Workers Must Stand Against Reform UK’s Assault on Rights

There are moments in the political life of a country when a proposal is so sweeping, so casually destructive, that it forces every serious organisation to pause and ask: What kind of society do we intend to be? Reform UK’s proposed Great Repeal Bill is one such moment. It is not a technical adjustment to the statute book. It is not a pruning of outdated regulations. It is a deliberate unravelling of the legal protections that millions of working people rely on every single day.

The joke will be on you if you vote for Farage and Reform UK

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has been clear about the stakes. Paul Nowak, its General Secretary, has warned that Reform’s agenda would “rip up the rights that working people rely on”, describing the proposals as an attempt to “take us back to the 19th century.” That is not hyperbole. It is a sober assessment of a programme that explicitly targets the Employment Rights Act, the Equality Act, and the Renters (Reform) Act — the very architecture of modern workplace and tenant protection.

Solidarity, as an independent union, is not in the habit of echoing anyone’s line for the sake of it. But when the rights of workers are threatened, clarity matters. And on this issue, the TUC is right.

The Rights at Stake

To understand the scale of what Reform UK proposes, one must appreciate the nature of the rights they intend to sweep away. The Employment Rights Act is not an obscure technical document. It is the foundation of protections against unfair dismissal, redundancy abuse, and exploitative working practices. The Equality Act is the shield that protects workers from discrimination — on grounds of sex, race, disability, religion, and more. The Renters (Reform) Act is the legislation that finally began to address the insecurity of no‑fault evictions.

Reform UK’s Great Repeal Bill would dismantle these protections wholesale. The TUC has highlighted that this would mean the removal of pregnancy protections, bereavement leave, sick pay from day one, and safeguards against fire‑and‑rehire — a practice that Unite’s General Secretary Sharon Graham has rightly described as “a gift to bad bosses.” Graham has long argued that fire‑and‑rehire should be “outlawed, not encouraged,” and her warning lands with particular force in this context.

These are not luxuries. They are the minimum standards of a civilised labour market.

Workers Do Not Want Fewer Rights

One of the most striking elements of the TUC’s campaign is its grounding in public opinion. A 40,000‑person MRP poll commissioned by the TUC found overwhelming support for existing workplace protections — not just in Labour‑held constituencies, but in Reform‑held ones too. In Nigel Farage’s Clacton seat, for example, 77% of respondents supported banning exploitative zero‑hours contracts, 81% supported ending fire‑and‑rehire, and 66% supported sick pay from day one.

Paul Nowak summarised the findings bluntly: “Working people don’t want fewer rights — they want more.”

This is a crucial point. Reform UK’s agenda is not a response to public demand. It is a programme driven from above, not below. It is a vision of Britain shaped by those who have never had to worry about insecure work, sudden dismissal, or the fear of losing a home through a no‑fault eviction.

The Influence Behind the Agenda

The TUC has also drawn attention to the financial interests behind Reform UK. Their campaign highlights the role of Christopher Harborne, an offshore investor who has donated £15 million to Reform and £5 million to Nigel Farage personally. The TUC’s messaging is direct: “Billionaires might not want workers’ rights — but we do.”

This is not a claim that money alone determines policy. But it is a reminder that political agendas do not emerge in a vacuum. When a party funded by ultra‑wealthy donors proposes the wholesale removal of workplace protections, it is reasonable — indeed necessary — to ask who benefits.

Matt Wrack, General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, has warned that weakening rights is “a recipe for insecurity and fear at work.” For firefighters, whose safety depends on clear procedures, strong protections, and the ability to challenge unsafe practices, the implications are obvious. But the same logic applies across the labour market. When rights are weakened, insecurity spreads.

Why Solidarity Stands With the TUC

Solidarity is not affiliated to the TUC. Our independence and non-affiliation to any political party is central to our identity. But independence does not mean isolation. When the rights of workers are threatened, workers must stand together — not out of institutional loyalty, but out of necessity.

We support the TUC’s campaign because:

  • The Employment Rights Act is the backbone of workplace justice.
  • The Equality Act protects our members from discrimination.
  • Fire‑and‑rehire destroys livelihoods.
  • Zero‑hours exploitation traps workers in insecurity.
  • Pregnancy protections safeguard families.
  • Sick pay is a basic human necessity.

These are not abstract principles. They are the protections our members rely on when they face dismissal, harassment, discrimination, or sudden loss of income. They are the rights that allow workers to challenge unfairness without fear.

Mike Clancy, General Secretary of Prospect, has warned that Reform’s agenda would “undermine professional standards and weaken protections for skilled workers.” His point is well‑made. Rights do not only protect the vulnerable; they protect the integrity of professions, the safety of workplaces, and the dignity of labour.

The Broader Question: What Kind of Country Do We Want?

The debate over Reform UK’s Great Repeal Bill is not simply a dispute over legislation. It is a question about the kind of country Britain intends to be. Do we want a labour market where employers can dismiss workers at will? Where discrimination is easier to conceal? Where insecurity is normalised? Where tenants live in fear of sudden eviction?

Or do we want a society where rights are upheld, where dignity is protected, and where the law stands with the worker rather than the exploiter?

The TUC has framed its campaign with a simple message: “We won these rights together — and we’ll defend them together.” Solidarity agrees. Rights are not gifts from the powerful. They are the achievements of generations of workers who refused to accept exploitation as inevitable.

A Call to Every Worker

Solidarity urges every member — and every worker in Britain — to stay informed, stay organised, and stand firm. The Great Repeal Bill is not a distant threat. It is a clear and present danger to the rights that make work bearable, safe, and fair.

We say this plainly: If Reform UK gets its way, your rights at work will be weaker. Your protections will be fewer. Your security will be lower.

The TUC is right to call this out. Union leaders across the movement are right to warn against it. And Solidarity will not sit quietly while the rights of working people are lined up for repeal.

Workers built these protections. Workers rely on them. Workers must defend them.

By Pat Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity union.

Reform UK signals plans to roll back key employment rights and worker protection

Solidarity is a non‑party‑political trade union. We are not affiliated to any political party and we don’t maintain a political fund. Our responsibility is to keep members informed when political proposals—by any party—could affect your rights, your security, or your working conditions.


Overview

Recent public statements from Reform UK’s leadership outline a programme of sweeping deregulation. These proposals include repealing new employment rights, removing protections for renters, and reversing measures designed to strengthen job security.

Union leaders across sectors have raised concerns that these plans would significantly weaken workers’ rights and shift power further towards employers.

What Reform UK says it intends to remove

Based on their own statements, Reform UK is proposing to:

  • Scrap new employment‑rights rules
  • Remove new protections for renters
  • Repeal regulations designed to improve job security
  • Roll back environmental and industrial regulations they describe as “daft” or burdensome

Their argument is that these rules “kill jobs” and “hinder growth,” and that removing them would reduce inflation and lower bills.

Rights and protections at risk

Union leaders have warned that the following rights could be lost if these proposals were implemented:

1. Ban on fire‑and‑rehire practices

New laws preventing employers from dismissing staff and rehiring them on worse terms could be scrapped.

2. Protections against exploitative zero‑hour contracts

Rules designed to curb the most abusive forms of insecure work may be removed.

3. Stronger unfair‑dismissal protections

Recent improvements that extend protection from unfair dismissal could be rolled back.

4. Parental leave and sick‑pay rights

Opposition parties and unions warn that hard‑won rights in these areas may be weakened or removed.

5. Local government pension security

Reform UK has said it would block new entrants to local government pension schemes and consolidate them into a sovereign wealth fund—raising concerns about long‑term retirement security.

6. Housing protections for renters

Rolling back new rental protections would affect millions of working people who rely on secure, safe housing.

Why this matters for members

If enacted, these proposals could affect:

  • Your job security
  • Your protection from unfair dismissal
  • Your rights around sick pay and parental leave
  • Your ability to avoid exploitative contracts
  • Your pension prospects
  • Your housing stability

These are not abstract issues—they shape the daily lives of working people.

Solidarity’s position

Solidarity does not support or oppose political parties.
Our duty is to:

  • Inform members about political proposals that may affect their rights
  • Defend and advance workplace protections
  • Ensure members understand the implications of changes being proposed

We will continue to monitor developments and provide clear, factual updates.

By Maria Camara

Farage is No Friend of Working People: A Personal View from Pat Harrington, General Secretary of Solidarity

The recent successes of Reform UK at the ballot box – including a by-election win in Runcorn and the Doncaster mayoralty – have understandably caused a stir in political and trade union circles. As General Secretary of Solidarity, I believe we must take these developments seriously and respond with clarity and resolve. Let me be clear: in my personal opinion, Nigel Farage is no friend of working people.

I understand why some working-class voters are tempted by Farage and his Reform UK movement. They are fed up. Years of neglect, stagnant wages, crumbling public services, and a political establishment that appears more interested in spin than substance have left many disillusioned. Farage appears to speak plainly and taps into genuine frustrations. That appeal should not be dismissed or ridiculed. But it should be challenged, because behind the rhetoric lies a record that working people must be made aware of.

Farage’s Voting Record: Repeatedly Opposed to Workers’ Rights

As the Trades Union Congress (TUC) recently revealed, Farage’s voting record speaks volumes. Time and again, he has voted against the interests of the very people he claims to represent:

  • He voted against banning zero-hours contracts, which trap workers in uncertainty and insecurity.
  • He opposed banning ‘fire and rehire’, a cruel tactic allowing employers to sack workers and offer them worse terms.
  • He voted against sick pay from day one, leaving workers vulnerable when they fall ill.
  • He rejected stronger protections for pregnant workers.
  • He voted against collective bargaining rights and trade union access in workplaces.

This isn’t a handful of votes taken out of context. It’s a pattern. A worldview that prioritises deregulation, corporate interests and weakening the power of organised labour. That’s why the focus of all trade unions, in my view, must be on exposing this anti-worker record every time Reform UK is discussed.

Farage’s Persona vs. Farage’s Politics

Farage has built his brand as an anti-establishment rebel. Many see him as someone who is willing to say what others won’t. But we must ask: who benefits from his policies? Paul Nowak of the TUC put it well when he described Farage as a “political fraud cosplaying as a working-class champion.”

Reform UK’s economic platform, far from supporting workers, offers a Thatcherite rehash:

  • £50 billion in public service cuts.
  • Slashing corporation tax from 25% to 15%, giving more to big business.
  • No plan for raising wages or expanding workplace rights.

This is not a programme for social justice or economic renewal. It’s the same old trickle-down economics, dressed up with a Union Jack.

Understanding the Appeal, Changing the Conversation

To defeat Farage and Reform UK, we must first understand why their message resonates. People are angry – and rightly so. But anger must be channelled toward those responsible: the employers who exploit, the politicians who betray, the system that puts profit over people.

The job of trade unions is not only to defend workers at the workplace but also to provide clarity in the public debate where workers rights are at issue. In that spirit, I urge all unions to put Reform UK’s record on workers’ rights front and centre in our campaigning.

We need to:

  • Challenge the myth that Farage stands with ordinary people.
  • Remind voters what his voting record really says.
  • Offer a clear, alternative vision rooted in solidarity, justice, and dignity at work.

What Solidarity Stands For

At Solidarity, we stand unapologetically for working people. That means:

  • Fighting for secure jobs and decent pay.
  • Defending collective bargaining and union rights.
  • Demanding fair sick pay, pensions, and protection for the vulnerable.
  • Building unity, not scapegoating the marginalised.

We also believe in having an open, honest discussion about migration, immigration and refugee policy. That conversation should aim to achieve a fair and humane policy – one that is grounded in reality and guided by compassion, while also maintaining the support of the British people. We want a harmonious national consensus, not culture wars or scapegoating.

The future for our class will not be won by blaming migrants, attacking public services, or cutting taxes for the rich. It will be won by building power from the ground up.

Nigel Farage may talk like he understands working people, but his record shows otherwise. Let’s make sure everyone knows it.

In solidarity,

Pat Harrington
General Secretary, Solidarity