Union News 9th of June 2024

Subscribe to the Union News YouTube channel here

1,272 words, 7 minutes read time.

In this week’s Union News, we celebrate a significant victory for Welsh hospital doctors as the British Medical Association (BMA) secures improved pay terms following strike action. Junior doctors, specialist doctors, and consultants will receive substantial pay increases, marking a crucial step towards pay restoration. Meanwhile, the Derby Silk Mill Festival commemorates Britain’s first organized industrial workers’ struggle from 1833-34, reminding us of the enduring legacy of union solidarity and resilience.

Additionally, the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union demands urgent government action to address the UK’s prison overcrowding crisis and prevent staff burnout, highlighting the dire need for investment in the prison service. The National Education Union (NEU) has unveiled a bold manifesto ahead of the General Election, calling for major reforms in education funding, child poverty, exam systems, and teacher recruitment to prioritize children’s well-being and support educators.

Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg.

BMA Secures Improved Pay Offer for Welsh Hospital Doctors After Strike Action

In a significant victory for medical professionals, the British Medical Association (BMA) has successfully negotiated improved pay terms for doctors working in secondary care across Wales. Following two months of intense negotiations and 10 days of strike action, the BMA has secured pay offers that benefit junior doctors, specialist doctors (SAS), and consultants.

Key Points:

Junior Doctors: A 12.4% backdated pay rise for the 2023-24 financial year, with the increase applicable from April 2023.
Consultants: A revised pay scale featuring better starting pay and an additional pay rise of up to 10.1%.
SAS Doctors: New contracts with pay increases ranging from 6.1% to 9.2%, along with an additional uplift for those on closed contracts.

The BMA’s Welsh Junior Doctors Committee co-chairs, Dr. Oba Babs Osibodu and Dr. Peter Fahey, expressed satisfaction with the offer, emphasizing that it sets the stage for pay restoration. Dr. Stephen Kelly, chair of BMA Cymru Wales’ Consultants committee, welcomed the improvements, recognizing the dedication of senior doctors.

However, the Royal College of Nursing Wales criticized the government’s handling of nursing staff salaries. Executive director Helen Whyley highlighted the frustration felt by nursing staff, who continue to wait for fair pay.

Welsh First Minister Vaughan Gething and Health Secretary Eluned Morgan acknowledged the constructive nature of the talks, thanking the BMA’s negotiating teams and NHS Employers.

The BMA remains committed to advocating for fair pay across the healthcare sector, urging ministers to address nursing staff salaries promptly.

“Remember the Past, Fight for Your Future”: Derby’s Historic Silk Mill Struggle Resonates Today

The Derby Silk Mill Festival was held on June 8 2024. This lively event commemorates Britain’s first organized struggle of industrial workers, which took place during 1833-34. The festival includes a march, rally, and a People’s Festival with trade union and community campaign stalls, live bands, and activities for kids.

The annual Festival serves as a poignant reminder of the year-long battle fought by silk mill workers in the Derwent Valley during 1833-34. These workers faced oppressive owners and managers who exploited their labour through spurious pay cuts and denied them trade union rights under the threat of instant dismissal.

The Struggle:

Lockout and Resistance: The silk mill lockout was a bitter and sustained conflict. Workers rallied against unfair treatment, and their struggle is commemorated not only through the festival but also by a mural on the Silk Mill pub, adjacent to the now-transformed Mill (Derby’s Museum of Making).
Union Solidarity: When Mr. Frost, a silk manufacturer, dismissed a worker for refusing a fine related to “shoddy work,” all union members walked out. The bosses responded with a lockout, attempting to break the trade union.
Regional General Strike: The dispute quickly spread to other mills in the Derwent Valley, becoming a Derby-centric general strike. Workers demanded fair treatment and the fruits of their own industry.
Repression and Resilience: Despite repression from ruling classes, including military, police, courts, and more, solidarity persisted. The struggle symbolized a fight for workplace strength.
Legacy: Although workers returned to their jobs in 1834 due to poverty and violence, this pivotal event led to the formation of the Grand National Consolidated Trade Union, shaping today’s trade union movement.

As we remember this historic struggle, let it inspire us to continue fighting for workers’ rights and justice in our own time.

Prison Crisis: PCS Union Demands Urgent Action to Alleviate Overcrowding and Staff Burnout

The Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union has issued a stark call to the new government, urging immediate investment in the UK’s prison service. The goal? To tackle overcrowding and prevent staff burnout.

Key Points:

Staff Pressure: PCS members in Offender Management Units (OMUs) within prisons face immense pressure to take on additional work, all in an effort to free up cell space. Reports indicate that staff are at breaking point, grappling with burnout, stress, and exhaustion.
Unsustainable Conditions: The union emphasizes that the strain on hardworking OMU members is unsustainable and could signal a failure in the HMPPS (Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service) duty of care.
Prison Population Crisis: The UK currently boasts the highest prison population per capita in Western Europe, with numbers projected to reach 106,300 by March 2027. Despite this, successive governments have failed to address the issue adequately.
Private Prisons and Under-Investment: While a multi-million-pound prison building program continues, profit-driven private companies manage it. Simultaneously, the existing public prison infrastructure suffers from sustained under-investment.
Police Cell Rentals: Operation Safeguard involves renting police cells due to overcrowding, and reports suggest that police in England and Wales are advised to make fewer arrests due to cell shortages.
PCS Stands Firm: The PCS supports senior HMPPS leaders who refuse to breach safe operational capacity levels. Overcrowded prisons pose risks to staff, prisoners, and the public.
Parliamentary Action Needed: The Sentencing Bill’s delay necessitates urgent parliamentary attention to sentencing policy, non-custodial alternatives, and broader investment in public services.

PCS General Secretary’s Stance: Fran Heathcote asserts that staff burnout, unsafe conditions, and the impact on work-life balance are unacceptable risks.

As the crisis persists, the PCS remains committed to advocating for change and opposing unsustainable practices in the prison system.

and finally, NEU Unveils Bold Education Manifesto Ahead of General Election

The National Education Union (NEU) has launched a powerful manifesto for education, demanding urgent action from the next government. With ten key policy areas in focus, the NEU aims to reshape the education landscape and prioritize children’s well-being.

Key Proposals:

Reverse Funding Cuts: Schools, colleges, and nurseries must receive increased funding, reaching five percent of GDP.
Tackle Child Poverty: Remove the two-child benefit cap and ensure free, nutritious school lunches for all pupils.
Inclusive Curriculum: Embed anti-racism and provide broad subject access, including arts and PE.
Exam Overhaul: Abandon primary school tests and transform 14-19 assessments to combat the exam factory culture.
Special Needs Support: Swift, bureaucracy-free assistance for students with special needs.
Teacher Recruitment: Competitive pay to fill soaring vacancies.
Ofsted Replacement: Replace Ofsted with a collaborative, supportive system focused on advice and feedback.
Workload Management: Keep educators in the profession by addressing unmanageable workloads.
Professional Development Time: Allocate non-teaching time for collaboration and planning, especially for early career teachers.
Social Media Regulation: Tighter controls to protect children online.

The NEU’s manifesto sets the stage for a critical General Election. The education system faces urgent challenges, from underfunding to child poverty. Teachers and parents understand the impact on learning, and the NEU refuses to accept anything less than serious commitments from major parties. Let education take centre stage!

Picture Credit
Silk Mill Strike PlaqueEamon Curry from Derby, England, CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Unions Sound the Alarm: No Back-pedalling on the New Deal for Workers

591 words, 3 minutes read time. This article first appeared in British Worker, the internal newsletter of Solidarity union.

At the recent union conference in Eastbourne, POA general secretary Steve Gillan delivered a stern message to the Labour Party: There can be no “back-pedalling” on the New Deal for Workers. His warning carries weight, and here’s why:

A Painful History of Broken Promises:

Gillan’s reference to former Labour prime minister Tony Blair’s broken pledge to repeal anti-strike legislation serves as a stark reminder. Unions do not forget easily when promises are left unfulfilled. Workers have endured years of policy shifts, reversals, and disappointments. The New Deal represents hope for positive change, and any deviation from its principles risks repeating past mistakes.

The New Deal for Workers: A Comprehensive Plan

The New Deal for Workers is a comprehensive plan launched by the Labour Party in partnership with affiliated trade unions. Its primary goal is to improve the lives of working people by strengthening individual and collective rights, raising wages, and enhancing working conditions. Here are the key aspects of this transformative initiative:

Strengthening Rights at Work:

From day one on the job, all workers will be entitled to basic rights and protections, including sick pay, holiday pay, parental leave, flexible working arrangements, and protection against unfair dismissal. The qualifying period for these basic rights will be removed, ensuring that everyone is protected from their very first day of employment. Workplace rights and protections will also be strengthened for self-employed individuals, addressing the complexities of legal definitions and rights allocation.

Addressing Insecurity and Low Pay:

The pandemic has highlighted the imbalance of power in the workplace, with wages stagnating for over a decade and work becoming increasingly insecure. In-work poverty and financial insecurity have become rampant, affecting one in six working households. Labour’s New Deal aims to make work more secure, better-paid, and fairer for all, ensuring that workers receive the rights and protections they deserve.

Ending Exploitative Practices:

The New Deal seeks to ban exploitative practices such as zero-hour contracts and “fire and rehire” tactics.

By delivering a genuine living wage and promoting family-friendly work environments, Labour aims to put more money in working people’s pockets, boost economic growth, and enhance conditions for innovation.

Why Is the New Deal Important to Workers?

Security and Dignity:

Strengthening workers’ rights ensures greater job security and stability. When workers have access to basic rights and protections, they can face the future with confidence. The New Deal aims to protect workers from unfair treatment, arbitrary dismissals, and precarious employment situations.

Fair Compensation:

By raising wages and promoting a genuine living wage, the New Deal directly impacts workers’ financial well-being.Fair compensation allows workers to meet their basic needs, support their families, and participate fully in society.

Collective Bargaining Power:

Strengthening unions and collective rights empowers workers to negotiate better terms and conditions with employers. Unions play a crucial role in advocating for workers’ interests, ensuring fair wages, safe working conditions, and a voice in decision-making.

Economic Resilience:

When workers are treated fairly and compensated adequately, they contribute to a more stable and resilient economy. A thriving workforce drives productivity, innovation, and sustainable growth.

The New Deal isn’t just about rhetoric — it’s about meaningful changes that impact people’s lives. Actions speak louder than words, and the Labour Party must deliver on its commitments. Gillan’s call to remember the past and shape the future is a rallying cry. Failed policies have consequences, affecting workers’ livelihoods, families, and communities. The New Deal represents an opportunity to break the cycle of disappointment. It’s a chance to build a fairer, more equitable society—one where workers’ rights are respected and upheld.

Union News 26th of May 2024

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube

1,838 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s episode: Byron Court Primary School Faces Privatisation Battle Amid Harris Federation Controversy, Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers, Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes, Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal, Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer, and finally Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election.

Byron Court Primary School Faces Privatisation Battle Amid Harris Federation Controversy

Byron Court Primary School in North London is at the centre of a heated battle over privatisation plans. The community school, located in Brent, north London, is set to join the notorious Harris Federation academy chain, a move that has sparked outrage among teachers, parents, and local residents.

The controversy began after Ofsted inspectors downgraded Byron Court from an “outstanding” rating to “inadequate” last November. The inspection report highlighted issues of bullying, racist language, and sexual harassment within the school. Parents lost confidence in the institution, and head teacher Martyn Boxall resigned in response to the damning findings.

Acting head Richard Sternberg, who was leading the school during the inspection, assured parents that efforts were underway to address the school’s challenges. However, the Department for Education (DfE) issued an academy order, mandating that Byron Court become part of the Harris Federation—a multi-academy trust known for its involvement in improving educational standards across London and Essex.

The Harris Federation operates 54 primary and secondary schools, directly funded by the DfE and independent of local authority control. Despite the controversy, the federation aims to transform Byron Court through its expertise and resources.

Teachers at Byron Court have taken a stand against the privatisation move. Members of the National Education Union (NEU) went on strike, with further strikes planned for June 4 to 6. NEU national executive member Jenny Cooper emphasized that the union would not accept the politicized privatisation of schools.

A veteran teacher in Brent expressed concerns about the Ofsted inspection process. According to her, the inspectors were rude, altered the inspection timetable, and denied staff necessary support. The inspection outcome, she argued, unfairly smeared the school staff and served as a tool for academisation.

The attempted academisation, however, has faced resistance. The strikes by Byron Court staff have disrupted the Harris Federation’s plans. The teacher hopes that the collective effort will deter the federation from proceeding.

A joint statement from Brent NEU and the Save Byron Court Parent Campaign revealed that nearly two-thirds of parents want the school to remain a community institution. Staff members share this sentiment, yet they find themselves excluded from discussions about the school’s future. The question remains: How can decisions affecting the staff, families, and local community be made without their input

Retail Sales Take a Drenching: Heavy Rain and Cost Pressures Hit Shoppers

Retail sales in the UK took a nosedive last month, leaving shop owners and economists concerned. The culprit? A combination of relentless rain and mounting cost-of-living pressures.

Across all sectors, sales plummeted by 2.3 per cent. But certain categories felt the brunt of the storm: clothing, sports equipment, furniture, and games and toys. These segments were particularly affected by the inclement weather during April.

Clothing and household stores bore the brunt of the decline, experiencing a sharp 4.1 per cent drop—the most significant fall since January 2021. Meanwhile, fashion and footwear retailers alone saw sales dip by 5.1 per cent month on month.

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak emphasized the importance of local spending to stimulate growth and support businesses. He stated, “A sustainable recovery hinges on people’s ability to spend in their local economies.”

However, the retail slump underscores ongoing challenges for families grappling with the cost-of-living crisis. Millions are tightening their belts, and household budgets remain under immense strain.

Despite claims of success from the Conservative government, real wages still lag behind pre-2008 levels. The British public remains skeptical, well aware that bills continue to rise.

An Office for National Statistics survey revealed that 55 per cent of adults reported increased living costs over the past month. Food prices topped the list (cited by 94 per cent), followed by fuel (61 per cent), and energy bills (53 per cent).

Scotland Council Workers Reject “Derisory” Pay Offer, Threaten Summer Strikes

Council workers in Scotland are gearing up for a potential summer strike after unanimously rejecting what they deem a “derisory” pay offer. Unite, the union representing these workers, dismissed the proposal put forth by local government body Cosla.

The contentious 18-month deal would have provided council staff with a 2.2% increase from April this year, followed by an additional 2% hike in October. However, Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, emphasized that their members deserve better and should not settle for less.

Graham McNab, Unite’s industrial officer, echoed this sentiment, stating that the pay offer falls far short of meeting the aspirations of local government workers. Unite also opposes the shift of the pay anniversary date to October, viewing it as a mere delay tactic.

Cosla, on the other hand, maintains that their offer is “strong, fair, and credible.” They argue that severe financial constraints faced by councils necessitate a cautious approach to affordability in the context of a flat-cash local government settlement.

As tensions rise, Unison—the largest local government union in Scotland—has also recommended that staff vote against the pay deal. Meanwhile, GMB Scotland’s local government committee rejected the offer, and their members have already backed strike action in a consultative ballot. A formal ballot for care workers is currently underway

Fire Brigades Union Vows to Hold Labour Accountable on Anti-Strike Law Repeal

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) is turning up the heat on Labour, demanding the scrapping of the Tories’ controversial minimum service levels legislation. FBU President Ian Murray made this commitment during his opening address at the union’s annual conference in Blackpool.

Murray, a veteran of such gatherings for over two decades, expressed frustration with the state of fire and rescue services. He cited resolutions and policy statements that consistently highlighted the sector’s decline, fragmentation, and inadequate infrastructure investment.

“We’re fighting year after year for the meagre remains on the Treasury table,” Murray declared. “It’s not even enough to maintain the status quo. We need change, and hopefully, a general election will deliver it.”

The FBU’s focus centres on Labour’s promise to repeal the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act within 100 days if the party secures victory in the upcoming general election. This legislation currently mandates fire and rescue services to operate at 73% capacity during strikes, while control rooms continue normal operations despite industrial action.

Education Unions Demand Immediate Publication of STRB Report and Pay Offer

The National Education Union (NEU), NASUWT, NAHT, and ASCL school leaders’ union have joined forces to call for urgent action from Education Secretary Gillian Keegan. In a joint letter, they demand the immediate release of the School Teachers’ Review Body’s (STRB) recommendations and the government’s response.

Their key demand? A “fully-funded, above-inflation pay increase for all teachers and school leaders in September 2024.” Anything less, they argue, would be a dereliction of the government’s duty to safeguard the education service. The unions warn that any continued failure to invest adequately will exact a heavy political toll at the upcoming general election.

The STRB, an independent advisory body, provides recommendations on teachers’ and school leaders’ pay and conditions in England. Last week, the latest STRB Report landed on Keegan’s desk. The unions insist that its findings must be made public without delay.

In a pointed reference to Keegan’s previous commitment to align the STRB process with the school budget cycle, the unions emphasize the urgency of publishing the report. They highlight the critical recruitment and retention challenges faced by the education sector. Delaying the report’s release could exacerbate these problems, leading to more teachers and school leaders considering leaving the profession.

Research from the NFER and the House of Commons Education Committee underscores the severity of the recruitment and retention crisis. Teaching’s competitive position has suffered due to pay cuts worse than those in other professions. Skyrocketing workloads compound the challenges. Evidence supports the case for higher teacher pay increases relative to the wider economy to address teacher supply issues.

Moreover, schools have grappled with resource constraints since 2010, with 70% experiencing real-terms funding reductions due to government cuts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that an additional £3.2 billion is needed to restore school spending power to pre-2010 levels.

The unions urge the government to prioritize education investment. Their first demand: a fully funded, above-inflation pay rise for educators in September 2024. Failure to meet this crucial step would jeopardize the education service’s future.

Parents, teachers, and school leaders await Keegan’s response. The stakes are high—the government’s actions will resonate at the General Election.

and finally, Workers Party and Independent Left Candidates: A Powerful Alternative in the 2024 General Election

As the 2024 general election approaches, voters across the United Kingdom are faced with critical decisions. Amidst the familiar political landscape dominated by the old gang parties, a new force is emerging: the Workers Party of Britain. Led by the charismatic George Galloway, this party aims to challenge the status quo and provide a fresh alternative for disillusioned voters.

Why Consider the Workers Party?

The Workers Party’s rallying cry is stalwart support for the Palestinian people and opposition to British complicity in the Gaza genocide1. While this issue remains central, the party also addresses a wide range of concerns, from healthcare (NHS) to the economy, crime, and immigration. The economic policies of the Party are pro-union and pro-worker.

The Workers Party plans to contest almost every English seat in the upcoming election, making it the largest left-of-Labour electoral challenge in history. Their goal is to have the same impact on Labour as Nigel Farage’s Reform Party had on the Tories. With over 500 candidates already in place, they’re poised to shake up the political landscape.

Independent Left Candidates: The Workers Party supports a select group of independent left-leaning candidates. Among them are Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader, who will stand as an independent in Islington North, and Andrew Feinstein, chosen by the Organise Corbyn-Inspired Socialist Alliance (OCISA) to unseat Keir Starmer in Holborn and St Pancras. These candidates offer an alternative to the mainstream parties.

As the election draws near, voters must seriously consider their options. The Workers Party, with its principled stance, and independent candidates, offer a compelling alternative. Whether you’re disillusioned with the major parties or seeking a new vision for Britain, the Workers Party and Independent left candidates deserve your attention. Remember, the ballot box is one way to achieve change, and this election presents an opportunity to shape the future of our nation.

Workers Party of Great Britain Logo
By https://workerspartybritain.org/, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=68206749

Union News 21st of May 2024

Subscribe to Union News here

1,518 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News for the 21st of May 2024. In this week’s edition: Labour Leader Faces Union Backlash Over Workers’ Rights Revisions, Historic Win for Workers: Lord Woodley’s Anti-Fire and Rehire Bill Passes Unopposed, Scottish Lecturers Strike for Fair Pay Amidst Cost-of-Living Crisis, and finally, Apprenticeship Levy Backfires, Undermining Training Schemes, Report Warns Government’s Apprenticeship Levy Faces Criticism for Harming Training Programs. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg.

Labour Leader Faces Union Backlash Over Workers’ Rights Revisions
Starmer Scrambles to Mend Ties with Unions Amid Workers’ Rights Tensions

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is working to reassure trade union leaders about his party’s commitment to workers’ rights following accusations of diluting key policies.

Labour’s ambitious plan, heralded as the most significant workers’ rights overhaul in decades, promises to ban zero hours contracts, ensure employment rights from day one, and end “fire and rehire” practices. Initially introduced by Deputy Leader Angela Rayner in 2021, the plan has faced scrutiny and revisions, raising concerns among union leaders.

Union leaders were alarmed by a new document, circulated last week, which they viewed as a retreat from the original commitments. Unite’s General Secretary, Sharon Graham, branded the document a “betrayal” and “unrecognizable” from the initial plan.

In a bid to address these concerns, Starmer, along with Rayner and Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves, met with trade union officials. Following intense discussions, the controversial draft was scrapped.

In a joint statement, Labour and union leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the “new deal for working people,” as agreed last July. They pledged to work swiftly on legislative plans to bring these commitments into action should Labour win the next election.

Despite the recent agreement, tensions remain high. Union sources suggest that Labour’s leadership might be succumbing to pressure from business interests as the election approaches.

After the meeting, Graham expressed cautious optimism, stating that Labour had recommitted to the New Deal for Working People. She emphasized the importance of workers’ voices in the ongoing discussions, noting another meeting is scheduled in three weeks to finalize details.

Labour’s plans originally included introducing an “employment rights bill” within 100 days of taking office, though this timeline is now considered ambitious. Changes to the policy last summer at the national policy forum had already sparked union discontent, seen as attempts to appease business interests.

Recent reports suggested the new draft was more lenient towards business needs, especially regarding fire and rehire practices and zero hours contracts. The Financial Times indicated the draft included language allowing businesses to restructure for viability and offered limited bans on zero hours contracts.

Labour has also faced criticism for scaling back its 2021 green energy investment plans from £28bn, highlighting ongoing internal party struggles to balance progressive policies with electoral pragmatism.

Union leaders remain vigilant, determined to ensure Labour’s more radical policies do not face further dilution. As the election campaign heats up, Starmer and his team must navigate these tensions to maintain crucial union support.

Historic Win for Workers: Lord Woodley’s Anti-Fire and Rehire Bill Passes Unopposed
House of Lords Backs Landmark Legislation to Protect Workers’ Rights

In a significant victory for workers’ rights, Lord Tony Woodley’s Employment and Trade Union Rights (Dismissal and Re-engagement) Bill passed unopposed at its third reading in the House of Lords on Friday. This pivotal legislation aims to protect employees from dismissal and re-engagement under inferior terms, mandating employers to conduct thorough consultations and disclose relevant information regarding any contract changes.

Lord Woodley, former general secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union (T&G) and joint general secretary of Unite, passionately addressed the Lords, condemning the exploitative practice of “fire and rehire.”

“Fire and rehire is a despicable tactic used by unscrupulous employers to rip off workers, cut costs, and boost profits,” Woodley stated. “I am thrilled to see this Bill progress in the House and grateful for the cross-party support it has received. This legislation marks a significant step towards eradicating this abusive practice.”

Woodley expressed gratitude to various individuals and organizations for their contributions to the Bill’s success. He acknowledged Unite for exposing the misuse of fire and rehire during the Covid-19 pandemic and Barry Gardiner, who championed a similar Private Member’s Bill in the Commons.

The Bill, crafted with the expertise of Lord Hendy and Professor Keith Ewing from the Institute of Employment Rights, also received robust backing from over 20 trade unions across the UK. Woodley emphasized the Labour Party’s commitment to combating exploitative employment practices as a key promise for the next election.

As the Bill moves to the Commons, it is expected to be championed by Labour MP Barry Gardiner, who anticipates strong opposition from the government. Gardiner, celebrating the Bill’s progress, shared on social media, “Great job Tony for taking the Stop Fire & Rehire Bill to the next stage. It’ll be an honour to pick up from where we left off in the Commons almost two years ago. The tragedy is that in the months in between, the government has done nothing. The next Labour government must and will.”

This legislative milestone brings the UK closer to eliminating the exploitative fire and rehire practice, ensuring fair treatment for workers and holding employers accountable.

Scottish Lecturers Strike for Fair Pay Amidst Cost-of-Living Crisis

Lecturers from colleges across Scotland have commenced a series of strikes today, expressing profound dissatisfaction over unresolved wage disputes. The Educational Institute of Scotland Further Education Lecturer Association (EIS-FELA) initiated the first of nine planned strike days spanning May and June, following unfruitful negotiations that have been ongoing since 2022.

In an effort to break the impasse, EIS-FELA presented a revised four-year pay proposal last Thursday. However, the response from employers fell short of the union’s expectations, leaving no choice but to proceed with the strike action this week.

A spokesperson for EIS expressed their disappointment, stating, “Despite presenting a revised pay claim to College Employers Scotland (CES), we received no guarantees on key aspects of the pay increase or other elements of the claim.”

The lecturing staff’s commitment to their students remains unwavering, as they yearn to return to their teaching duties and assist students in achieving their academic goals. Nevertheless, they stand united in their quest for a fair pay rise, which they believe is essential to mitigate the financial strain and stress inflicted by the current cost-of-living crisis.

Gavin Donoghue, the director of CES, has declared the offer of a £5,000 consolidated pay increase over three academic years, starting from September 2022, as the “full and final” proposal. He urges EIS-FELA to halt the escalation of strike actions and to conduct a formal ballot among their members regarding the offer.

and finally, Apprenticeship Levy Backfires, Undermining Training Schemes, Report Warns
Government’s Apprenticeship Levy Faces Criticism for Harming Training Programs

The government’s Apprenticeship Levy, introduced to boost trainee employment, is backfiring and undermining apprentice training schemes, a new report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and the Youth Futures Foundation warned today.

The report highlights that the scheme incentivizes employers to “rebadge” existing staff training as apprenticeships to claim funding, rather than genuinely investing in new trainees. A survey of over 2,000 organizations revealed these “worrying unintended consequences,” with many employers repurposing existing training programs to draw from the levy fund.

Introduced in 2017, the Apprenticeship Levy requires employers with a pay bill of £3 million or more to pay a 0.5% tax. This money goes into a fund that employers can use to finance apprenticeship programs. However, the report indicates this system is eroding traditional apprenticeship pathways.

Peter Cheese, chief executive of CIPD, emphasized the detrimental impact on young people: “The evidence in this report shows clearly that young people most need and benefit from apprenticeships, and that the erosion of this pathway has had a negative impact on social mobility for the most disadvantaged.”

Cheese called for “an apprenticeship guarantee” to reclaim apprenticeships for young people and reverse the decline in opportunities for them.

Barry Fletcher, chief executive of the Youth Futures Foundation, added, “International evidence shows apprenticeships are an important and impactful way to support young people in preparing for and accessing jobs. Yet, apprenticeship participation has fallen significantly for young people, especially those most marginalized in recent years.”

The Trade Union Congress (TUC) also called for reforms to the scheme. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak stated, “Funds raised by the apprenticeship levy are being underspent or misused. Every worker should have the chance to raise their skills, progress their career, and improve their situation. The scheme needs reform to allow more flexibility so that it benefits more workers, has greater quality control, and targets those who need it most.”

Nowak concluded, “Training pays for itself. Revitalizing our skills system should be a core part of a new UK industrial strategy. That’s how we can get the economy growing again so that we are all better off.”

As criticisms mount, it is clear that the Apprenticeship Levy, while well-intentioned, requires significant changes to effectively support the development of the UK’s workforce.

Keir Starmer picture
By Chris McAndrew – https://api20170418155059.azure-api.net/photo/X9dwBvuR.jpeg?crop=MCU_3:4&quality=80&download=trueGallery: https://beta.parliament.uk/media/X9dwBvuR, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=61331023

Union News 14th of May 2024

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,969 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News This week: Government Benefit Overhaul Sparks Criticism from Campaigners, WASPI Women Await Compensation: Prime Minister Faces Tough Questions, Teachers ‘Morally Blackmailed’ into Excessive Workloads, Union Warns, High Court Greenlights Challenge to Government’s Anti-Strike Laws, Firefighters Urged to Refrain from Assisting Police in Removing Pro-Palestine Protesters, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy, and finally, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is from Tim Bragg.

Government Benefit Overhaul Sparks Criticism from Campaigners

Campaigners are voicing sharp criticism against the government’s recent benefit overhaul, arguing that it pushes single mothers and others on razor-thin margins deeper into financial instability.

Under the new rules implemented today, universal credit claimants earning less than £892 will be required to search for additional or higher-paying work. Failure to meet these expectations could result in the loss of benefits altogether.

The threshold has notably increased from £617 for individuals and £988 for couples. Now, individuals are expected to earn at least £1,437, a significant jump.

This means that individuals working less than 18 hours a week on minimum wage will now have to actively seek more employment opportunities. Additionally, those working less than half of a full-time week will face more frequent meetings with their work coach to boost earnings or risk penalties.

The Department for Work and Pensions estimates that around 180,000 people will be affected by these changes.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak defended the reforms, stating that “welfare should always be a safety net and not a lifestyle choice.” He believes the changes will help more people on universal credit transition into well-paid jobs and achieve financial independence.

However, Michael Clarke, head of information programmes at anti-poverty charity Turn2us, disagrees. Clarke argues that the threshold rises severely challenge those juggling jobs with irregular or fluctuating incomes and balancing responsibilities like childcare.

“For single mothers and others on razor-thin margins, these adjustments risk tipping them into crisis, exacerbating financial insecurity and mental stress as they struggle to meet the new demands,” Clarke stated.

He emphasized the importance of a support system that truly aids those in need rather than penalizing them.

These reforms come in the wake of other welfare changes announced by Mr. Sunak last month, including a review into Personal Independent Payment (PIP), a non means-tested benefit aiding individuals with extra costs due to long-term disability or ill health.

Sunak pledged to reduce the number of those with mental health conditions claiming PIP and introduce a more “rigorous” approach, sparking criticism from campaigners who accuse him of launching a “full-on assault” on disabled people.

WASPI Women Await Compensation: Prime Minister Faces Tough Questions

During this week’s Prime Minister’s Questions session, SNP MP Chris Law directed a pointed query to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak regarding the much-anticipated compensation for WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) women. Law pressed, “Can the Prime Minister finally set out when the WASPI women will receive the compensation they rightly deserve?”

The discussion referenced a motion passed by the Scottish Government advocating for “compensation in full” for the 3.8 million affected women. Responding to the inquiry, Sunak acknowledged the gravity of the issue, stating, “I understand the strong feelings across the Chamber on this topic, and the desire for urgency in addressing them.” He emphasized the need to meticulously review the comprehensive findings of the ombudsman’s five-year investigation before providing an update to the House.

The awaited report from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO), released in March, recommended payments ranging from £1,000 to £2,950, urging Parliament to take decisive action on the matter. Echoing sentiments from various MPs, who have advocated for larger payouts, the Prime Minister highlighted the government’s commitment to ensuring pensioners’ dignity and security in retirement, citing recent increases to the state pension.

Members of the PHSO, appearing before a parliamentary committee, suggested that some WASPI women might merit payments exceeding the recommended levels outlined in the report. Interim PHSO ombudsman Rebecca Hilsenrath acknowledged the possibility of direct financial loss for certain individuals beyond those included in the sample cases studied.

WASPI chair Angle Madden reiterated the urgency of the matter, underscoring the financial hardships faced by many women as a result of delayed pensions. Madden emphasized the significant impact on those who had sacrificed full-time employment to care for loved ones, asserting the tangible financial consequences of such decisions.

As pressure mounts and expectations heighten, the quest for equitable compensation for WASPI women remains at the forefront of political discourse, underscoring the need for swift and substantive action to address this longstanding injustice.

Teachers ‘Morally Blackmailed’ into Excessive Workloads, Union Warns

Amid mounting concerns over the working conditions of teachers in Scotland, the Scottish Secondary Teachers Association (SSTA) has sounded the alarm, accusing educators of being “morally blackmailed” into accepting unsustainable levels of unpaid work.

Addressing delegates at the SSTA’s annual conference, union president Stuart Hunter highlighted the pervasive culture of excessive workloads, attributing it to a sense of obligation driven by the belief that additional tasks are necessary “for the sake of the kids.” Hunter lamented the toll this phenomenon takes on teachers’ mental health and called for an end to the cycle of emotional manipulation.

In the backdrop of Glasgow’s decision to slash 450 teaching positions over the next three years, Hunter criticized the lack of support for educators, noting the absence of vital roles such as social workers and educational psychologists. He denounced budget cuts as a political tactic, accusing authorities of prioritizing austerity measures over the well-being of teachers and students.

Meanwhile, the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT), hosting its own conference, highlighted the escalating crisis of violence and abuse faced by teachers in schools. NASUWT’s Scotland official, Mike Corbett, emphasized the urgent need for measures to address the effects of this alarming trend, citing recent incidents of weapon attacks on school premises.

Teachers’ safety concerns have been met with calls for immediate action from the Scottish government. While acknowledging the need for enhanced well-being support for school staff, officials stated that over £2 million has been allocated since October 2020 to address these issues.

As teachers and unions continue to raise the alarm on unsustainable workloads and safety risks in schools, pressure mounts on authorities to prioritize the welfare of educators and students alike in Scotland’s education system.

High Court Greenlights Challenge to Government’s Anti-Strike Laws

In a significant legal development, the High Court has granted permission for a judicial review of the government’s controversial Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023, a move hailed as a victory for workers’ rights.

Civil Service union PCS will spearhead the challenge against the legislation, which grants employers in specific sectors unprecedented powers to enforce minimum service levels during strike actions, effectively compelling workers to undermine their own protests or risk dismissal.

Both PCS and the Trades Union Congress (TUC) welcomed the court’s decision, viewing it as a crucial step in combating what they perceive as an assault on trade union freedoms.

PCS General Secretary Fran Heathcote condemned the government’s attempt to curtail workers’ right to strike, highlighting the effectiveness of previous strike actions undertaken by PCS members in securing concessions. Heathcote vowed to resist any erosion of workers’ rights and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to challenge the legislation through legal avenues.

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak echoed these sentiments, characterizing the Strikes Act as a regressive measure that undermines the fundamental right to strike. He criticized the government’s persistence in pushing through these reforms despite warnings about their potential unlawfulness and detrimental impact on industrial relations.

This legal setback for the government comes on the heels of private rail operators’ refusal to enforce minimum service regulations on striking train drivers represented by the union Aslef. The defiance of these regulations underscores the deep-seated resistance among workers to what they perceive as unjust constraints on their ability to collectively bargain and protest.

As the legal challenge gains momentum, workers and unions remain steadfast in their commitment to safeguarding the right to strike and challenging legislative measures that impede their ability to advocate for fair wages and working conditions.

Firefighters Urged to Refrain from Assisting Police in Removing Pro-Palestine Protesters

In a show of solidarity with the pro-Palestine movement, the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has issued a directive to its 32,000 members, urging them not to aid police in evicting protesters engaging in rooftop occupations of British factories manufacturing weapons for Israel.

The call to action comes in response to an incident in Leicester where firefighters from the Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service were summoned by police to address an occupation staged by supporters of the direct action group Palestine Action at the Israeli-owned Elbit Tactical Systems factory.

During the operation, firefighters were observed using an aerial appliance to remove a protester from the occupied building, sparking controversy over their involvement in what some perceive as a law enforcement activity.

In a message to firefighters following the incident, FBU General Secretary Matt Wrack underscored the primary role of firefighters in saving lives and protecting communities, emphasizing that there is no justification for their involvement in the removal of protesters. Wrack reiterated the union’s stance in supporting the rights of protesters and advocating for peace and justice in Gaza.

The FBU’s directive advises members to refrain from participating in law enforcement activities alongside the police, particularly in situations involving the removal of protesters. This stance aligns with previous instances where firefighters have declined police requests for assistance during rooftop occupations of arms factories targeted by campaigners.

John Nicholson of Greater Manchester Friends of Palestine recalled an occasion when firefighters, upon being informed of the FBU’s policy on Palestine, opted not to assist police in removing protesters during an occupation at an Elbit UK factory in Oldham.

As tensions escalate in the region, pro-Palestine protests are expected to continue across Britain this weekend, highlighting ongoing international concerns over Israel’s military actions in Gaza and the plight of Palestinians seeking refuge amidst the conflict.

and finally, BrewDog Founder James Watt Steps Down as CEO Amid Controversy

James Watt, co-founder of the Scottish brewery and pub group BrewDog, has announced his decision to transition to the newly-created role of “captain and co-founder,” retaining his shares in the company. This move will see Chief Operating Officer James Arrow assume the position of CEO, marking a significant shift in leadership for the company.

Established in Fraserburgh, Aberdeenshire, in 2007 by Watt and Martin Dickie, BrewDog has grown to encompass breweries and pubs worldwide, while maintaining its headquarters in Ellon, Aberdeenshire. Reflecting on his tenure as CEO, Watt expressed gratitude for the journey of the past 17 years, acknowledging the highs and lows experienced during his time at the helm.

However, Watt’s leadership has been marred by controversy in recent years, with BrewDog facing criticism over its marketing campaigns and workplace culture. Former employees publicly accused the company of fostering a “culture of fear” and “toxic attitudes” towards junior staff in an open letter in 2021. Furthermore, BrewDog drew ire earlier this year for its decision to abandon its commitment to the real living wage in favour of the minimum wage for new hires.

The announcement of Watt’s departure has been met with celebration by members of Unite, the union representing workers across BrewDog. Bryan Simpson, lead organiser for the hospitality sector at Unite, criticized Watt for presiding over a culture of bullying and mistreatment within the company. Simpson emphasized the need for BrewDog to address the concerns raised by workers and urged the company to prioritize improving pay and conditions in collaboration with the union.

As BrewDog undergoes this transition in leadership, it faces the challenge of rebuilding trust and addressing longstanding issues to foster a more positive and inclusive workplace environment for its employees.

Pension image:
Image by Frantisek Krejci from Pixabay
Brewdog
By https://www.facebook.com/brewdogofficial/?brand_redir=365381716870623, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69878398

Tata Steel Workers Vote for Industrial Action Amid Threat of Blast Furnace Closure

Port Talbot works

507 words, 3 minutes read time.

Tata Steel workers in Port Talbot, members of the Unite union, have taken a significant step by voting for industrial action. The dispute centres around Tata’s plans to replace blast furnaces with electric arc furnaces (EAFs), a move that could result in the loss of thousands of jobs.

Tata Steel, an Indian-owned company, aims to close blast furnaces in Port Talbot and Llanwern. The proposed shift to EAFs would lead to the loss of 2,500 jobs in Port Talbot and 300 jobs in Llanwern. Port Talbot steelworkers have campaigned for an integrated electric and blast furnace system throughout 2023, but this marks the first strike in over 40 years.

Unite Wales regional secretary, Peter Hughes, condemns Tata’s actions as “devastating industrial vandalism”. Tata allegedly used tactics such as bribes and threats to discourage members from taking industrial action. Unite remains resolute, emphasizing the impact on the Welsh economy and the UK’s national interest.

EAFs vs. Blast Furnaces

EAFs produce steel from scrap, not the quality virgin steel derived from raw materials that industries like rail, aerospace, and automotive sectors require. Blast furnaces, fuelled by coal and coke, provide the essential raw material for these critical industries. Pat Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union says:

“The shift to EAFs poses a threat to Britain’s industrial sovereignty, especially as steel demand is expected to rise significantly in the coming years. Tata is guilty of hypocrisy regarding emissions. While cutting British jobs, the company is simultaneously opening new blast furnaces in India.
Their motives appear profit-driven rather than environmentally conscious.“

“The closure of blast furnaces in Port Talbot, along with similar proposals at the Chinese-owned British Steel plant in Scunthorpe, would leave the UK as the only G20 economy without the ability to make steel from scratch,”

Tata has questioned the regularity of Unite’s strike ballot, but this has not deterred fellow union members. Members of Community, who work in blast furnaces, will hold their own strike ballot. They accuse Tata of pursuing “decarbonization on the cheap”. The untested nature of EAFs raises concerns, as closure of all blast furnaces could lead to a 3-year production pause. Semi-finished steel slabs may need to be imported before EAFs become operational in 2027.

A Unite petition, signed by 30,000 people, calls for greater support for steel and the use of UK steel in domestic projects. Corby, once home to Europe’s largest integrated steel-making plant, has seen a decline in steel employment since the 1970s and 1980s. Meanwhile, British Steel (Chinese-owned) secures a contract to supply rail tracks for Egypt’s electrified mainline and freight network.

British Steel plans to demolish its blast furnaces, with EAFs operational only by late 2025. The Scunthorpe-based company’s contract for Egypt’s rail route highlights the stakes for the UK steel industry. In summary, the battle over steel production and jobs continues, with workers and unions standing up against Tata’s plans. The outcome will shape the future of Britain’s steel industry and its role in global markets.

Picture credit: By Chris Shaw, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=9173765

Workers Memorial Day 2024

412 words, 2 minutes read time.

David Carpenter, a dedicated refuse collector, met a tragic fate in Coventry. On January 19, 2023, while on his morning collection round in the Foleshill area, he was operating alongside his colleagues, driver Rafal Gancarz and fellow operative Sean Isherwood. David had been a binman since the age of 18, accumulating over 40 years of experience in this crucial yet often overlooked role.

The events leading to his untimely demise unfolded as follows: David’s coat became entangled in the lifting equipment of the bin lorry. In a horrifying turn of events, he was dropped into the back of the lorry just as the automatic compaction cycle began. The jury, after careful consideration, deemed this accident as foreseeable. They highlighted several critical points:

Safety Measures: Evidence indicated that additional mechanical and safety features could have made the refuse collection vehicle (RCV) safer. Unfortunately, a transparent screen likely impeded David’s access to an emergency stop button, leading him to believe that the vehicle’s rear was safe to enter.
Risk Assessment: The risk of a person’s clothing becoming entangled was foreseeable, and the jury found the existing risk assessment inadequate and incomplete.
Training Gap: There was no specific training for refuse workers on how to safely remove debris from the machinery.
Underreporting Culture: A culture of underreporting incidents and near misses contributed to missed opportunities to keep David safe.

David Carpenter was more than just a binman; he was a warm, humble, and loving family man. His stepdaughter, Claire Chetwynd, emphasized that health and safety should never be taken for granted. She stated, “Health and Safety is not a luxury; it is essential to preserving the lives of every worker, especially those who perform these essential roles.” The family hopes that David’s legacy will prevent similar tragedies in the future.

The company responsible for the software on the truck, Dennis Eagle Ltd, upgraded all 52 bin lorries in Coventry with new software at a cost of £650 per lorry. However, campaigners highlight that similar lorries around the country have yet to be upgraded, raising concerns about safety and accessibility.

Ros Wynne Jones, the Daily Mirror’s Senior Feature Writer, penned a moving piece about David this Thursday in her campaigning ‘Real Britain’ column.

May his memory serve as a reminder to prioritize safety and protect those who tirelessly contribute to our communities. Let us remember him and all others who have lost their lives at work—135 in the past 12 months—today, Workers Memorial Day.

Union News, Saturday, 26 April, 2024

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,576 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reporting is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Labour’s Bold Move: Extending Public Ownership of UK Railways Faces Scrutiny, Cleaners Threaten Industrial Action Over Real Living Wage at Royal Mail, International Workers Memorial Day 2024: Honouring Lives Lost and Advocating for Safety, Nurses in England Face Intense Stress: A Disturbing Trend, and finally, £116 sick pay ‘failing those with cancer’.

Labour’s Bold Move: Extending Public Ownership of UK Railways Faces Scrutiny

In a significant development, the Labour Party has reaffirmed its commitment to expanding public ownership of Britain’s railway network. The proposal, led by Shadow Transport Secretary Louise Haigh, aims to bring train operating franchises back under public control as their current contracts expire. Here are the key points:

Despite pressure from Labour’s pro-business faction, Haigh has stood firm, resisting any dilution or abandonment of the plan. This move represents a rare instance where Labour leader Keir Starmer has not cynically abandoned election promises made in 2020.

Taking franchises back into public hands is expected to benefit passengers significantly. Integration of services and simplified ticketing are long-standing issues that the privatized industry has repeatedly promised to address but failed to deliver.

Ending payments to private shareholders will allow better investment in the rail network. This move is a departure from the system introduced by former Prime Minister John Major, which allowed private companies to profit from rail operations.

While this step is considered radical by some, it is essential. Even under Conservative governments, four train operating franchises are currently state-run due to private operators’ failures.

Network Rail, responsible for infrastructure, is already publicly owned. The government’s proposal to establish Great British Railways aims to direct the entire industry, albeit with a continued role for private capital.

Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves would not allow rail privatization to cost the Exchequer a penny. Her stance underscores the financial considerations behind Labour’s plans.

And there are gaps in Labour’s strategy. The rolling stock companies (Roscos), which own the trains themselves, will remain in private hands.

As the debate unfolds, the nation watches closely. Will the vision for a publicly owned railway system become a reality? Only time will tell.

Cleaners Threaten Industrial Action Over Real Living Wage at Royal Mail

In a tense standoff, cleaners employed by Royal Mail’s facilities management arm are threatening industrial action if the company abandons the Real Living Wage commitment. Here are the key details:

Members of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) have vowed to resist any attempt by Royal Mail Property and Facilities Solutions (RMPFS) to backtrack on the voluntary agreement. This move comes after a number of employers, including Capita, have already shifted away from paying the Real Living Wage.

Delegates at the CWU’s annual conference in Bournemouth approved this approach. The motion, discussed in private, expresses concern about the trend away from fair wages.

The CWU has made strides by using the voluntary agreement to ensure that its lowest-paid members receive at least £12 per hour. This includes cleaners working across RMPFS’s extensive network of over 2,600 sites, making it one of Europe’s largest corporate real estates.
Ongoing Talks: While pay negotiations with RMPFS continue, the CWU remains steadfast. If RMPFS signals an intention to withdraw from paying the Real Living Wage to cleaning staff, the union will resist vigorously.

Royal Mail’s Owner: International Distribution Services (IDS), which owns Royal Mail, has yet to comment on the situation.

This is part of a wider trend. Capita, a major outsourcing company, recently joined Brewdog in abandoning the commitment to the Real Living Wage. Their rationale cites affordability concerns.

Fearing a domino effect, unions suspect that more companies may follow suit. In January, the CWU expressed strong disapproval of this “disgraceful decision” that could significantly impact workers’ livelihoods.

As the battle over fair wages unfolds, the eyes of workers and employers alike remain fixed on the outcome.

International Workers Memorial Day 2024: Honouring Lives Lost and Advocating for Safety

On April 28, 2024, the world observes International Workers Memorial Day (IWMD) —a solemn occasion to remember workers who paid the ultimate price while striving to earn a living. These are the individuals who left for work one day and never returned, leaving behind grieving families and communities.

IWMD unites the global trade union movement in a collective act of remembrance. It serves as a stark reminder that more people lose their lives at work than in wars. These aren’t mere statistics; they represent real individuals—mothers, fathers, siblings, and friends—who faced preventable tragedies due to workplace hazards.

Beyond remembrance, IWMD is a call to action. It demands that we fight for the living—to ensure that every worker returns home safely at the end of their shift. As we honor those we’ve lost, we also advocate for robust safety measures, fair wages, and dignified working conditions.

This year’s theme underscores the intersection of environmental challenges and workers’ well-being. As the climate crisis intensifies, workers face increased risks—from extreme weather events to exposure to hazardous substances. IWMD prompts us to address these issues collectively, recognizing that a healthy planet is inseparable from healthy workers.

Throughout history, employer and government failures have led to preventable worker deaths. Trade unions have fought tirelessly for legislative changes to protect safety rights. On this IWMD, we reflect on these pivotal moments and recommit ourselves to safeguarding workers’ lives.

As the sun rises on April 28, 2024, let us remember the fallen, honor their memory, and stand up for the living. Whether you’re a union member, an advocate, or an ordinary citizen, your voice matters. Together, we can create workplaces where safety is paramount and lives are valued.

Nurses in England Face Intense Stress: A Disturbing Trend

In a concerning revelation, nurses in England have been grappling with unbearable stress, leading to significant time off work. Here are the key findings:

During 2023, nurses and health visitors took a staggering 1,675,275 days off sick due to stress, anxiety, or depression. This alarming figure highlights the immense strain faced by nursing staff.

On average, each of England’s 352,125 nurses and health visitors missed approximately 4.95 days of work due to stress-related conditions. These intense pressures are taking a toll on their mental health.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) warns that dangerous stress levels have become normalized within an NHS struggling to cope with demand. Chronic workforce shortages exacerbate the situation, leaving nursing staff running on empty.

Many nurses experience what’s known as “moral distress”—a situation where they recognize the care a patient needs but lack the resources to provide it. Extreme workloads contribute to this distress.

In 2023, for the first time, nurses leaving the NHS cited work-life balance as the primary reason, surpassing retirement. This shift underscores the urgent need for better support and improved working conditions.

With 34,709 vacancies in England, hospitals struggle to maintain adequate staffing levels. Nurses report feeling overwhelmed by the combination of staff shortages and high service demand.

One nurse expressed feeling stressed and anxious due to financial pressures, leading to serious mental health deterioration. The system’s shortcomings are taking a toll on dedicated healthcare professionals.

As we commemorate International Workers Memorial Day, let us remember the sacrifices made by nurses and advocate for their well-being. Their tireless efforts deserve recognition and support.

and finally, £116 sick pay ‘failing those with cancer’

Around a quarter of a million UK workers living with cancer are estimated to be struggling with covering essential costs due to inadequate statutory sick pay (SSP). This issue has prompted the Safe Sick Pay campaign, backed by cancer and health charities, to advocate for change. The campaign emphasizes that SSP should rise to be in line with a worker’s wages up to the Living Wage, in order to properly support cancer patients in their recovery and safe return to work.

The group has written to both Rishi Sunak and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, urging them to address this critical issue. Currently, SSP is set at £116.75 per week for up to 28 weeks, covering the days when someone is off work due to illness (except for the first three days). However, this amount does not offer adequate financial support for workers most in need.

The campaigners propose several key changes:

Increase SSP: The payment should be raised to match a worker’s wages up to the Living Wage.
First-Day Coverage: SSP should be payable from the first day of sickness.
Earnings Threshold: Abolish the earnings threshold so that part-time workers currently ineligible can receive some sick pay entitlement.
Timely Benefits: Ensure that benefits such as Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC) are made available promptly when needed.

By reforming sick pay and providing faster support through the benefits system, we can reduce financial hardship for people during their treatment and aftercare, including those living with cancer. Moreover, these changes would benefit not only cancer patients but also individuals with other long-term conditions, enabling them to safely and securely return to work12.

It’s crucial that policymakers address this issue promptly to alleviate the financial burden faced by cancer patients and ensure their well-being during recovery and beyond.

Picture credit

Manchester Memorial
By Jungpionier – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=742187
Cancer patient
Image by Pexels from Pixabay

Union News 21st of April 2024

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,443 words, 8 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK labour and trade union movement. Reports are by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this week’s edition: Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits, SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers, Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns, Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers, and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote.

Rishi Sunak Unleashes Controversial Overhaul of Disability Benefits

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak ignited a firestorm with his unveiling of sweeping changes to disability benefits, sparking accusations of a “full-on assault” on disabled individuals. Sunak’s proposals include stringent reforms to the Personal Independent Payment (PIP) system, aiming to tighten eligibility criteria and introduce greater medical scrutiny for claimants.

In response to what he termed a “sick-note culture,” Sunak also announced plans to shift responsibility for sick notes away from GPs, igniting concerns among mental health advocates already grappling with overstretched services. Critics argue that the proposed changes risk plunging disabled people into destitution, with some accusing the government of targeting the most vulnerable amidst economic challenges.

Furthermore, Sunak’s pledge to sanction benefits for non-compliance with work coach conditions, along with the threat of benefit removal after 12 months of unemployment, has drawn sharp rebuke from welfare organizations, who argue that punitive measures exacerbate financial insecurity and undermine public trust.

As debate intensifies, concerns over the broader impact on NHS waiting lists and workforce shortages loom large, with calls for a more compassionate approach to welfare reform that prioritizes holistic support and addresses systemic complexities.

SNP-Green Coalition and Tory MSPs Reject Labour’s Proposal for Enhanced Support to Injured Workers

In a surprising turn of events, the SNP-Green coalition in Scotland, backed by Tory MSPs, has quashed Scottish Labour MSP Mark Griffin’s bid to bolster assistance for workers injured on the job. Griffin’s Employment Injuries Advisory Council (SEIAC) Bill aimed not only to establish a new employment injury benefit but also to institute a council of experts, including trade unions, to guide its implementation and monitor progress.

Despite SNP First Minister Humza Yousaf’s recent pledges to prioritize support for workers and their families, his government’s alliance with Tory MSPs led to the rejection of the legislation. SNP social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville defended the decision, stating, “We do not need this Bill,” while acknowledging Griffin’s efforts and their potential contribution to future initiatives.

Reacting to the outcome, Griffin expressed disappointment, accusing the government of abandoning frontline workers grappling with long-term effects of Covid-19, firefighters battling cancer, and former footballers afflicted by dementia. He criticized Yousaf’s administration for failing to accelerate progress toward a more equitable industrial injuries system in Scotland and vowed to continue advocating for workers’ rights.

The contentious rejection underscores tensions within Scottish politics over strategies to address worker welfare and underscores the challenges facing efforts to enact meaningful legislative reforms.

Government Criticized as Schools Cut Teaching Assistants Amidst Funding Concerns

A recent survey conducted by the Sutton Trust has shed light on the concerning trend of staff cuts in schools across the UK, prompting teaching unions to criticize the government’s handling of education funding. According to the survey, more than two-thirds of senior leaders in schools reported having to reduce the number of teaching assistants this year.

Additionally, one in three senior leaders stated that they had to cut teaching staff, while nearly half had to reduce support staff. The impact was particularly pronounced in primary schools, where teaching assistant cuts were highest, while secondary schools experienced greater losses in both teaching and support staff.

Reacting to these findings, Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, expressed shock at the extent of the cuts, noting that three-quarters of primary schools had to reduce the number of teaching assistants to make ends meet. He criticized the government’s lack of seriousness regarding education funding and urged it to wake up to the reality faced by schools nationwide.

Dr. Patrick Roach, the general secretary of NASUWT, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing that children from less affluent backgrounds are disproportionately affected by these cuts, resulting in a compromised quality of education. He criticized the government’s failure to invest adequately in education and called for a new government to address the ongoing crisis in schools.

In response, the Department for Education defended its stance, stating that school funding has been increased to £60.7 billion this year, the highest level ever in real terms per pupil. However, critics argue that despite the increase in funding, the allocation is insufficient to meet the growing needs of schools, leading to staff cuts and resource reallocation.

As the debate over education funding intensifies, the future of staffing levels and the quality of education in UK schools remains uncertain, with calls for comprehensive solutions to address the funding gap and ensure equitable access to education for all students.

Supreme Court Ruling Empowers Workers Against Retaliation by Employers

A landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court this week has bolstered the position of workers facing penalties or discrimination for engaging in strike action. The ruling, which criticizes British trade union laws for inadequately protecting workers’ rights, marks a significant victory for labour rights advocates.

In a scathing critique, the court highlighted the failure of current legislation to shield workers from sanctions short of dismissal during strikes, deeming it incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Lady Ingrid Simler, delivering the judgment, emphasized that the ability of employers to impose punitive measures undermines the fundamental right to lawful strike action.

The case, brought forward by the Unison union on behalf of care worker Fiona Mercer, sheds light on the plight of workers facing repercussions for participating in industrial action. Mercer’s battle against her employer, Alternative Futures Group (AFG), over cuts to payments for sleep-in shifts, exemplifies the challenges workers encounter when asserting their rights.

Despite initial victories in lower courts, the intervention of high-ranking figures sought to overturn favourable rulings, prompting Unison to escalate the case to the Supreme Court. Following the verdict, Mercer expressed satisfaction, stating that while it wouldn’t change her experience, it would serve as a deterrent to unscrupulous employers.

Unison’s general secretary, Christina McAnea, hailed the ruling as the most significant industrial action case in decades, while Paul Nowak of the TUC described it as a monumental victory for the union movement. However, some caution against excessive optimism, noting that the legal landscape still poses challenges to effective labour activism.

Nevertheless, the judgment is seen as a positive step forward, prompting calls for broader campaigns to defend workers’ rights. The implications extend beyond the immediate case, with university lecturers and other workers hopeful for redress for past punitive actions taken against them.

and finally, Amazon Faces “Historic Blow” as Union Recognition Application Advances to Workers’ Vote

In a significant development, Amazon has been dealt a decisive setback as the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) ruled in favour of GMB’s union recognition application at its Coventry warehouse. The ruling marks a milestone in GMB’s efforts and brings Europe one step closer to witnessing the first recognized union at Amazon.

After over a year of industrial action and 30 strike days, the CAC’s decision signals a turning point in the ongoing struggle for union representation at the tech giant’s facilities. The committee has mandated that an independent organization be appointed to oversee a legally binding vote of workers, indicating a crucial phase in the process.

Amanda Gearing, senior organizer at GMB, hailed the ruling as a historic moment in the battle for workers’ rights at Amazon. She likened the journey to a modern-day David and Goliath struggle, emphasizing the resilience of workers against the company’s formidable anti-union tactics.

Gearing highlighted the demands of Amazon workers for fair wages and safe working conditions, stressing the importance of dignity at work and the need for a union to advocate for their interests.

In response to the ruling, an Amazon spokesperson reiterated the company’s stance on employee rights, stating, “Our employees have the choice of whether or not to join a union. They always have.”

As the process moves forward, anticipation mounts for the upcoming ballot, with workers poised to make a crucial decision that could reshape the landscape of labour relations within Amazon’s operations. The outcome of the vote holds implications not only for the Coventry warehouse but also for the broader discourse on workers’ rights and unionization in the tech industry.

If you’ve enjoyed Union News please consider subscribing to the Union News YouTube channel.

Union News 17 April 2024

Subscribe to Union News on YouTube to keep updated

1,938 words, 10 minutes read time.

Welcome to Union News, your guide to what’s happening in the UK trade union and labour movement in the UK. Writing is by Pat Harrington and music is by Tim Bragg. In this edition: reports from the Scottish TUC conference, Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court, New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’ and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster.

Scottish trade unions oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors

During the initial session of the annual Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC), delegates voiced strong support for defending Scotland’s NHS and criticized the SNP-Green Scottish government’s longstanding plans for a national care service (NCS).

Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.

Unison has consistently raised concerns about the NCS proposals, arguing that while they suggest a publicly owned and accountable organization akin to the NHS, they would actually result in much of the care sector being controlled by the voluntary sector and private companies.

Key points of contention include the lack of national sectoral bargaining, reduced local democratic oversight, and the potential side-lining of council social work departments as primary care providers.

Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.

Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatization” of Scotland’s NHS.

The motion called for the STUC to build on previous successes in advocating for progressive tax measures to generate additional funds for public services. It also proposed conducting research to expose instances of backdoor privatization within the NHS in Scotland.

Drew Gilchrist of the North Lanarkshire TUC, himself an NHS worker, stressed the importance of such research in mobilizing a campaign to stop and reverse privatization while advocating for increased investment in services and the workforce.

Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.

Parcelforce Drivers Take Royal Mail to Court

Parcelforce delivery drivers, who are members of the IWGB union, are taking legal action against Royal Mail, alleging that they have been unfairly denied fundamental rights. These drivers argue that they have been misclassified in their employment status and deprived of basic entitlements. The lawsuit, which could involve thousands of Parcelforce drivers across the UK, seeks to compel Royal Mail to compensate them for potential shortfalls in their pay, which could amount to millions.

Previously categorized as self-employed ‘owner drivers,’ many Parcelforce drivers were denied rights such as the National Living Wage and holiday pay. Leigh Day, the legal firm representing the drivers, contends that they should be classified as ‘workers,’ affording them greater rights and potential compensation for past discrepancies in pay.

Concerns were initially raised by three drivers who sought assistance from their union, the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB). With support from the IWGB and legal representation from Leigh Day, these drivers brought claims to the Employment Tribunal. Recognizing the broader implications of these issues, Leigh Day expanded the case into a group claim.

This legal challenge against Royal Mail follows a significant precedent set in a previous case involving Uber drivers, wherein the Supreme Court ruled in favour of classifying them as workers rather than self-employed contractors. This landmark decision laid the groundwork for similar disputes across the gig economy, offering hope to Parcelforce drivers seeking justice.

Marc Francis, a former Parcelforce delivery driver, recounts his experience of working without rights or protections, emphasizing the need for justice for himself and his fellow drivers. The IWGB echoes these sentiments, condemning Royal Mail’s alleged exploitation of its workers and urging affected drivers to join the claim for rightful compensation.

Liana Wood, a solicitor at Leigh Day, emphasizes the importance of recognizing Parcelforce drivers as entitled to workers’ rights, including holiday pay and the national minimum wage. With deteriorating working conditions and decreasing take-home pay, thousands of owner drivers are believed to be eligible to participate in the claim for fair treatment.

STUC Congress Grapples with Cuts: Calls for No-Cuts Budgets

At the STUC Congress in Dundee this month, discussions were dominated by the impact of cuts across Scottish councils, leading to significant job losses over the past 15 years. While calls to support no-cuts budgets were made, they did not gain widespread backing. Clydebank TUC proposed backing such budgets as a strategy to challenge austerity policies, but the general council raised concerns about legality and called for a more practical approach.

Despite this, trades union councils from North Lanarkshire, Fife, and Dundee supported Clydebank’s motion with fervent speeches defending council workers and services. Fife’s Tam Kirby criticized the general council’s cautious approach, arguing for a more aggressive stance against cuts, even if it meant challenging the law.

Referring to STUC president Mike Arnott’s earlier address, Dundee’s Stuart Fairweather emphasized the need for councillors to champion their areas and oppose cuts rather than passively implementing them.

Closing the debate, Clydebank’s Janet Cassidy acknowledged the likely defeat of the motion but stressed the ongoing demand for political challenge against cuts.

Despite support from most trades councils, the motion was ultimately defeated in a card vote. Reflecting on the outcome, delegate Tam Morrison highlighted the urgent need to end cuts, emphasizing that past approaches have failed to prevent significant job losses. While the vote didn’t go their way, the case against cuts remains compelling, signalling a call to grassroots action to bring about change.

Support for key postal service at STUC conference

The Scottish Trade Union Congress has unanimously supported efforts to safeguard essential postal services and protect postal workers.

There are growing concerns among both workers and customers about the potential threat to the universal service obligation (USO) provided by Royal Mail. This obligation ensures a consistent, one-price delivery service across the UK six days a week. Despite earlier assurances from former business secretary, Vince Cable, regarding the preservation of the USO following Royal Mail’s privatization, there are now indications that the company may seek to abandon this guarantee.

Craig Anderson, regional secretary of the Communication Workers Union, expressed appreciation for the congress’s endorsement of the union’s campaign to not only defend the USO but also to enhance the role of postal workers within communities. Anderson emphasized the broader significance of Royal Mail’s services beyond delivering letters and parcels, emphasizing their role in connecting and supporting communities.

He stressed the importance of prioritizing communities and preserving the USO as a crucial element in maintaining social cohesion. Anderson called for Royal Mail and regulators to support the service, support the workers, and invest in the future of public postal services rather than succumbing to cost-cutting measures.

Scottish trade unions come together to oppose privatizations in the healthcare and social care sectors

Audrey McCabe from Aberdeenshire Unison strongly criticized the NCS proposal, describing it as more of a public relations statement than a plan for improved care.

Despite assurances from the Scottish government that the legislation would be amended, unions were dismayed to find unchanged wording in the Bill after its first reading in Holyrood.

Concerns about increasing privatization extended beyond social care, with delegates supporting a motion by the North Lanarkshire TUC highlighting what they termed as “backdoor privatisation” of Scotland’s NHS.

Gilchrist cautioned that Scotland should not rely on the notion that its healthcare system is superior to that of England, urging action to counter privatization trends.

New Campaign Video says NHS staff are ‘Sicker than the patients’

Over half of NHS workers suffer from poor mental health, and one in four has even considered suicide due to the challenges they face.

NHS Charities Together say that 52 percent of staff suffer anxiety and 51 percent suffer from low mood.

Frontline 19 has a campaign highlighting that, in many cases, NHS staff are sicker than the patients they are treating.

Group founder Claire Goodwin-Fee said: “The most common reason for sickness absence was poor mental health, responsible for over half a million days lost in one month.”

You can watch the campaign video titled “Sicker Than The Patients” on their website.
Frontline19 is a free and confidential service specifically designed for frontline workers, including those in the National Health Service and other frontline services in the UK.

and finally, Filthy Rich: Water privatisation has proved a disaster

Water companies have handed nearly 80 billion to investors since the industry was privatised more than 30 years ago.

Since the privatization of England’s water companies in 1989, they have consistently paid out substantial dividends to shareholders.

English water companies are estimated to pay around £14.7 billion in dividends by the end of this decade.

These dividends benefit shareholders but come at a cost to customers, who are also footing the bill for sewage cleanup and other investments.

When water companies were privatized, they were debt-free. Thatcher wrote off the industry’s £5 billion debt at public expense. However, over the years, they have accumulated significant debt again.

As of now, the big nine water companies in England have a combined debt of £54 billion.
This debt burden has raised concerns, especially considering the critical role water companies play in maintaining infrastructure and environmental standards.

Gary Smith of trade union GMB said: “Splashing out fortunes in dividends while racking up enormous debts is a farce.”

The average water and sewage bill in England and Wales rose from £408 in 2021 to £448 from the start of this month. And huge bill increases are expected between 2025 and 2030 to help fund long-overdue investment.

Water companies have also faced criticism for paying large sums to executives while dealing with issues like leaky infrastructure and sewage dumping.

A Solidarity union spokeswoman commented: “Water privatisation has been a disaster. Years of under investment while debt mounted and dividends were paid out. Now customers will be asked to make that money up through higher prices. The obvious answer to this mismanagement is nationalisation but the level of debt built up is one it would be challenging for the State to take on – 54 billion, a far cry from the 5 billion debt written off in 1979 to pave the way for privatisation. Many still believe nationalisation is the way forward but it will be a difficult path now.”