Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) is turning up the heat on Labour, demanding the scrapping of the Tories’ controversial minimum service levels legislation. FBU President Ian Murray made this commitment during his opening address at the union’s annual conference in Blackpool.

Murray, a veteran of such gatherings for over two decades, expressed frustration with the state of fire and rescue services. He cited resolutions and policy statements that consistently highlighted the sector’s decline, fragmentation, and inadequate infrastructure investment.

“We’re fighting year after year for the meagre remains on the Treasury table,” Murray declared. “It’s not even enough to maintain the status quo. We need change, and hopefully, a general election will deliver it.”

The FBU’s focus centres on Labour’s promise to repeal the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act within 100 days if the party secures victory in the upcoming general election. This legislation currently mandates fire and rescue services to operate at 73% capacity during strikes, while control rooms continue normal operations despite industrial action.

Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer

The National Education Union (NEU), NASUWT, NAHT, and ASCL school leaders’ union have joined forces to call for urgent action from Education Secretary Gillian Keegan. In a joint letter, they demand the immediate release of the School Teachers’ Review Body’s (STRB) recommendations and the government’s response.

Their key demand? A “fully-funded, above-inflation pay increase for all teachers and school leaders in September 2024.” Anything less, they argue, would be a dereliction of the government’s duty to safeguard the education service. The unions warn that any continued failure to invest adequately will exact a heavy political toll at the upcoming general election.

The STRB, an independent advisory body, provides recommendations on teachers’ and school leaders’ pay and conditions in England. Last week, the latest STRB Report landed on Keegan’s desk. The unions insist that its findings must be made public without delay.

In a pointed reference to Keegan’s previous commitment to align the STRB process with the school budget cycle, the unions emphasize the urgency of publishing the report. They highlight the critical recruitment and retention challenges faced by the education sector. Delaying the report’s release could exacerbate these problems, leading to more teachers and school leaders considering leaving the profession.

Research from the NFER and the House of Commons Education Committee underscores the severity of the recruitment and retention crisis. Teaching’s competitive position has suffered due to pay cuts worse than those in other professions. Skyrocketing workloads compound the challenges. Evidence supports the case for higher teacher pay increases relative to the wider economy to address teacher supply issues.

Moreover, schools have grappled with resource constraints since 2010, with 70% experiencing real-terms funding reductions due to government cuts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that an additional £3.2 billion is needed to restore school spending power to pre-2010 levels.

The unions urge the government to prioritize education investment. Their first demand: a fully funded, above-inflation pay rise for educators in September 2024. Failure to meet this crucial step would jeopardize the education service’s future.

Parents, teachers, and school leaders await Keegan’s response. The stakes are high—the government’s actions will resonate at the General Election.

and finally, Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election

As the 2024 general election approaches, voters across the United Kingdom are faced with critical decisions. Amidst the familiar political landscape dominated by the old gang parties, a new force is emerging: the Workers Party of Britain. Led by the charismatic George Galloway, this party aims to challenge the status quo and provide a fresh alternative for disillusioned voters.

Why Consider the Workers Party?

The Workers Party’s rallying cry is stalwart support for the Palestinian people and opposition to British complicity in the Gaza genocide1. While this issue remains central, the party also addresses a wide range of concerns, from healthcare (NHS) to the economy, crime, and immigration. The economic policies of the Party are pro-union and pro-worker.

The Workers Party plans to contest almost every English seat in the upcoming election, making it the largest left-of-Labour electoral challenge in history. Their goal is to have the same impact on Labour as Nigel Farage’s Reform Party had on the Tories. With over 500 candidates already in place, they’re poised to shake up the political landscape.

Independent Left Candidates: The Workers Party supports a select group of independent left-leaning candidates. Among them are Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, who will stand as an independent in Islington North, and Andrew Feinstein, chosen by the Organise Corbyn-Inspired Socialist Alliance (OCISA) to unseat Keir Starmer in Holborn and St Pancras. These candidates offer an alternative to the mainstream parties.

As the election draws near, voters must seriously consider their options. The Workers Party, with its principled stance, and independent candidates, offer a compelling alternative. Whether you’re disillusioned with the major parties or seeking a new vision for Britain, the Workers Party and Independent left candidates deserve your attention. Remember, the ballot box is one way to achieve change, and this election presents an opportunity to shape the future of our nation.

Workers Party of Great Britain Logo
By https://workerspartybritain.org/, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=68206749

Union News 21st of May 2024

Advertisements
Subscribe to Union News here

1,518 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News for the 21st of May 2024. In this week’s edition: Labour Leader Faces Union Backlash Over Workers’ Rights Revisions, Historic Win for Workers: Lord Woodley’s Anti-Fire and Rehire Bill Passes Unopposed, Scottish Lecturers Strike for Fair Pay Amidst Cost-of-Living Crisis, and finally, Apprenticeship Levy Backfires, Undermining Training Schemes, Report Warns Government’s Apprenticeship Levy Faces Criticism for Harming Training Programs. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg.

Labour Leader Faces Union Backlash Over Workers’ Rights Revisions
Starmer Scrambles to Mend Ties with Unions Amid Workers’ Rights Tensions

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is working to reassure trade union leaders about his party’s commitment to workers’ rights following accusations of diluting key policies.

Labour’s ambitious plan, heralded as the most significant workers’ rights overhaul in decades, promises to ban zero hours contracts, ensure employment rights from day one, and end “fire and rehire” practices. Initially introduced by Deputy Leader Angela Rayner in 2021, the plan has faced scrutiny and revisions, raising concerns among union leaders.

Union leaders were alarmed by a new document, circulated last week, which they viewed as a retreat from the original commitments. Unite’s General Secretary, Sharon Graham, branded the document a “betrayal” and “unrecognizable” from the initial plan.

In a bid to address these concerns, Starmer, along with Rayner and Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves, met with trade union officials. Following intense discussions, the controversial draft was scrapped.

In a joint statement, Labour and union leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the “new deal for working people,” as agreed last July. They pledged to work swiftly on legislative plans to bring these commitments into action should Labour win the next election.

Despite the recent agreement, tensions remain high. Union sources suggest that Labour’s leadership might be succumbing to pressure from business interests as the election approaches.

After the meeting, Graham expressed cautious optimism, stating that Labour had recommitted to the New Deal for Working People. She emphasized the importance of workers’ voices in the ongoing discussions, noting another meeting is scheduled in three weeks to finalize details.

Labour’s plans originally included introducing an “employment rights bill” within 100 days of taking office, though this timeline is now considered ambitious. Changes to the policy last summer at the national policy forum had already sparked union discontent, seen as attempts to appease business interests.

Recent reports suggested the new draft was more lenient towards business needs, especially regarding fire and rehire practices and zero hours contracts. The Financial Times indicated the draft included language allowing businesses to restructure for viability and offered limited bans on zero hours contracts.

Labour has also faced criticism for scaling back its 2021 green energy investment plans from £28bn, highlighting ongoing internal party struggles to balance progressive policies with electoral pragmatism.

Union leaders remain vigilant, determined to ensure Labour’s more radical policies do not face further dilution. As the election campaign heats up, Starmer and his team must navigate these tensions to maintain crucial union support.

Historic Win for Workers: Lord Woodley’s Anti-Fire and Rehire Bill Passes Unopposed
House of Lords Backs Landmark Legislation to Protect Workers’ Rights

In a significant victory for workers’ rights, Lord Tony Woodley’s Employment and Trade Union Rights (Dismissal and Re-engagement) Bill passed unopposed at its third reading in the House of Lords on Friday. This pivotal legislation aims to protect employees from dismissal and re-engagement under inferior terms, mandating employers to conduct thorough consultations and disclose relevant information regarding any contract changes.

Lord Woodley, former general secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union (T&G) and joint general secretary of Unite, passionately addressed the Lords, condemning the exploitative practice of “fire and rehire.”

“Fire and rehire is a despicable tactic used by unscrupulous employers to rip off workers, cut costs, and boost profits,” Woodley stated. “I am thrilled to see this Bill progress in the House and grateful for the cross-party support it has received. This legislation marks a significant step towards eradicating this abusive practice.”

Woodley expressed gratitude to various individuals and organizations for their contributions to the Bill’s success. He acknowledged Unite for exposing the misuse of fire and rehire during the Covid-19 pandemic and Barry Gardiner, who championed a similar Private Member’s Bill in the Commons.

The Bill, crafted with the expertise of Lord Hendy and Professor Keith Ewing from the Institute of Employment Rights, also received robust backing from over 20 trade unions across the UK. Woodley emphasized the Labour Party’s commitment to combating exploitative employment practices as a key promise for the next election.

As the Bill moves to the Commons, it is expected to be championed by Labour MP Barry Gardiner, who anticipates strong opposition from the government. Gardiner, celebrating the Bill’s progress, shared on social media, “Great job Tony for taking the Stop Fire & Rehire Bill to the next stage. It’ll be an honour to pick up from where we left off in the Commons almost two years ago. The tragedy is that in the months in between, the government has done nothing. The next Labour government must and will.”

This legislative milestone brings the UK closer to eliminating the exploitative fire and rehire practice, ensuring fair treatment for workers and holding employers accountable.

Scottish Lecturers Strike for Fair Pay Amidst Cost-of-Living Crisis

Lecturers from colleges across Scotland have commenced a series of strikes today, expressing profound dissatisfaction over unresolved wage disputes. The Educational Institute of Scotland Further Education Lecturer Association (EIS-FELA) initiated the first of nine planned strike days spanning May and June, following unfruitful negotiations that have been ongoing since 2022.

In an effort to break the impasse, EIS-FELA presented a revised four-year pay proposal last Thursday. However, the response from employers fell short of the union’s expectations, leaving no choice but to proceed with the strike action this week.

A spokesperson for EIS expressed their disappointment, stating, “Despite presenting a revised pay claim to College Employers Scotland (CES), we received no guarantees on key aspects of the pay increase or other elements of the claim.”

The lecturing staff’s commitment to their students remains unwavering, as they yearn to return to their teaching duties and assist students in achieving their academic goals. Nevertheless, they stand united in their quest for a fair pay rise, which they believe is essential to mitigate the financial strain and stress inflicted by the current cost-of-living crisis.

Gavin Donoghue, the director of CES, has declared the offer of a £5,000 consolidated pay increase over three academic years, starting from September 2022, as the “full and final” proposal. He urges EIS-FELA to halt the escalation of strike actions and to conduct a formal ballot among their members regarding the offer.

and finally, Apprenticeship Levy Backfires, Undermining Training Schemes, Report Warns
Government’s Apprenticeship Levy Faces Criticism for Harming Training Programs

The government’s Apprenticeship Levy, introduced to boost trainee employment, is backfiring and undermining apprentice training schemes, a new report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and the Youth Futures Foundation warned today.

The report highlights that the scheme incentivizes employers to “rebadge” existing staff training as apprenticeships to claim funding, rather than genuinely investing in new trainees. A survey of over 2,000 organizations revealed these “worrying unintended consequences,” with many employers repurposing existing training programs to draw from the levy fund.

Introduced in 2017, the Apprenticeship Levy requires employers with a pay bill of £3 million or more to pay a 0.5% tax. This money goes into a fund that employers can use to finance apprenticeship programs. However, the report indicates this system is eroding traditional apprenticeship pathways.

Peter Cheese, chief executive of CIPD, emphasized the detrimental impact on young people: “The evidence in this report shows clearly that young people most need and benefit from apprenticeships, and that the erosion of this pathway has had a negative impact on social mobility for the most disadvantaged.”

Cheese called for “an apprenticeship guarantee” to reclaim apprenticeships for young people and reverse the decline in opportunities for them.

Barry Fletcher, chief executive of the Youth Futures Foundation, added, “International evidence shows apprenticeships are an important and impactful way to support young people in preparing for and accessing jobs. Yet, apprenticeship participation has fallen significantly for young people, especially those most marginalized in recent years.”

The Trade Union Congress (TUC) also called for reforms to the scheme. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak stated, “Funds raised by the apprenticeship levy are being underspent or misused. Every worker should have the chance to raise their skills, progress their career, and improve their situation. The scheme needs reform to allow more flexibility so that it benefits more workers, has greater quality control, and targets those who need it most.”

Nowak concluded, “Training pays for itself. Revitalizing our skills system should be a core part of a new UK industrial strategy. That’s how we can get the economy growing again so that we are all better off.”

As criticisms mount, it is clear that the Apprenticeship Levy, while well-intentioned, requires significant changes to effectively support the development of the UK’s workforce.

Keir Starmer picture
By Chris McAndrew – https://api20170418155059.azure-api.net/photo/X9dwBvuR.jpeg?crop=MCU_3:4&quality=80&download=trueGallery: https://beta.parliament.uk/media/X9dwBvuR, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=61331023

Union News 14th of May 2024

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,969 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News This week: Government Benefit Overhaul Sparks Criticism from Campaigners, WASPI Women Await Compensation: Prime Minister Faces Tough Questions, Teachers ‘Morally Blackmailed’ into Excessive Workloads, Union Warns, High Court Greenlights Challenge to Government’s Anti-Strike Laws, Firefighters Urged to Refrain from Assisting Police in Removing Pro-Palestine Protesters, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy, and finally, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg.

Government Benefit Overhaul Sparks Criticism from Campaigners

Campaigners are voicing sharp criticism against the government’s recent benefit overhaul, arguing that it pushes single mothers and others on razor-thin margins deeper into financial instability.

Under the new rules implemented today, universal credit claimants earning less than £892 will be required to search for additional or higher-paying work. Failure to meet these expectations could result in the loss of benefits altogether.

The threshold has notably increased from £617 for individuals and £988 for couples. Now, individuals are expected to earn at least £1,437, a significant jump.

This means that individuals working less than 18 hours a week on minimum wage will now have to actively seek more employment opportunities. Additionally, those working less than half of a full-time week will face more frequent meetings with their work coach to boost earnings or risk penalties.

The Department for Work and Pensions estimates that around 180,000 people will be affected by these changes.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak defended the reforms, stating that “welfare should always be a safety net and not a lifestyle choice.” He believes the changes will help more people on universal credit transition into well-paid jobs and achieve financial independence.

However, Michael Clarke, head of information programmes at anti-poverty charity Turn2us, disagrees. Clarke argues that the threshold rises severely challenge those juggling jobs with irregular or fluctuating incomes and balancing responsibilities like childcare.

“For single mothers and others on razor-thin margins, these adjustments risk tipping them into crisis, exacerbating financial insecurity and mental stress as they struggle to meet the new demands,” Clarke stated.

He emphasized the importance of a support system that truly aids those in need rather than penalizing them.

These reforms come in the wake of other welfare changes announced by Mr. Sunak last month, including a review into Personal Independent Payment (PIP), a non means-tested benefit aiding individuals with extra costs due to long-term disability or ill health.

Sunak pledged to reduce the number of those with mental health conditions claiming PIP and introduce a more “rigorous” approach, sparking criticism from campaigners who accuse him of launching a “full-on assault” on disabled people.

WASPI Women Await Compensation: Prime Minister Faces Tough Questions

During this week’s Prime Minister’s Questions session, SNP MP Chris Law directed a pointed query to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak regarding the much-anticipated compensation for WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) women. Law pressed, “Can the Prime Minister finally set out when the WASPI women will receive the compensation they rightly deserve?”

The discussion referenced a motion passed by the Scottish Government advocating for “compensation in full” for the 3.8 million affected women. Responding to the inquiry, Sunak acknowledged the gravity of the issue, stating, “I understand the strong feelings across the Chamber on this topic, and the desire for urgency in addressing them.” He emphasized the need to meticulously review the comprehensive findings of the ombudsman’s five-year investigation before providing an update to the House.

The awaited report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO), released in March, recommended payments ranging from £1,000 to £2,950, urging Parliament to take decisive action on the matter. Echoing sentiments from various MPs, who have advocated for larger payouts, the Prime Minister highlighted the government’s commitment to ensuring pensioners’ dignity and security in retirement, citing recent increases to the state pension.

Members of the PHSO, appearing before a parliamentary committee, suggested that some WASPI women might merit payments exceeding the recommended levels outlined in the report. Interim PHSO ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath acknowledged the possibility of direct financial loss for certain individuals beyond those included in the sample cases studied.

WASPI chair Angle Madden reiterated the urgency of the matter, underscoring the financial hardships faced by many women as a result of delayed pensions. Madden emphasized the significant impact on those who had sacrificed full-time employment to care for loved ones, asserting the tangible financial consequences of such decisions.

As pressure mounts and expectations heighten, the quest for equitable compensation for WASPI women remains at the forefront of political discourse, underscoring the need for swift and substantive action to address this longstanding injustice.

Teachers ‘Morally Blackmailed’ into Excessive Workloads, Union Warns

Amid mounting concerns over the working conditions of teachers in Scotland, the Scottish Secondary Teachers Association (SSTA) has sounded the alarm, accusing educators of being “morally blackmailed” into accepting unsustainable levels of unpaid work.

Addressing delegates at the SSTA’s annual conference, union president Stuart Hunter highlighted the pervasive culture of excessive workloads, attributing it to a sense of obligation driven by the belief that additional tasks are necessary “for the sake of the kids.” Hunter lamented the toll this phenomenon takes on teachers’ mental health and called for an end to the cycle of emotional manipulation.

In the backdrop of Glasgow’s decision to slash 450 teaching positions over the next three years, Hunter criticized the lack of support for educators, noting the absence of vital roles such as social workers and educational psychologists. He denounced budget cuts as a political tactic, accusing authorities of prioritizing austerity measures over the well-being of teachers and students.

Meanwhile, the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT), hosting its own conference, highlighted the escalating crisis of violence and abuse faced by teachers in schools. NASUWT’s Scotland official, Mike Corbett, emphasized the urgent need for measures to address the effects of this alarming trend, citing recent incidents of weapon attacks on school premises.

Teachers’ safety concerns have been met with calls for immediate action from the Scottish government. While acknowledging the need for enhanced well-being support for school staff, officials stated that over £2 million has been allocated since October 2020 to address these issues.

As teachers and unions continue to raise the alarm on unsustainable workloads and safety risks in schools, pressure mounts on authorities to prioritize the welfare of educators and students alike in Scotland’s education system.

High Court Greenlights Challenge to Government’s Anti-Strike Laws

In a significant legal development, the High Court has granted permission for a judicial review of the government’s controversial Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023, a move hailed as a victory for workers’ rights.

Civil Service union PCS will spearhead the challenge against the legislation, which grants employers in specific sectors unprecedented powers to enforce minimum service levels during strike actions, effectively compelling workers to undermine their own protests or risk dismissal.

Both PCS and the Trades Union Congress (TUC) welcomed the court’s decision, viewing it as a crucial step in combating what they perceive as an assault on trade union freedoms.

PCS General Secretary Fran Heathcote condemned the government’s attempt to curtail workers’ right to strike, highlighting the effectiveness of previous strike actions undertaken by PCS members in securing concessions. Heathcote vowed to resist any erosion of workers’ rights and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to challenge the legislation through legal avenues.

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak echoed these sentiments, characterizing the Strikes Act as a regressive measure that undermines the fundamental right to strike. He criticized the government’s persistence in pushing through these reforms despite warnings about their potential unlawfulness and detrimental impact on industrial relations.

This legal setback for the government comes on the heels of private rail operators’ refusal to enforce minimum service regulations on striking train drivers represented by the union Aslef. The defiance of these regulations underscores the deep-seated resistance among workers to what they perceive as unjust constraints on their ability to collectively bargain and protest.

As the legal challenge gains momentum, workers and unions remain steadfast in their commitment to safeguarding the right to strike and challenging legislative measures that impede their ability to advocate for fair wages and working conditions.

Firefighters Urged to Refrain from Assisting Police in Removing Pro-Palestine Protesters

In a show of solidarity with the pro-Palestine movement, the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has issued a directive to its 32,000 members, urging them not to aid police in evicting protesters engaging in rooftop occupations of British factories manufacturing weapons for Israel.

The call to action comes in response to an incident in Leicester where firefighters from the Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service were summoned by police to address an occupation staged by supporters of the direct action group Palestine Action at the Israeli-owned Elbit Tactical Systems factory.

During the operation, firefighters were observed using an aerial appliance to remove a protester from the occupied building, sparking controversy over their involvement in what some perceive as a law enforcement activity.

In a message to firefighters following the incident, FBU General Secretary Matt Wrack underscored the primary role of firefighters in saving lives and protecting communities, emphasizing that there is no justification for their involvement in the removal of protesters. Wrack reiterated the union’s stance in supporting the rights of protesters and advocating for peace and justice in Gaza.

The FBU’s directive advises members to refrain from participating in law enforcement activities alongside the police, particularly in situations involving the removal of protesters. This stance aligns with previous instances where firefighters have declined police requests for assistance during rooftop occupations of arms factories targeted by campaigners.

John Nicholson of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine recalled an occasion when firefighters, upon being informed of the FBU’s policy on Palestine, opted not to assist police in removing protesters during an occupation at an Elbit UK factory in Oldham.

As tensions escalate in the region, pro-Palestine protests are expected to continue across Britain this weekend, highlighting ongoing international concerns over Israel’s military actions in Gaza and the plight of Palestinians seeking refuge amidst the conflict.

and finally, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy

James Watt, co-founder of the Scottish brewery and pub group BrewDog, has announced his decision to transition to the newly-created role of “captain and co-founder,” retaining his shares in the company. This move will see Chief Operating Officer James Arrow assume the position of CEO, marking a significant shift in leadership for the company.

Established in Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire, in 2007 by Watt and Martin Dickie, BrewDog has grown to encompass breweries and pubs worldwide, while maintaining its headquarters in Ellon, Aberdeenshire. Reflecting on his tenure as CEO, Watt expressed gratitude for the journey of the past 17 years, acknowledging the highs and lows experienced during his time at the helm.

However, Watt’s leadership has been marred by controversy in recent years, with BrewDog facing criticism over its marketing campaigns and workplace culture. Former employees publicly accused the company of fostering a “culture of fear” and “toxic attitudes” towards junior staff in an open letter in 2021. Furthermore, BrewDog drew ire earlier this year for its decision to abandon its commitment to the real living wage in favour of the minimum wage for new hires.

The announcement of Watt’s departure has been met with celebration by members of Unite, the union representing workers across BrewDog. Bryan Simpson, lead organiser for the hospitality sector at Unite, criticized Watt for presiding over a culture of bullying and mistreatment within the company. Simpson emphasized the need for BrewDog to address the concerns raised by workers and urged the company to prioritize improving pay and conditions in collaboration with the union.

As BrewDog undergoes this transition in leadership, it faces the challenge of rebuilding trust and addressing longstanding issues to foster a more positive and inclusive workplace environment for its employees.

Pension image:
Image by Frantisek Krejci from Pixabay
Brewdog
By https://www.facebook.com/brewdogofficial/?brand_redir=365381716870623, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69878398

Union News 7th of May 2024

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,156 words, 6 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg. This week: ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action, Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute, Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul, and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy.

ASLEF Train Drivers Begin More Strike Action

Rail passengers across the United Kingdom are facing significant disruptions due to strike action as a consequence of the failure of rail companies and government to resolve a two-year-long dispute over pay and working conditions. Train drivers affiliated with the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (ASLEF) are striking. The strikes have already begun and will continue on Wednesday and Thursday. Drivers are also banning overtime until Saturday, exacerbating the situation.

Southeastern, Southern, Thameslink, and Gatwick Express routes are the services affected.

The dispute centers around pay. ASLEF members have not received a pay rise in five years, leading to frustration and industrial action. formal talks between the operators and the union have not occurred for a year, making this the longest-ever rail industry dispute.

As action continues, commuters are left grappling with disrupted travel plans, and the pressure mounts on the government and rail companies involved to seek a resolution with ASLEF. Stay tuned for further updates as the situation unfolds.

Jobcentre Security Guards Stage 24-Hour Strike Over Pay Dispute

In a bold move, more than 1,000 security guards employed by G4S at Jobcentres across the country are set to walk out in a 24-hour strike starting tonight. The dispute centres around pay, with guards demanding fair compensation for their crucial role.

The GMB union, representing these guards, revealed that a recent survey found alarming rates of abuse suffered by its members. Shockingly, four out of five guards reported incidents of physical violence, including dog attacks and assaults by members of the public.

But it’s not just physical harm they face. Guards also endure daily verbal abuse, ranging from threats against their families to racist slurs and even death threats.

The strike action is scheduled for multiple dates, including May 13, 20, 28, and 29. GMB national officer Eamon O’Hearn emphasized the immense pressure these guards operate under, stating, “G4S and the Department for Work and Pensions are content to let guards scrape by on minimum wage. These survey results underscore the urgent need for change.”

This marks the first time that guards have united to demand better conditions. A spokesperson for G4S expressed disappointment at the decision and stated that the company is still attempting to reach an amicable agreement.

Disability Rights Advocates Slam Government’s Controversial PIP Overhaul

In a move that has sparked heated debate, the UK government has unveiled proposals to overhaul the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. While the government aims to address rising costs and streamline support, unions and disabled rights campaigners have raised serious objections.

Here’s what critics are saying about the proposed changes:

Charities and advocacy groups have labelled the government’s plans as “dangerous” and “reckless.” They argue that restricting access to PIP and replacing regular cash payments with other forms of provision could have devastating consequences for disabled individuals.
Concerns centre around the potential impact on vulnerable claimants who rely on consistent financial support. One-off grants may not adequately meet ongoing needs, leading to increased hardship.

The government’s emphasis on mental health conditions in the proposed reforms has drawn criticism. While it acknowledges the rise in PIP claims related to mental health, campaigners worry that the changes may inadvertently harm those with invisible disabilities3.
Critics argue that lump-sum grants may not address the ongoing challenges faced by individuals with fluctuating conditions. Regular cash payments provide stability, whereas one-off grants may fall short.

Disabled rights campaigners emphasize the need for a fair and compassionate welfare system. While the government aims to target support more accurately, critics fear that vulnerable claimants could slip through the cracks.

Removing the PIP assessment altogether for certain health conditions or disabilities may simplify bureaucracy, but it must not compromise essential assistance for those most in need.

As consultations begin, the government faces mounting pressure to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and safeguarding the well-being of disabled individuals. The outcome of this debate will shape the future of disability benefits in the UK.

and finally, Labour Faces Backlash as New Deal for Working People Sparks Controversy

In a dramatic turn of events, several unions have issued stern warnings to the Labour Party, urging them not to dilute their proposed New Deal for Working People. Recent reports in the Financial Times suggest that the party may be reconsidering some of its earlier commitments, leading to concerns among labour advocates.

Sharon Graham, General Secretary of Unite, minced no words: “Choosing May Day to signal a retreat from overhauling one of Europe’s worst employment rights frameworks is beyond ironic. If Labour fails to explicitly reaffirm their promise that the New Deal for Workers will be fully implemented within the first 100 days of office, they will cross a red line.”

The GMB union echoes the sentiment: “Working people are desperate for change, and we expect Labour to honour its pledges. The New Deal for Working People was agreed upon at the party’s national policy forum last summer, and Keir Starmer’s commitment to it remains crucial.”

The heart of the controversy lies in Labour’s stance on zero-hours contracts, affecting approximately 1.1 million workers in the UK. The original New Deal vowed to ban such contracts entirely, ensuring a minimum number of guaranteed hours for all. However, recent media commentary suggests a shift: Labour may not outright ban zero-hours contracts but will emphasize employers’ duty to provide contracts based on the preceding 12 weeks’ work.

A Labour spokesperson maintains that the New Deal remains a core part of their platform: “We will campaign vigorously on this ahead of the general election. Our commitment to delivering legislation within 100 days and consulting widely on implementation remains unchanged.”

The party’s revised plans align with decisions made at the national policy forum. These include creating a “single status” for all workers (except genuinely self-employed individuals) and reviewing parental leave within the first year of a Labour administration.

Trade union leaders are unyielding in their stance: “Any dilution of the New Deal for workers is wholly unacceptable. Labour must stand firm against corporate greed and prioritize the interests of working people. Attempts to water down this popular policy will face a robust response from the entire trade union movement.” – Mick Lynch, RMT General Secretary

“Working people deserve protection from business excesses, not concessions to the super-rich. We won’t accept any weakening of workers’ rights.” – Fran Heathcote, PCS General Secretary

As the debate intensifies, the fate of the New Deal hangs in the balance, with both political and practical implications for millions of workers across the country.

Union News, Saturday, 26 April, 2024

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,576 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Labour’s Bold Move: Extending Public Ownership of UK Railways Faces Scrutiny, Cleaners Threaten Industrial Action Over Real Living Wage at Royal Mail, International Workers Memorial Day 2024: Honouring Lives Lost and Advocating for Safety, Nurses in England Face Intense Stress: A Disturbing Trend, and finally, £116 sick pay ‘failing those with cancer’.

Labour’s Bold Move: Extending Public Ownership of UK Railways Faces Scrutiny

In a significant development, the Labour Party has reaffirmed its commitment to expanding public ownership of Britain’s railway network. The proposal, led by Shadow Transport Secretary Louise Haigh, aims to bring train operating franchises back under public control as their current contracts expire. Here are the key points:

Despite pressure from Labour’s pro-business faction, Haigh has stood firm, resisting any dilution or abandonment of the plan. This move represents a rare instance where Labour leader Keir Starmer has not cynically abandoned election promises made in 2020.

Taking franchises back into public hands is expected to benefit passengers significantly. Integration of services and simplified ticketing are long-standing issues that the privatized industry has repeatedly promised to address but failed to deliver.

Ending payments to private shareholders will allow better investment in the rail network. This move is a departure from the system introduced by former Prime Minister John Major, which allowed private companies to profit from rail operations.

While this step is considered radical by some, it is essential. Even under Conservative governments, four train operating franchises are currently state-run due to private operators’ failures.

Network Rail, responsible for infrastructure, is already publicly owned. The government’s proposal to establish Great British Railways aims to direct the entire industry, albeit with a continued role for private capital.

Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves would not allow rail privatization to cost the Exchequer a penny. Her stance underscores the financial considerations behind Labour’s plans.

And there are gaps in Labour’s strategy. The rolling stock companies (Roscos), which own the trains themselves, will remain in private hands.

As the debate unfolds, the nation watches closely. Will the vision for a publicly owned railway system become a reality? Only time will tell.

Cleaners Threaten Industrial Action Over Real Living Wage at Royal Mail

In a tense standoff, cleaners employed by Royal Mail’s facilities management arm are threatening industrial action if the company abandons the Real Living Wage commitment. Here are the key details:

Members of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) have vowed to resist any attempt by Royal Mail Property and Facilities Solutions (RMPFS) to backtrack on the voluntary agreement. This move comes after a number of employers, including Capita, have already shifted away from paying the Real Living Wage.

Delegates at the CWU’s annual conference in Bournemouth approved this approach. The motion, discussed in private, expresses concern about the trend away from fair wages.

The CWU has made strides by using the voluntary agreement to ensure that its lowest-paid members receive at least £12 per hour. This includes cleaners working across RMPFS’s extensive network of over 2,600 sites, making it one of Europe’s largest corporate real estates.
Ongoing Talks: While pay negotiations with RMPFS continue, the CWU remains steadfast. If RMPFS signals an intention to withdraw from paying the Real Living Wage to cleaning staff, the union will resist vigorously.

Royal Mail’s Owner: International Distribution Services (IDS), which owns Royal Mail, has yet to comment on the situation.

This is part of a wider trend. Capita, a major outsourcing company, recently joined Brewdog in abandoning the commitment to the Real Living Wage. Their rationale cites affordability concerns.

Fearing a domino effect, unions suspect that more companies may follow suit. In January, the CWU expressed strong disapproval of this “disgraceful decision” that could significantly impact workers’ livelihoods.

As the battle over fair wages unfolds, the eyes of workers and employers alike remain fixed on the outcome.

International Workers Memorial Day 2024: Honouring Lives Lost and Advocating for Safety

On April 28, 2024, the world observes International Workers Memorial Day (IWMD) —a solemn occasion to remember workers who paid the ultimate price while striving to earn a living. These are the individuals who left for work one day and never returned, leaving behind grieving families and communities.

IWMD unites the global trade union movement in a collective act of remembrance. It serves as a stark reminder that more people lose their lives at work than in wars. These aren’t mere statistics; they represent real individuals—mothers, fathers, siblings, and friends—who faced preventable tragedies due to workplace hazards.

Beyond remembrance, IWMD is a call to action. It demands that we fight for the living—to ensure that every worker returns home safely at the end of their shift. As we honor those we’ve lost, we also advocate for robust safety measures, fair wages, and dignified working conditions.

This year’s theme underscores the intersection of environmental challenges and workers’ well-being. As the climate crisis intensifies, workers face increased risks—from extreme weather events to exposure to hazardous substances. IWMD prompts us to address these issues collectively, recognizing that a healthy planet is inseparable from healthy workers.

Throughout history, employer and government failures have led to preventable worker deaths. Trade unions have fought tirelessly for legislative changes to protect safety rights. On this IWMD, we reflect on these pivotal moments and recommit ourselves to safeguarding workers’ lives.

As the sun rises on April 28, 2024, let us remember the fallen, honor their memory, and stand up for the living. Whether you’re a union member, an advocate, or an ordinary citizen, your voice matters. Together, we can create workplaces where safety is paramount and lives are valued.

Nurses in England Face Intense Stress: A Disturbing Trend

In a concerning revelation, nurses in England have been grappling with unbearable stress, leading to significant time off work. Here are the key findings:

During 2023, nurses and health visitors took a staggering 1,675,275 days off sick due to stress, anxiety, or depression. This alarming figure highlights the immense strain faced by nursing staff.

On average, each of England’s 352,125 nurses and health visitors missed approximately 4.95 days of work due to stress-related conditions. These intense pressures are taking a toll on their mental health.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) warns that dangerous stress levels have become normalized within an NHS struggling to cope with demand. Chronic workforce shortages exacerbate the situation, leaving nursing staff running on empty.

Many nurses experience what’s known as “moral distress”—a situation where they recognize the care a patient needs but lack the resources to provide it. Extreme workloads contribute to this distress.

In 2023, for the first time, nurses leaving the NHS cited work-life balance as the primary reason, surpassing retirement. This shift underscores the urgent need for better support and improved working conditions.

With 34,709 vacancies in England, hospitals struggle to maintain adequate staffing levels. Nurses report feeling overwhelmed by the combination of staff shortages and high service demand.

One nurse expressed feeling stressed and anxious due to financial pressures, leading to serious mental health deterioration. The system’s shortcomings are taking a toll on dedicated healthcare professionals.

As we commemorate International Workers Memorial Day, let us remember the sacrifices made by nurses and advocate for their well-being. Their tireless efforts deserve recognition and support.

and finally, £116 sick pay ‘failing those with cancer’

Around a quarter of a million UK workers living with cancer are estimated to be struggling with covering essential costs due to inadequate statutory sick pay (SSP). This issue has prompted the Safe Sick Pay campaign, backed by cancer and health charities, to advocate for change. The campaign emphasizes that SSP should rise to be in line with a worker’s wages up to the Living Wage, in order to properly support cancer patients in their recovery and safe return to work.

The group has written to both Rishi Sunak and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, urging them to address this critical issue. Currently, SSP is set at £116.75 per week for up to 28 weeks, covering the days when someone is off work due to illness (except for the first three days). However, this amount does not offer adequate financial support for workers most in need.

The campaigners propose several key changes:

Increase SSP: The payment should be raised to match a worker’s wages up to the Living Wage.
First-Day Coverage: SSP should be payable from the first day of sickness.
Earnings Threshold: Abolish the earnings threshold so that part-time workers currently ineligible can receive some sick pay entitlement.
Timely Benefits: Ensure that benefits such as Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC) are made available promptly when needed.


By reforming sick pay and providing faster support through the benefits system, we can reduce financial hardship for people during their treatment and aftercare, including those living with cancer. Moreover, these changes would benefit not only cancer patients but also individuals with other long-term conditions, enabling them to safely and securely return to work12.

It’s crucial that policymakers address this issue promptly to alleviate the financial burden faced by cancer patients and ensure their well-being during recovery and beyond.

Picture credit

Manchester Memorial
By Jungpionier – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=742187
Cancer patient
Image by Pexels from Pixabay

Union News 21st of April 2024

Advertisements
Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,443 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reports are by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits, SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers, Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns, Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers, and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote.

Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ignited a firestorm with his unveiling of sweeping changes to disability benefits, sparking accusations of a “full-on assault” on disabled individuals. Sunak’s proposals include stringent reforms to the Personal Independent Payment (PIP) system, aiming to tighten eligibility criteria and introduce greater medical scrutiny for claimants.

In response to what he termed a “sick-note culture,” Sunak also announced plans to shift responsibility for sick notes away from GPs, igniting concerns among mental health advocates already grappling with overstretched services. Critics argue that the proposed changes risk plunging disabled people into destitution, with some accusing the government of targeting the most vulnerable amidst economic challenges.

Furthermore, Sunak’s pledge to sanction benefits for non-compliance with work coach conditions, along with the threat of benefit removal after 12 months of unemployment, has drawn sharp rebuke from welfare organizations, who argue that punitive measures exacerbate financial insecurity and undermine public trust.

As debate intensifies, concerns over the broader impact on NHS waiting lists and workforce shortages loom large, with calls for a more compassionate approach to welfare reform that prioritizes holistic support and addresses systemic complexities.

SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers

In a surprising turn of events, the SNP-Green coalition in Scotland, backed by Tory MSPs, has quashed Scottish Labour MSP Mark Griffin’s bid to bolster assistance for workers injured on the job. Griffin’s Employment Injuries Advisory Council (SEIAC) Bill aimed not only to establish a new employment injury benefit but also to institute a council of experts, including trade unions, to guide its implementation and monitor progress.

Despite SNP First Minister Humza Yousaf’s recent pledges to prioritize support for workers and their families, his government’s alliance with Tory MSPs led to the rejection of the legislation. SNP social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville defended the decision, stating, “We do not need this Bill,” while acknowledging Griffin’s efforts and their potential contribution to future initiatives.

Reacting to the outcome, Griffin expressed disappointment, accusing the government of abandoning frontline workers grappling with long-term effects of Covid-19, firefighters battling cancer, and former footballers afflicted by dementia. He criticized Yousaf’s administration for failing to accelerate progress toward a more equitable industrial injuries system in Scotland and vowed to continue advocating for workers’ rights.

The contentious rejection underscores tensions within Scottish politics over strategies to address worker welfare and underscores the challenges facing efforts to enact meaningful legislative reforms.

Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns

A recent survey conducted by the Sutton Trust has shed light on the concerning trend of staff cuts in schools across the UK, prompting teaching unions to criticize the government’s handling of education funding. According to the survey, more than two-thirds of senior leaders in schools reported having to reduce the number of teaching assistants this year.

Additionally, one in three senior leaders stated that they had to cut teaching staff, while nearly half had to reduce support staff. The impact was particularly pronounced in primary schools, where teaching assistant cuts were highest, while secondary schools experienced greater losses in both teaching and support staff.

Reacting to these findings, Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, expressed shock at the extent of the cuts, noting that three-quarters of primary schools had to reduce the number of teaching assistants to make ends meet. He criticized the government’s lack of seriousness regarding education funding and urged it to wake up to the reality faced by schools nationwide.

Dr. Patrick Roach, the general secretary of NASUWT, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing that children from less affluent backgrounds are disproportionately affected by these cuts, resulting in a compromised quality of education. He criticized the government’s failure to invest adequately in education and called for a new government to address the ongoing crisis in schools.

In response, the Department for Education defended its stance, stating that school funding has been increased to £60.7 billion this year, the highest level ever in real terms per pupil. However, critics argue that despite the increase in funding, the allocation is insufficient to meet the growing needs of schools, leading to staff cuts and resource reallocation.

As the debate over education funding intensifies, the future of staffing levels and the quality of education in UK schools remains uncertain, with calls for comprehensive solutions to address the funding gap and ensure equitable access to education for all students.

Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers

A landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court this week has bolstered the position of workers facing penalties or discrimination for engaging in strike action. The ruling, which criticizes British trade union laws for inadequately protecting workers’ rights, marks a significant victory for labour rights advocates.

In a scathing critique, the court highlighted the failure of current legislation to shield workers from sanctions short of dismissal during strikes, deeming it incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Lady Ingrid Simler, delivering the judgment, emphasized that the ability of employers to impose punitive measures undermines the fundamental right to lawful strike action.

The case, brought forward by the Unison union on behalf of care worker Fiona Mercer, sheds light on the plight of workers facing repercussions for participating in industrial action. Mercer’s battle against her employer, Alternative Futures Group (AFG), over cuts to payments for sleep-in shifts, exemplifies the challenges workers encounter when asserting their rights.

Despite initial victories in lower courts, the intervention of high-ranking figures sought to overturn favourable rulings, prompting Unison to escalate the case to the Supreme Court. Following the verdict, Mercer expressed satisfaction, stating that while it wouldn’t change her experience, it would serve as a deterrent to unscrupulous employers.

Unison’s general secretary, Christina McAnea, hailed the ruling as the most significant industrial action case in decades, while Paul Nowak of the TUC described it as a monumental victory for the union movement. However, some caution against excessive optimism, noting that the legal landscape still poses challenges to effective labour activism.

Nevertheless, the judgment is seen as a positive step forward, prompting calls for broader campaigns to defend workers’ rights. The implications extend beyond the immediate case, with university lecturers and other workers hopeful for redress for past punitive actions taken against them.

and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote

In a significant development, Amazon has been dealt a decisive setback as the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) ruled in favour of GMB’s union recognition application at its Coventry warehouse. The ruling marks a milestone in GMB’s efforts and brings Europe one step closer to witnessing the first recognized union at Amazon.

After over a year of industrial action and 30 strike days, the CAC’s decision signals a turning point in the ongoing struggle for union representation at the tech giant’s facilities. The committee has mandated that an independent organization be appointed to oversee a legally binding vote of workers, indicating a crucial phase in the process.

Amanda Gearing, senior organizer at GMB, hailed the ruling as a historic moment in the battle for workers’ rights at Amazon. She likened the journey to a modern-day David and Goliath struggle, emphasizing the resilience of workers against the company’s formidable anti-union tactics.

Gearing highlighted the demands of Amazon workers for fair wages and safe working conditions, stressing the importance of dignity at work and the need for a union to advocate for their interests.

In response to the ruling, an Amazon spokesperson reiterated the company’s stance on employee rights, stating, “Our employees have the choice of whether or not to join a union. They always have.”

As the process moves forward, anticipation mounts for the upcoming ballot, with workers poised to make a crucial decision that could reshape the landscape of labour relations within Amazon’s operations. The outcome of the vote holds implications not only for the Coventry warehouse but also for the broader discourse on workers’ rights and unionization in the tech industry.

If you’ve enjoyed Union News please consider subscribing to the Union News YouTube channel.

Union News 17 April 2024

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,938 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement in the UK. Writing is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: reports from the Scottish TUC conference, Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court, New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’ and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster.

Scottish trade unions oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors

During the initial session of the annual Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), delegates voiced strong support for defending Scotland’s NHS and criticized the SNP-Green Scottish government’s longstanding plans for a national care service (NCS).

Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.

Unison has consistently raised concerns about the NCS proposals, arguing that while they suggest a publicly owned and accountable organization akin to the NHS, they would actually result in much of the care sector being controlled by the voluntary sector and private companies.

Key points of contention include the lack of national sectoral bargaining, reduced local democratic oversight, and the potential side-lining of council social work departments as primary care providers.

Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.

Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatization” of Scotland’s NHS.

The motion called for the STUC to build on previous successes in advocating for progressive tax measures to generate additional funds for public services. It also proposed conducting research to expose instances of backdoor privatization within the NHS in Scotland.

Drew Gilchrist of the North Lanarkshire TUC, himself an NHS worker, stressed the importance of such research in mobilizing a campaign to stop and reverse privatization while advocating for increased investment in services and the workforce.

Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.

Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court

Parcelforce delivery drivers, who are members of the IWGB union, are taking legal action against Royal Mail, alleging that they have been unfairly denied fundamental rights. These drivers argue that they have been misclassified in their employment status and deprived of basic entitlements. The lawsuit, which could involve thousands of Parcelforce drivers across the UK, seeks to compel Royal Mail to compensate them for potential shortfalls in their pay, which could amount to millions.

Previously categorized as self-employed ‘owner drivers,’ many Parcelforce drivers were denied rights such as the National Living Wage and holiday pay. Leigh Day, the legal firm representing the drivers, contends that they should be classified as ‘workers,’ affording them greater rights and potential compensation for past discrepancies in pay.

Concerns were initially raised by three drivers who sought assistance from their union, the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB). With support from the IWGB and legal representation from Leigh Day, these drivers brought claims to the Employment Tribunal. Recognizing the broader implications of these issues, Leigh Day expanded the case into a group claim.

This legal challenge against Royal Mail follows a significant precedent set in a previous case involving Uber drivers, wherein the Supreme Court ruled in favour of classifying them as workers rather than self-employed contractors. This landmark decision laid the groundwork for similar disputes across the gig economy, offering hope to Parcelforce drivers seeking justice.

Marc Francis, a former Parcelforce delivery driver, recounts his experience of working without rights or protections, emphasizing the need for justice for himself and his fellow drivers. The IWGB echoes these sentiments, condemning Royal Mail’s alleged exploitation of its workers and urging affected drivers to join the claim for rightful compensation.

Liana Wood, a solicitor at Leigh Day, emphasizes the importance of recognizing Parcelforce drivers as entitled to workers’ rights, including holiday pay and the national minimum wage. With deteriorating working conditions and decreasing take-home pay, thousands of owner drivers are believed to be eligible to participate in the claim for fair treatment.

STUC Congress Grapples with Cuts: Calls for No-Cuts Budgets

At the STUC Congress in Dundee this month, discussions were dominated by the impact of cuts across Scottish councils, leading to significant job losses over the past 15 years. While calls to support no-cuts budgets were made, they did not gain widespread backing. Clydebank TUC proposed backing such budgets as a strategy to challenge austerity policies, but the general council raised concerns about legality and called for a more practical approach.

Despite this, trades union councils from North Lanarkshire, Fife, and Dundee supported Clydebank’s motion with fervent speeches defending council workers and services. Fife’s Tam Kirby criticized the general council’s cautious approach, arguing for a more aggressive stance against cuts, even if it meant challenging the law.

Referring to STUC president Mike Arnott’s earlier address, Dundee’s Stuart Fairweather emphasized the need for councillors to champion their areas and oppose cuts rather than passively implementing them.

Closing the debate, Clydebank’s Janet Cassidy acknowledged the likely defeat of the motion but stressed the ongoing demand for political challenge against cuts.

Despite support from most trades councils, the motion was ultimately defeated in a card vote. Reflecting on the outcome, delegate Tam Morrison highlighted the urgent need to end cuts, emphasizing that past approaches have failed to prevent significant job losses. While the vote didn’t go their way, the case against cuts remains compelling, signalling a call to grassroots action to bring about change.

Support for key postal service at STUC conference

The Scottish Trade Union Congress has unanimously supported efforts to safeguard essential postal services and protect postal workers.

There are growing concerns among both workers and customers about the potential threat to the universal service obligation (USO) provided by Royal Mail. This obligation ensures a consistent, one-price delivery service across the UK six days a week. Despite earlier assurances from former business secretary, Vince Cable, regarding the preservation of the USO following Royal Mail’s privatization, there are now indications that the company may seek to abandon this guarantee.

Craig Anderson, regional secretary of the Communication Workers Union, expressed appreciation for the congress’s endorsement of the union’s campaign to not only defend the USO but also to enhance the role of postal workers within communities. Anderson emphasized the broader significance of Royal Mail’s services beyond delivering letters and parcels, emphasizing their role in connecting and supporting communities.

He stressed the importance of prioritizing communities and preserving the USO as a crucial element in maintaining social cohesion. Anderson called for Royal Mail and regulators to support the service, support the workers, and invest in the future of public postal services rather than succumbing to cost-cutting measures.

Scottish trade unions come together to oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors

During the initial session of the annual Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), delegates voiced strong support for defending Scotland’s NHS and criticized the SNP-Green Scottish government’s longstanding plans for a national care service (NCS).

Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.

Unison has consistently raised concerns about the NCS proposals, arguing that while they suggest a publicly owned and accountable organization akin to the NHS, they would actually result in much of the care sector being controlled by the voluntary sector and private companies.

Key points of contention include the lack of national sectoral bargaining, reduced local democratic oversight, and the potential side-lining of council social work departments as primary care providers.

Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.

Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatisation” of Scotland’s NHS.

The motion called for the STUC to build on previous successes in advocating for progressive tax measures to generate additional funds for public services. It also proposed conducting research to expose instances of backdoor privatization within the NHS in Scotland.

Drew Gilchrist of the North Lanarkshire TUC, himself an NHS worker, stressed the importance of such research in mobilizing a campaign to stop and reverse privatization while advocating for increased investment in services and the workforce.

Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.

New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’

Over half of NHS workers suffer from poor mental health, and one in four has even considered suicide due to the challenges they face.

NHS Charities Together say that 52 percent of staff suffer anxiety and 51 percent suffer from low mood.

Frontline 19 has a campaign highlighting that, in many cases, NHS staff are sicker than the patients they are treating.

Group founder Claire Goodwin-Fee said: “The most common reason for sickness absence was poor mental health, responsible for over half a million days lost in one month.”

You can watch the campaign video titled “Sicker Than The Patients” on their website.
Frontline19 is a free and confidential service specifically designed for frontline workers, including those in the National Health Service and other frontline services in the UK.

and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster

Water companies have handed nearly 80 billion to investors since the industry was privatised more than 30 years ago.

Since the privatization of England’s water companies in 1989, they have consistently paid out substantial dividends to shareholders.

English water companies are estimated to pay around £14.7 billion in dividends by the end of this decade.

These dividends benefit shareholders but come at a cost to customers, who are also footing the bill for sewage cleanup and other investments.

When water companies were privatized, they were debt-free. Thatcher wrote off the industry’s £5 billion debt at public expense. However, over the years, they have accumulated significant debt again.

As of now, the big nine water companies in England have a combined debt of £54 billion.
This debt burden has raised concerns, especially considering the critical role water companies play in maintaining infrastructure and environmental standards.

Gary Smith of trade union GMB said: “Splashing out fortunes in dividends while racking up enormous debts is a farce.”

The average water and sewage bill in England and Wales rose from £408 in 2021 to £448 from the start of this month. And huge bill increases are expected between 2025 and 2030 to help fund long-overdue investment.

Water companies have also faced criticism for paying large sums to executives while dealing with issues like leaky infrastructure and sewage dumping.

A Solidarity union spokeswoman commented: “Water privatisation has been a disaster. Years of under investment while debt mounted and dividends were paid out. Now customers will be asked to make that money up through higher prices. The obvious answer to this mismanagement is nationalisation but the level of debt built up is one it would be challenging for the State to take on – 54 billion, a far cry from the 5 billion debt written off in 1979 to pave the way for privatisation. Many still believe nationalisation is the way forward but it will be a difficult path now.”

Union News 6th of April 2024

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,525 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Teachers at NEU Conference Demand Stronger Action on Pay Dispute, Cleaners, Porters, and Caterers Face Privatization Threat at East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, “Titanic” Equal Pay Claims: Scottish Government Urged to Act, NEU Conference Urges UK Government to Endorse Palestinian Rights, “Desperate Need of Reform”: TUC Urges Overhaul of Statutory Sick Pay, and finally, ONS Staff Strike: Union Takes a Stand Against Mandatory Office Attendance.

Teachers at NEU Conference Demand Stronger Action on Pay Dispute

In a decisive move, teachers attending the National Education Union (NEU) conference in Bournemouth voted to take a stand on the government’s pay offer. The motion, passed on Thursday, calls for a snap poll to gauge members’ views. If the majority rejects the offer with a convincing turnout, the union will escalate its efforts by pushing for a formal strike ballot.

This decision follows last week’s overwhelming vote by NEU members in favor of strikes over pay in a consultative ballot. While the NEU national executive initially proposed avoiding a formal ballot this year, delegates fought to go beyond leadership recommendations. An amendment now instructs the NEU to present the government’s pay and funding offer in a snap poll. If rejected, a formal ballot for strikes will be pursued.

Notably, a significant minority—37 percent—voted even more clearly in favor of moving toward a formal strike ballot after the consultative vote. This signals a strong desire among rank-and-file activists within the union for a more militant approach than what the leadership initially proposed.

Paul, an NEU member from Tower Hamlets, emphasized the importance of the vote: “While achieving a formal ballot would have been ideal, the substantial result demonstrates that the best activists in the union want to go further. A serious number of people are ready to push for national industrial action.”

Daniel Kebede, NEU union general secretary, made an unusual intervention during the conference by arguing against a formal strike ballot. Delegates on the conference floor expressed a clear desire for hard-hitting action to address the ongoing pay dispute.

As the NEU continues its fight for fair pay and better conditions, teachers across the country are watching closely, ready to stand united in defense of their rights.

Cleaners, Porters, and Caterers Face Privatization Threat at East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

In a startling development, cleaners, porters, and caterers employed by the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) have been informed that their jobs may be moved out of the NHS. Chief executive Nick Hulme’s letter to staff revealed plans to privatize housekeeping, security, and other services at Colchester and Ipswich hospitals, as well as ESNEFT’s community services.

While Ipswich Hospital’s facilities are currently outsourced to private company OCS (with the contract ending in April next year), the ESNEFT board has now decided to put all services out to a single tender over the next 12 months. Unison Eastern head of health, Caroline Hennessy, expressed concern, stating, “Workers are being thrown to the wolves so that some private company can milk cash out of the health service.”

The decision has sparked outrage among staff, who believe that bringing facilities management back in-house would lead to better treatment for employees and higher-quality services for patients. As the battle unfolds, Nick Hulme and the board may find themselves facing a determined workforce unwilling to accept this attack lying down.

“Titanic” Equal Pay Claims: Scottish Government Urged to Act

Equal pay claims in Scotland’s councils are likened to the ill-fated Titanic approaching an iceberg, warns GMB Scotland. The union has called on the Scottish government to intervene urgently as councils across the country continue to ignore workers’ demands.

Strikes in Progress:
A four-day strike is already underway among low-paid, predominantly female carers at Falkirk Council.
Workers in Renfrewshire and West Dunbartonshire are set to follow suit next week after regrading claims were rejected.

The ongoing strikes represent only the tip of the iceberg. GMB Scotland is already involved in equal pay campaigns in Dundee, Perth and Kinross, Fife, and Moray.
Over a dozen other councils face mounting calls for pay reviews.

GMB Scotland’s Louise Gilmour warns that workers cannot bear the burden of potential council bankruptcies. If councils continue to ignore the issue, the consequences could be disastrous.

Gilmour urges First Minister Humza Yousaf to establish a specialist body. This body would adjudicate on claims and enforce compensation awards.

The reality of equal pay claims cannot be ignored, and local authorities must act swiftly.

The scale of these claims is unimaginable for councils already facing service cuts.
Blaming equal pay claims instead of addressing systematic pay discrimination is both dishonest and disgraceful.

Gilmour emphasized that women workers will prevail in these claims.
Proper management now is crucial to prevent disastrous consequences for communities.
Equal pay is not going away. Let us learn from past mistakes and ensure justice prevails.

NEU Conference Urges UK Government to Endorse Palestinian Rights

In a resounding show of solidarity, delegates at the National Education Union (NEU) conference in Bournemouth have called on the British government to cease its role as an enabler of Israel’s apartheid policies, violence, and anti-Palestinian racism.

The motion, passed on Thursday, unequivocally condemns the Israeli government as “racist” and asserts that it “has a case to answer on genocide.” The NEU delegates assert that Israel’s current hard-right, racist government significantly contributes to conflict, violence, and war in both Palestine and Israel.

This bold stance should embolden NEU members to take action during the Palestine day of action on Wednesday, May 1. Delegates remained defiant even after Tory education secretary Gillian Keegan criticized the motion as “inappropriate” and reflective of the NEU’s “divisive ideology.”

Another speaker from the floor challenged Keegan directly: “Keegan should visit staff rooms and witness the revulsion against the killing of children and women, as well as the bombing of schools. What truly divides us is supporting an apartheid regime abroad and perpetuating anti-Muslim rhetoric at home.”

The motion also highlights the British government’s attempts to “criminalize the peaceful tactics of boycott, divestment, and sanctions” and its efforts to stigmatize solidarity with Palestinians. In response, the NEU union commits to publishing and circulating educational resources that enhance members’ understanding of Palestine and Israel. The union further reaffirms its support for the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC).

As the NEU takes this principled stand, educators across the country join hands in advocating for justice, human rights, and a peaceful resolution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

“Desperate Need of Reform”: TUC Urges Overhaul of Statutory Sick Pay

Statutory sick pay in the UK remains shockingly inadequate, leaving low-paid workers vulnerable and without essential financial support during illness. As of today, April 6, 2024, the weekly statutory sick pay rate will increase to £116.75, but this still represents a mere 17 percent of average earnings.

Workers face a three-day waiting period before receiving statutory sick pay.
For someone working a typical five-day week, this amounts to a paltry £44 for the first week—just 7 percent of average weekly earnings.

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) demands urgent action. It says the government should:
Remove the lower earnings limit.

The TUC say that the government should:

Raise the rate of sick pay.
Eliminate the three-day waiting period.

The Covid-19 pandemic exposed the desperate need for reform in the sick pay system.
Gender Disparities. Analysis by the TUC reveals that 1.3 million people do not earn enough to qualify for statutory sick pay. Shockingly, 70 percent of these individuals are women.

Zero-hours contract workers are eight times more likely to miss out on statutory sick pay due to insufficient earnings.

Urgent action is required to protect workers’ rights and financial well-being.
As the debate intensifies, the government must address these glaring inequalities and ensure that no worker is left without essential support during illness.

and finally, ONS Staff Strike: Union Takes a Stand Against Mandatory Office Attendance

PCS members at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) have delivered a resounding message: mandatory office attendance is unacceptable. Over 73 percent of staff have voted in favor of striking in response to the new policy that demands 40 percent physical workplace presence.

The new policy has caused considerable disruption, particularly for staff with childcare and other care responsibilities.

ONS had previously introduced successful home and hybrid working arrangements during the pandemic, even earning recognition as a finalist for the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s Best Flexible Working Initiative.

Staff were reassured that flexible arrangements would remain in place.
However, management’s heavy-handed approach has undermined trust and goodwill among ONS employees.

PCS argues that management’s case lacks evidence and refuses to consider a more gradual and flexible transition.

General Secretary Fran Heathcote calls for an immediate pause in policy implementation and meaningful dialogue to protect staff interests.

As the dispute unfolds, ONS bosses must recognize the importance of fair and sustainable working arrangements. The consequences of disregarding staff well-being could be

Union News (30 March 2024)

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

828 words, 4 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and Labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: Salaried Workers Face Minimum Wage Cheating: Unions Sound the Alarm, Teachers Rally for Fair Pay and Improved Conditions at NASUWT Conference, and GMB Secures Day One Sick Pay for 19,000 Care Workers.

Salaried Workers Face Minimum Wage Cheating: Unions Sound the Alarm

Unions are cautioning that office workers and other salaried staff may be vulnerable to being short-changed on the minimum wage.

Prior to the implementation of the new minimum wage rate on Monday, the TUC highlighted that salaried employees receive a fixed annual payment irrespective of fluctuations in their working hours.

According to the TUC, online job postings still advertise salaried positions below the upcoming minimum wage, potentially resulting in illegal underpayment for salaried workers if their salaries remain stagnant.

The TUC further warned that desk-based office workers often face expectations of unpaid overtime as part of their job responsibilities.

Paul Nowak, TUC’s general secretary, emphasized, “Employers have a legal obligation to pay their workers at least the minimum wage. However, many workers are being deprived of their rightful pay by unscrupulous employers who opt to pay unlawfully low wages. This issue affects workers across various professions, including desk-based office roles, where the expectation of unpaid overtime is common.”

Highlighting the disparity between the official adult minimum wage rate of £11.44 per hour and the voluntary “real” living wage of £12, and £13.15 in London, Katherine Chapman, director of the Living Wage Foundation, stated, “While the increase in the statutory national living wage is positive news for millions of low-paid workers, it still falls short of adequately addressing the true cost of living. Over 14,000 employers have pledged to pay the real living wage, recognizing its benefits not only for workers and their families but also for businesses in terms of improved staff retention and productivity.”

Responding to these concerns, a government spokesperson reiterated that paying the minimum wage is a legal requirement for all workers, including those in office roles. The spokesperson urged any employees who suspect they are not receiving their correct wages to either address the matter with their employer or seek assistance from Acas confidentially. Furthermore, the spokesperson highlighted the significant increase in the national living wage for workers aged 21 and above, emphasizing the positive impact this will have on their annual earnings.

Teachers Rally for Fair Pay and Improved Conditions at NASUWT Conference

At NASUWT’s annual conference, teachers unite behind a push for pay restoration and better working conditions. According to the union, classroom teachers have seen their starting salaries plummet by 21% in real terms between 2010 and 2023, adjusting for RPI inflation.

Addressing the assembly, senior vice-president Wayne Broom emphasized the urgency of tackling the crisis in teaching recruitment, retention, and morale. He pledged the union’s commitment to lobby all political parties ahead of the general election to secure a new deal for teachers, including real terms pay restoration nationwide.

The proposed deal also seeks to enhance measures protecting teachers from violence, assault, or harassment, establish a national framework for statutory contractual conditions of service, enforce a maximum 35-hour working time limit, and ensure equal rights for supply and substitute teachers.

and finally, GMB Secures Day One Sick Pay for 19,000 Care Workers

In a landmark victory for the care sector, the GMB union has secured day one sick pay for 19,000 care workers. This significant win comes as HC-One, the UK’s largest care provider, agrees to a pay deal granting carers the contractual right to receive at least Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) from the first day of any absence.

Previously, carers faced a three-day waiting period before receiving sick pay, creating a concerning incentive for workers to continue working while unwell and potentially spreading illnesses among the vulnerable individuals they care for.

The breakthrough agreement follows a GMB survey revealing that one in four HC-One care workers were contemplating leaving their jobs due to inadequate pay.

Natalie Grayson, GMB National Officer, expressed outrage at the previous lack of sick pay provisions, stating, “For any worker to suffer financial hardship due to illness is unacceptable. However, in the care sector, this issue is particularly alarming and poses a significant risk to the well-being of those under their care.”

She continued, “Day one sick pay is a fundamental right that care sector workers deserve. This victory signifies a pivotal moment in the culture of the entire care industry. But our fight doesn’t end here. GMB will continue to advocate until these dedicated professionals receive a fair wage of at least £15 per hour.”

The agreement marks a crucial step forward in ensuring the welfare of care workers and underscores the ongoing efforts to address longstanding issues within the sector.

Picture credit
Office image
Image by Nattanan Kanchanaprat from Pixabay

Union News (24th of March 2024)

Advertisements

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington. Music is by Tim Bragg.

Train Drivers to Strike Across 16 Companies and London Underground Next Month

Train drivers from 16 companies and the London Underground are set to stage a series of strikes next month, according to an announcement by the Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (Aslef).

The decision comes after tube drivers voted overwhelmingly in favour of walking out on April 8 and May 4. Their primary grievances revolve around the lack of assurances from management regarding changes to their terms and conditions. Aslef demands that any alterations be made through mutual agreement and that existing agreements be honoured.

Finn Brennan, the London Underground Aslef organizer, expressed concern over the establishment of a full-time team of managers tasked with imposing “massive changes” to drivers’ working conditions. The union fears that these changes could adversely impact their members.

In response, a Transport for London spokesperson clarified that the organization had no intentions of imposing changes unilaterally. They emphasized their commitment to safeguarding jobs and assured that discussions would precede any alterations.

Simultaneously, members of various train operators will initiate a rolling series of one-day strikes from April 5 to 8, accompanied by an overtime ban spanning April 4-6 and 8-9.

Mick Whelan, Aslef’s General Secretary, criticized the “ridiculous offer” presented by the Rail Delivery Group in April of the previous year. He called for meaningful negotiations on a new pay deal for train drivers. However, recent developments indicate that the parties involved are unwilling to resolve the dispute amicably.

The strike action will impact services across multiple companies:

April 5: Avanti West Coast, East Midlands Railway, West Midlands Trains, and CrossCountry.
April 6: Chiltern, GWR, LNER, Northern, and TransPennine Trains.
April 8: c2c, Greater Anglia, GTR Great Northern Thameslink, Southeastern, Southern/Gatwick Express, South Western Railway main line and depot drivers, and SWR Island Line.

Youth Wage Gap: 70% of Young Workers Face Financial Strain, TUC Analysis Reveals

The Trade Union Congress (TUC) has today revealed that seven in ten young workers are at risk of significant financial hardship due to the lower rate of the minimum wage they receive. The union federation has called for an overhaul of the “unfair” tiered rates system, which it says is penalising more than 700,000 workers aged between 18 and 20.

According to the TUC, the minimum wage pay penalty facing young workers this coming year is estimated to be £2,438 a year or £47 a week. The main rate is currently £10.42 per hour for over-23s, £10.18 for 21-22-year-olds, and just £7.49 per hour for 18-20-year-olds, with under-18s earning a mere £5.28 per hour.

Despite the rate for 21-year-olds and over due to rise to £11.44, the minimum wage for workers aged 18-20 is set to increase to just £8.60 per hour. This means they could be paid almost £3 less an hour than their older peers.

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak commented on the issue, stating: “Everyone should be paid fairly for the job they do. But too many young workers are still being left hugely out of pocket because of outdated youth rates of the national minimum wage.”

The TUC’s analysis comes ahead of its Young Workers Conference this weekend. The union is backing Labour’s New Deal, which pledges to introduce a real living wage for workers and ban zero-hours contracts.

Tom Kerridge, Policy and Research Manager at Centrepoint, added: “In normal times it would defy logic to leave under 23s earning significantly less than older workers for the same job. At a time when inflation has soared and the price of everything from utilities and rents to everyday essentials has become unaffordable for many, it is appalling.”

Government Under Fire: PHSO Report Reveals Pension Age Hike Left Millions of Women in Financial Distress

The UK government is facing mounting pressure to apologise and compensate thousands of women whose retirement plans were abruptly disrupted due to the increase in the retirement age. A five-year investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) released today found that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) failed to adequately inform about the rise in pension age.

The changes affected approximately 3.8 million women born after April 6, 1950. Many were unaware they would have to wait longer to receive their pension, leading to significant financial and emotional distress.

The 1995 Tory government’s Pension Act planned to raise the women’s state pension age from 60 to 65, aligning it with men’s. The change was to be implemented from 2010 to 2020. However, the 2011 Pension Act accelerated the timetable, bringing it forward to 2018, leaving many uninformed.

The PHSO report criticised the DWP for not acknowledging its failings and urged the department to apologise for the impact on those affected. Despite this, the DWP has indicated it will refuse to comply.

The report recommended that the affected women receive a payout between £1,000 and £2,950, falling under level four of the ombudsman’s “severity of injustice scale”. However, campaigners are calling for compensation of at least £10,000, corresponding to level six of the scale, which involves “devastating or irreversible injustice.”

The PHSO has asked Parliament to intervene and establish a compensation scheme swiftly. Angela Madden, chair of Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi), argued for a larger payout, stating it “far more clearly and reasonably recognises the injustice and loss of opportunities suffered.”

According to Waspi estimates, one person affected by the changes dies every 13 minutes. National Pensioners’ Convention general secretary Jan Shortt highlighted that “thousands of women have passed away since the campaign began, saving the government billions in unclaimed pension payments.”

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham labelled the DWP’s failures a “national disgrace.” The PHSO report found that the DWP’s handling of the age changes eroded the affected individuals’ sense of personal autonomy and financial control, preventing them from making informed choices about their finances.

Unison general secretary Christina McAnea said the rise had been “catastrophic for a whole generation of women” and “left their retirement plans in tatters.” She added, “It’s only right the thousands of women left in dire financial straits are given compensation now. This has all taken far too long.”

The prime minister’s official spokesman said the government would now “consider the ombudsman’s report and respond to their recommendations formally in due course.” A DWP spokesman stated, “The government has always been committed to supporting all pensioners in a sustainable way that gives them a dignified retirement.”

Protest in Leeds Demands Fair Pay and Support for Special Needs Education

School support staff and parents rallied outside Leeds Civic Hall, voicing their demands for better pay, increased funding, and improved support for children with special educational needs. The protest, organized by the General union GMB, highlighted critical issues faced by teaching assistants and students.

Key Demands:
End Poverty Pay: Teaching assistants on the lowest pay grade are grappling with what the GMB calls “poverty pay.” These essential workers deserve fair compensation for their crucial roles in education.
Special Needs Education: The placement of special needs children in mainstream schools has raised concerns. GMB emphasizes that this practice can lead to significant challenges and hinder effective learning.
More Specialized Schools: The government must invest in building more specialized schools to cater specifically to the needs of these students.
Challenges Faced:
Educational Psychologists Exodus: A shortage of educational psychologists exacerbates the situation. Their departure affects the well-being of students who require specialized support.
Violence and Communication: Some special needs children express themselves through aggression. Teaching assistants often lack proper training to handle such situations.
Budget Constraints: Schools struggle to provide adequate resources due to insufficient funding. Many end up using their own budgets to support special needs children.

The GMB asserts that these problems extend beyond Leeds and are nationwide. Following the protest, a delegation of parents and union representatives presented their case to Leeds City Council, urging immediate action to address these pressing issues.